Quoting: LightkeyHe claimed that a normal user would have reported the bug instead and that a normal user indeed reported the bug on GitHub, which then turned out to be a well-versed developer himself.

Which if you dig deeper you'll see that the reddit poster quote mined to find that well-versed developer, in reality the bug had been reported to the Pop!_OS github by many people including both normal users and devs like the one the reddit post highlighted.

This is not to say that the Pop!_OS maintainer could be a bit more PR friendly in his approach here.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Here's to hoping that they don't bring on the 100% Windows gaming experience :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReHafyiDTR0

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: x_wing

Quoting: dubigrasuYou mean the one with the mouse showing in one place and clicking in another? Yes, I had that one too on AMD, I'm not even surprised when it shows up, "oh, that thing again".
As for workarounds, yes, I also use various scripts to force my monitors to do what I want depending on the specific task. But they are simple tasks, and all this xrandr brouhaha should not be needed. Nvidia/Amd/whatever, is a hassle enough that I'm just better with a single monitor.

If xrandr can fix your issue, then the problem is your DE, not the driver. The weird issue to mention on the second guy is the offset of the screen.

Which only happened on the live cd though and not after he installed and used the proper everything so probably a problem with nouveau or the DE used for the live cd.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: AsciiWolf

Quoting: scaineSo it's outdated and broken? That would be odd, since I'm using it every day.

It's hopefully not that broken since I helped fix the worst parts for 20.04, but it's still problematic and outdated when compared to the official deb package from Valve. For example the version in LTS 20.04 is from March 2020 and was never updated[1].

[1] https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/multiverse/s/steam/steam_1.0.0.61-2ubuntu3/changelog

Quoting: F.UltraNot to mention that the steam package is just a shim that downloads the real installer from Valve.

Except that it also has to handle dependencies (that change with time, especially with Pressure Vessel and VR stuff), ship udev rules for VR/controllers and do other things.

Yes I forgot about the udev rules for the controllers! I do think that the steam package should be redone completely as a pure shim that just downloads the valve-hosted .deb and run that.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: AsciiWolfSteam, for example. There were many problems with that package, I helped solve some of them (in collaboration with other Ubuntu community volunteers), but it was really pain in the arse and the package is still regularly broken and outdated.

So it's outdated and broken? That would be odd, since I'm using it every day.

Not to mention that the steam package is just a shim that downloads the real installer from Valve.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: kaktuspalme

Quoting: F.UltraOr rather, not being able to uninstall the desktop would of course work but then we no longer can uninstall the desktop which removes the power that Linux gives you.

I agree, but in Linux we have the freedom to choose whichever distribution we like. But distributions focused on average users should be "non-breakable" and thus maybe even limit your freedom. Personally I wouldn't like to use such a distribution but I would recommend such a distribution for the average user.

Ah ok, yes you might be on to something here. A distro specifically for for Windows refugees!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: kaktuspalme

Quoting: TheSHEEEPStuff like that should be there for people who are interested in digging deeper, but should by no means be a requirement for the average user (unless you aim at techies as your average user).

I actually think that Linux is quite good with real noobs but "bad" for above average computer users. I mean those users who download all sorts of software on Windows but at the same time don't know really how it all works. Linux distros should improve for those types of users.

Question is if that is even possible to do. The problem with those guys is that they do just like Linus and "warning blablalba, who cares" and even a "I force you you type out do as I say!" don't stop then what on earth would?

Or rather, not being able to uninstall the desktop would of course work but then we no longer can uninstall the desktop which removes the power that Linux gives you.

In reality we can never be "Windows but nice", we are simply a completely different system. That said I do think that all the talk about the terminal is exaggerated, for 99% or perhaps even 100% of the cases where people think that they have to use the terminal they can use the GUI, it's just that it's far easier to write a guide that does "nano /etc/whatever.config" than "open the file manager, click back, click on etc, right klick on whatever.config and select "open with another application" then select text editor from the list and so on and on.

I mean there's a reason why Linux have text guides while Windows users have to look at YouTube videos for the same content.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TheRiddickIt's pretty embarrassing for System76 and they should reach out to Linus and work with him to get him to give it another try. Thought I think Linus has committed to Manjaro, lol. Now Manjaro devs are probably pretty nervous!

Good idea but too late unfortunately, the challenge ended a while back.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: F.UltraNot sure how Pop handles this but the full ISO from Debian and Ubuntu contains packages so until you do "apt update" you can install the older versions of packages from the disc, this is done in case you don't have Internet access.

True, but apt can already use the cached list if it can't contact particular online repository servers. So in the case of no Internet access it would simply try the update, not connect, and then use the existing list.

True, and if I'm not mistaken Ubuntu since 20.04 (or perhaps earlier) does an automatic update during the install process.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: F.UltraI just wish they would get out of their "nobody should ever have to use the terminal mindset. The terminal is perhaps the thing that I love the most about Linux...

It lets me do anything on any of my computers from my phone without getting out of bed.

The change to apt that might make a difference (there's no sufficient hurdle that they could have put in front of someone like Linus to prevent this issue) would be to check when the last update was run before installing anything: if the package list is too old (say, if it hasn't been refreshed that day) then automatically update it before trying to install anything. I think Manjaro does something like that? There's no reason why it would be desirable for the package list to be stale, and people aren't generally on dial-up any more, so ensure that the list of versions and dependencies is fresh.

Not sure how Pop handles this but the full ISO from Debian and Ubuntu contains packages so until you do "apt update" you can install the older versions of packages from the disc, this is done in case you don't have Internet access.

View this comment - View article - View full comments