Quoting: subImho bad ports are not an argument against native versions.

No, but they are an argument for developers who don't have the skill to make native versions (no matter how little skill that requires in the end) to instead officially support Proton.

This way, the game will actually get support on Linux.
Previously, looking at how badly broken ARK's port was for, well always, that was not the case.

The choices in those cases are not:
A) Good native version
B) Nothing
C) Proton support
They are:
A) Bad native version
B) Nothing
C) Proton support

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Does that mean you'll start acting up now that the site has entered puberty?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Cue "They want to murder all the babies!" in 3 .... 2 .... 1 ....

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: officerniceNever understood why they implemented it in a co-op game... Was hoping to see it come to Linux soon to get some fresh co-op with the lads.

One guess, and IMO the one that makes most sense:
They somehow implemented the cosmetics and character level stuff in the client instead of the servers.
Which is what they do to keep people playing -> earns them money.
Of course, all of that should be happening on their servers, not the client. But who knows.
Again, if true, hinting at a not-stellarly-competent software team (or a very small one crunched too hard by management)...

Because if this was really only about not cheating in the sense of wall-hack, hp, whatever during a mission - who cares? It's co-op! You can kick/ban people!
If it's really about this, yeah, I don't get it, either.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: KetilIt's one thing to say that the art style doesn't appeal to you, and another to claim the people in the team didn't feel safe giving their opinions on where it was going.

This tells me you have never been working in the (modern) entertainment industry.
Quite frankly, it's a circlejerk and often times even very incestuous (not in a literal sense, more like nepotism combined with hiring by appearances).
People who do not tow the line of whatever someone higher-up is pushing are quickly out of a job.

I've been working somewhat close to the industry now and again over the years - not directly in it, but, you know, close enough to have people from various companies telling you things, especially things they won't bring up to their superiors.

Is it possible that the entire team was totally behind that style from the get-go, despite the very foreseeable reaction (love/hate) it would garner from fans of the series?
Yeah, it's possible.
But so is my theory, if you read again, you'll see I said "I can 100% imagine" (because I've seen and heard it happen many times over), not "this is definitely how it happened".

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestI feel obliged to go off-topic and say that it might not be the coders, it might be management pushing for continual rabbits out of hats instead. I've seen that so very much that it's actually the more likely scenario. The coders themselves have probably performed miracles to get anything running at all under such conditions.

Usually, I'd agree.
But with Fatshark you really have to look at the history.
They have been taking forever to make even simple changes (you know, reminds me of CA a little) in their previous games.

There's also the fact that lots of other devs have exactly the same thing working just fine now.
Only Fatshark and their custom engine can't do it right ... ???

Of course, it is entirely possible that they don't have the manpower in the software-side that they'd need and they are just crunching the few coders they do have.
And those then don't have the time to look into Linux properly - we've all done it, it takes a week or two to get acclimated development-wise if you come from the crutch-driven world of Windows.

In the end, though, even bad coders are a management fault for not detecting that, so you're definitely right in that sense, no matter the actual issue at hand here.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Well, it honestly wouldn't make much sense for them to focus on this.
I don't see much of a continued life for Vermintide I or II once Darktide is out. At least for quite a while.

I still hope that they can get it done for Darktide, but I won't be holding my breath.
Hard to say what the issue is, but Fatshark have proven time and time again that their coders might not be the very best.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: stylonDon't know what was said specifically so I'm not defending anyone but surely he must have expected the change in style to be controversial?

I think this is the problem.
Some people move only within their very limited bubbles, especially in the games industry. And those bubbles then have extremely limited diversity (of opinion).
I can 100% imagine someone like Gilbert being mostly surrounded with yes-men and even if someone didn't like that art style, they most likely shut up about it as to not interrupt the positivity.

And then being shocked that actually his bubble didn't represent the real world accurately.

It's still blown out of proportion, though.
I won't play the game due to hating that art style, as will a lot of others I imagine. It simply was not a good choice and they will lose customers over it.
But the game will likely do well, regardless - it's a Monkey Island, after all.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Ahhh, yes.

1. Release long awaited game with very divisive X.
2. People complain about X (and some few take it too far and make it personal).
3. Shut down all commenting because "everyone's so negative!" (which really isn't the case).
4. Refuse further engagement, because only positivity is desired but that obviously cannot be enforced.

Classic.

If people want to see what the fuzz is all about (right now, the website is down):
https://web.archive.org/web/20220629185751/https://grumpygamer.com/rtmi_trailer
I assume that that one already had the worst comments removed, but I'm not sure. At least I'm not seeing more than a handful there that feel like they needs removal.

Seriously, some people nowadays are not able to take criticism anymore, unless it is padded in cotton and coated with honey.
When did they become so fragile? Or maybe they always were, but social media / internet has made it easier to be confronted with unfiltered opinions.

If you expect everyone around you to be diplomatic, maybe go into politics.
Cause "normal" people sure aren't holding back online and will occasionally get irrational.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Seems fishy.

View this comment - View article - View full comments