It's now confirmed that Rob Wyatt, someone who Atari made a big thing over joining them has quit citing non payment of invoices for at least six months.
As confirmed by The Register who spoke to Wyatt, things have not been going well. Not only has Wyatt completely left the project, it sounds like Atari don't exactly know what they're doing. Originally, Atari said it would have their own Linux-based OS with an easy to use UI and their own store. According to sources The Register spoke to who've had direct contact with the VCS project, that might no longer happen. Sounds like it's turning into a regular Linux box now.
No game developers have signed up to make original games, which is something I expected after their first announcement about actual games years after the IndieGoGo crowdfunding campaign was a retro streaming service. On top of that, they've not been able to pull in the big game engines like Unreal or Unity too.
Remember Atari also said they would fully support streaming services? Apparently that's not even happening either. Instead, you will be running services like Netflix or Amazon through a special build of a Chromium-powered browser. The whole Register article is worth a read, as it's really something.
Meanwhile, Atari have also put out their own update post on the same day likely trying to bury this bad news. It doesn't actually give us anything new, in fact it basically confirms have Atari don't really have anything to show. They explained that the pre-production Atari VCS units can run both Windows and Linux and that's about it right now.
The VCS team do claim they will be able to show their own UI, store frameworks and apps and more actually on a VCS unit to "a select group of press and partners" later this "fall". They also said they're still looking at a retail launch in "spring 2020".
I will be seriously amazed if they actually hit that goal. I still want them to, for everyone that backed them and to have a nice tidy Linux-powered box available like this would be pretty sweet. Let's see what happens but it's really not sounding good.
Last edited by crt0mega on 8 Oct 2019 at 12:36 pm UTC
They explained that the pre-production Atari VCS units can run both Windows and Linux and that's about it right now.
So they've built a little PC that can run Windows and Linux?!? They're just wild and crazy...!
Seriously (and unfortunately):
It's dead.
It's all too obvious, but if you didn't do it yet,
don't let them talk you into preordering this box.
RIP, Atari. :(
I didn't actually own one of your great products decades ago,
but I still like your name and logo.
Let them prove me wrong, but with this last bit of news, there is no hype left in me. The hardware was a cool idea though.
Last edited by Mohandevir on 8 Oct 2019 at 2:45 pm UTC
This is why I will never back anything before a final product has been released.If it was a true investment model, like you earn a share of profits for X amount of time after release, would you feel the same? The typical crowd sourcing we see today for video games is a strange charity. I have done it, but it's still strange.
I've backed several Kickstarter campaigns (latest is Everspace 2, all of which have delivered or are still expected to. When I back a campaign, it is with no expectation that it will deliver either on time, at all, or what I wanted.
This is a shame, but sadly unsurprising news. I doesn't even sound like they have the hardware finalised. Even without the software, and streaming services, if they could deliver a tidy little Linux box with the Atari logo on then backers would probably be (reasonably) happy. It's not going to be that difficult to install whatever emulator you want on it.
I've backed several Kickstarter campaigns (latest is Everspace 2, all of which have delivered or are still expected to. When I back a campaign, it is with no expectation that it will deliver either on time, at all, or what I wanted.
Not trying to sound rude or anything, but, why do you keep giving them your money? All it does is encourage bad behavior and poorly planned out ideas like the Atari VCS.
Last edited by drlamb on 8 Oct 2019 at 2:53 pm UTC
What an unexpected news.+1 for use of sarcasm online without a corresponding tag.
Not trying to sound rude or anything, but, why do you keep giving them your money? All it does is encourage bad behavior and poorly planned out ideas like the Atari VCS.
No, not rude. I don't just back any campaign! I look at who's running it, if they have prior experience with whatever the project is, have they run successful campaigns (and delivered) previously. I backed "The Journey Down, Part 3" because they delivered the first two; I've back Zenva courses because they deliver on time, and I backed Everspace 2 because they delivered an excellent previous product. I hardly think that is rewarding bad behaviour.
If I think the campaign seems fanciful, over-hyped, is just plain BS, or this is their first one I would steer clear. For example, I did not back Atari VCS.
My point about no expectation, was that I recognise that software and hardware is hard, and that despite the best intentions, the project may fail to deliver. In the case of a sole developer, they may have massively understimated the time to deliver, or suffer burnout. Some games still deliver, but many years after they promised. I don't get angry about this.
This is why I will never back anything before a final product has been released.
So you're a consumer then
This is why I will never back anything before a final product has been released.
So you're a consumer then
Anything wrong with being a consumer?
The only people I feel more sorry for than than the one who backed this project, are the ones who washed hundreds of dollars down the drain to buy starships for a certain space game that will arrive not before the end of their life-expectancy...
Ouch.
Really curios if i see the blow out of said game in my life time.
This is why I will never back anything before a final product has been released.
So you're a consumer then
Anything wrong with being a consumer?
No, Why ?
With the current atari's (infogrames) track record (both in crowdfunding and their history in milking nostalgia with manure), this was rather a likely outcome.
Last edited by emphy on 8 Oct 2019 at 9:04 pm UTC
Though some more big players on the market would clearly help to push towards more platform independence in general, it seems that the stakes have gotten way to high for someone new to show up in the near future.....
See more from me