Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

OPGames, a company that (as they describe) helps "turn games into investable assets through NFTs" has donated a bunch of monies to a few great open source projects.

In their announcement they mentioned $300k has gone to Phaser, Defold, Godot, and Blender. In the announcement OPGames CTO and co-founder Paul Gadi said "We are truly honored to be able to support open-source with the funds raised by our Arcadians community! Open-source game engines are the perfect example of a public good: they are free for anyone to use and safeguards developers from platform lock-in. We hope that this donation will inspire others to support more open-source projects, as they will be foundational in how we break free from the attention economy".

From the Godot Engine announcement, Project Manager Rémi Verschelde mentioned that Godot got quite a nice sum with $100k and mentioned clearly how the monies will "used to further the general development of the engine".

Meanwhile Defold's announcement didn't mention a specific number but Defold Product Owner Björn Ritzl did give a slightly longer PR bit: "We are humbled by the very generous donations from OP Games. We very much support and agree with OP Games vision of a decentralised web where game developers are able to fund and create games using open source technologies and build communities of players free of traditional gatekeepers".

Currently Phaser and Blender don't have their own announcements up.

Nice to see NTFs help fund something good.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
22 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
18 comments

elmapul Nov 11, 2021
"attention economy".???
scratchi Nov 11, 2021
"attention economy".???
Were you paying attention? :P

j/k, this lost me too
TrainDoc Nov 11, 2021
God they should reject this money. Please guys..
I say this primarily because we don't know what strings (and we know that there are strings with these things, there always are) are attached and I'd rather Godot and these other entities stay away from that.


Last edited by TrainDoc on 12 November 2021 at 9:31 pm UTC
Nezchan Nov 11, 2021
Amusing to see an NFT group decrying the "attention economy" when so much of its own economy relies heavily on attention-getting stunts.


Last edited by Nezchan on 11 November 2021 at 4:22 pm UTC
BielFPs Nov 11, 2021
I'm not hearing much about O3DE (the Lumberyard fork maintained by the Linux Foundation) which is unfortunately since Cryengine/Lumberyard has some very good visuals.

Always nice to see those FOSS projects receiving donates by big companies, it means that they can improve those tools without have to worry about under funding like some other FOSS projects.
Julius Nov 11, 2021
Free money I guess, but very iffy source. But truth to be told Godot is already sponsored by some large gambling companies using it to make slot machines and so on...
TrainDoc Nov 11, 2021
I'm not hearing much about O3DE (the Lumberyard fork maintained by the Linux Foundation) which is unfortunately since Cryengine/Lumberyard has some very good visuals.

Always nice to see those FOSS projects receiving donates by big companies, it means that they can improve those tools without have to worry about under funding like some other FOSS projects.

It's cool that they released that but that engine is a mess and it's tooling is half-baked. No one used it for anything that shipped and it shows.
denyasis Nov 11, 2021
"attention economy".???

Is that like the new trendy word for "entertainment"?
gradyvuckovic Nov 11, 2021
OP Games supports OP software.
Nezchan Nov 11, 2021
Okay, I actually did the unheard of and looked up what "attention economy" actually is. I know, I'll report to the gulag after this.

Anyroad, it's a real thing. Basically the idea is that there's only so much attention to go around, people will focus on one product or another, and there's competition for that brainspace, very much like there's competition for dollars. What companies like Facebook do is aggressively try to capture and monetize that attention. FOSS projects like Mastodon on the other hand do try to capture attention to some degree, but there's not a focus on monetization.

How does this apply to Godot and why would someone in the NFT space want to break away from the attention economy? Frankly, I haven't a clue, since Godot products are also competing for attention and a good deal are for profit (selling your game) and it's to Godot's best interest to have a lot of attention paid to them so they'll keep getting the big donations. As to NFTs, and crypto in general, being akin to MLMs where they rely on getting new suckers investors in all the time, the attention economy is vital. Breaking free of that would basically sink them in short order.

So in short...I dunno. I think they're just throwing around buzzwords they think might resonate with the FOSS crowd.
Kimyrielle Nov 11, 2021
NFTs are probably one of the five dumbest things ever invented by humanity, but hey, it's free money. It will make these projects better and that's a good thing.
Purple Library Guy Nov 12, 2021
Amusing to see an NFT group decrying the "attention economy" when so much of its own economy relies heavily on attention-getting stunts.
Well after all, how can an NFT be worth anything if nobody is paying attention?

My basic reaction here is something like "This sounds like a dumb company that exists to do dumb things, so it's good that $300,000 of their money will be going to things that are actually good and useful instead of them doing things with it themselves."
TrainDoc Nov 12, 2021
Amusing to see an NFT group decrying the "attention economy" when so much of its own economy relies heavily on attention-getting stunts.
Well after all, how can an NFT be worth anything if nobody is paying attention?

My basic reaction here is something like "This sounds like a dumb company that exists to do dumb things, so it's good that $300,000 of their money will be going to things that are actually good and useful instead of them doing things with it themselves."
200% it's not actually their money and is actually VC money.
hardpenguin Nov 12, 2021
I kiiiiiinda don't like that the Godot & Blender are in the headline but not Defold & Phaser.

Bias detected!
Eike Nov 12, 2021
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
I kiiiiiinda don't like that the Godot & Blender are in the headline but not Defold & Phaser.

Bias detected!

Well, it's a PC software bias, I guess?
akselmo Nov 12, 2021
Without strings: "We will later ask for a thing and you better do it or we'll start whining really loudly."
Purple Library Guy Nov 12, 2021
Amusing to see an NFT group decrying the "attention economy" when so much of its own economy relies heavily on attention-getting stunts.
Well after all, how can an NFT be worth anything if nobody is paying attention?

My basic reaction here is something like "This sounds like a dumb company that exists to do dumb things, so it's good that $300,000 of their money will be going to things that are actually good and useful instead of them doing things with it themselves."
200% it's not actually their money and is actually VC money.
No doubt. This in no way changes my opinion, except now it extends to the dumb VC that exists to fund dumb things, so it's good that $300,000 of their money . . .


Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 12 November 2021 at 5:59 pm UTC
davidak Nov 15, 2021
Without strings: "We will later ask for a thing and you better do it or we'll start whining really loudly."

They could do that without paying anything. They could even ask for money or they whine loudly...
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.