Check out the XDC 2023 talks on HDR + Color Management for Steam Deck / Linux desktop

Watching Josh's talk there makes me realise just how little I know about the magic that makes the pretty images appear in my games. <sigh>

Has anyone managed to test HDR on Steam Deck? I tried with an asus monitor but it was not detected

Gamescope does everything!!!
Except work on NVIDIA cards.... -_-

Edit:
Or maybe that's just gamepad ui under a gamescope wayland session.

Either way, the state of Gamepad UI on NVIDIA GPUs is garbage. I absolutely appreciate everything that VALVE has done for Linux, 100%, but I do feel like at some point they need to stop blaming NVIDIA drivers for the crappy performance of Gamepad UI. Honestly, it feels intentional at this point.


Last edited by reedlove on 19 October 2023 at 4:24 pm UTC

Quoting: reedloveI do feel like at some point they need to stop blaming NVIDIA drivers for the crappy performance of Gamepad UI. Honestly, it feels intentional at this point.

Considering that ChimeraOS has also given up on NVIDIA, I'm not sure Valve is exaggerating.

Quoting: Pyretic

Quoting: reedloveI do feel like at some point they need to stop blaming NVIDIA drivers for the crappy performance of Gamepad UI. Honestly, it feels intentional at this point.

Considering that ChimeraOS has also given up on NVIDIA, I'm not sure Valve is exaggerating.

Considering that ChimeraOS is using VALVE's gamepad ui, which is the culprit P.S., they absolutely could be exaggerating.
Honestly, if the NVIDIA drivers are good enough to play most modern 3D games with good performance etc., rendering a 2D GUI, regardless of whether or not it's using 3D acceleration to do so, should not perform as badly as it does.

Think about it.

Edit:
And it could just be that VALVE is focusing on AMD because that's what's driving the Steam Deck. I understand that, because they need to make sure that their hardware is working as well as possible.
However, is it also fair to say that if they're going to release Steam for general Linux distributions, and make money off of it *regardless of the market size, yadda yadda*, shouldn't a product that isn't explicitly listed as being beta quality work?
When Gamepad UI first came out, I totally had no problem with it not working out of the box. The Linux graphics stack has been in a state of great transition. I get that, but how long has the damned thing been out???
If the VALVE software engineers can continue to crank out all of the lovely things that they do for Linux, thank you VALVE, shouldn't getting a major feature that ships with their software working smoothly be a priority? NVIDIA users aren't just a tiny segment of the Linux community. If anything, I feel like it's exclusionary to a degree.

Am I being unfair??


Last edited by reedlove on 20 October 2023 at 4:57 pm UTC

I also get that VALVE could be spanking NVIDIA for their bad behavior and bad driver development practices by not doing whatever it takes to make gamepad ui work well on NVIDIA graphics cards. They probably think that if NVIDIA users get pissed off enough that they'll go complain to NVIDIA until NVIDIA fixes it. I am not a driver developer, however, I do know enough about the software stacks involved to know that VALVE could totally come up with an interim solution until NVIDIA Proprietary, or NVIDIA Open, drivers are in the state they want them to be.

At this point in time they're just punishing their end-users.

When the high 90th percentile of everything else graphics related works just fine on NVIDIA hardware, there's no excuse.

Quoting: reedloveWhen the high 90th percentile of everything else graphics related works just fine on NVIDIA hardware, there's no excuse.

Honestly that's fair. They may not be as good as AMD but supposedly they work just fine. I think that they just don't want to encourage NVIDIA's laziness when it comes to Linux drivers. It's not a good excuse but AMD is their main focus now and I don't believe that they're working on a general SteamOS release right now.

Quoting: Pyretic

Quoting: reedloveWhen the high 90th percentile of everything else graphics related works just fine on NVIDIA hardware, there's no excuse.

Honestly that's fair. They may not be as good as AMD but supposedly they work just fine. I think that they just don't want to encourage NVIDIA's laziness when it comes to Linux drivers. It's not a good excuse but AMD is their main focus now and I don't believe that they're working on a general SteamOS release right now.

I'm fine with them not focusing on a generic Steam OS for all hardware right now, BUT, **Steam**, >>> THE CLIENT <<<, is still being pushed to the masses as though it were production software.

This isn't something that's being whittled away at by unpaid software developers in the open source community... This is a commercial product/platform that folks spend tons of money on that in many cases only provides you a "license" to play purchased games and software that could be yanked away from you at any time in the event that a publisher gets bought out or folds...

This also isn't an issue with Proton Compatibility etc., which is an insanely complex beast, this is a NATIVE feature for their NATIVE client on Linux.

I think that NVIDIA users have been more than patient. If you're not gonna play nice with everyone at the park then put up some big warning signs all over your platform saying "WE DON'T SUPPORT NVIDIA GPUs ON LINUX", but they're not going to do that, because then they'd alienate a good chunk of an already small segment. If they really love Linux, then they should be inclusive, especially if we're giving them our money. What they shouldn't be doing is using their position of power to publicly neglect a segment of the Linux community, regardless of circumstances.

If they don't want to provide a good work around for the client in the interim, then they can pool their resources in to making the open source NVIDIA kernel module conformant to their specifications and invest in the MESA NVIDIA Vulkan implementation.