Rogue Legacy, a rogue-lite from Cellar Door Games, that originally released in 2013 has now had the source code released. The game has Native Linux support and is rated Steam Deck Verified.
In the announcement on Twitter / X the developer noted they've been working with game porter and FNA developer, Ethan Lee, to make this happen who will be maintaining it going forward.
The game is not open source though, to be completely clear on that. It's source available under a custom license with certain restrictions, much the same as VVVVVV and is actually based on the license that Terry Cavanagh used for it. This is also only the source code, it does not include the assets - so you still need to own a copy of the game.
In their own announcement, Ethan Lee posted on Twitter / X that they intend to take on community contributions to it, and they're in progress on upgrading it to use SDL 3 that's currently in Beta.
Really great to see more developers open up the code for their older games. This way they can practically live on forever. It would have been even better if it was fully open source, but having it open like this is still a great resource for developer curious on what goes on behind the scenes to learn from as well.
Check out the GitHub for the source code.
You can buy the game from:
See the original trailer for the game below:
Direct Link
Quoting: emphyLooks to me that if the code were released under a creative commons license, it'd be CC BY-NC-SA.That violates number 1 and 3 of the open source definition.
So, I'd be pretty comfortable with calling it OSS BY-NC-SA, despite it not adhering to one of the "official" open source licenses.
Creative Commons offers a lot of non-open source licenses.
Still an improvement though, so
.Edit: also I've a problem with how little the open source foundation enforces its trademark.
Source available is a fully functional term and if you want to fit within the open source trademark you should fit the definition.
Last edited by LoudTechie on 16 October 2024 at 9:34 am UTC
Quoting: scaineI find it a bit upsetting that some of the opening comments to this news are negative. It's like someone offering you a free apple pie and turning your nose up and saying you prefer pears. Can we not just celebrate the awesome work CellarDoor and Ethan Lee put into this with a bit of gratitude? That it might help future developers learn, not to mention the modding potential?
I think this is because it feels like a downgrade compared to most game source code releases in the 2000s (where the GPL was typically used, or sometimes permissive licenses). It's much less common to see games have their source code released nowadays, let alone under OSI-approved open source licenses.
These custom licenses can also hinder the game's modding potential due to their terms, e.g. for source ports that are intended to replace the original executable.
These days, when I see a game's source code announcement, I basically assume it's under a proprietary license now :(
Descent 3 is the latest exception I can think of right now.
Last edited by Calinou on 16 October 2024 at 1:33 pm UTC
Quoting: CalinouQuoting: scaineI find it a bit upsetting that some of the opening comments to this news are negative. It's like someone offering you a free apple pie and turning your nose up and saying you prefer pears. Can we not just celebrate the awesome work CellarDoor and Ethan Lee put into this with a bit of gratitude? That it might help future developers learn, not to mention the modding potential?
I think this is because it feels like a downgrade compared to most game source code releases in the 2000s (where the GPL was typically used, or sometimes permissive licenses). It's much less common to see games have their source code released nowadays, let alone under OSI-approved open source licenses.
These custom licenses can also hinder the game's modding potential due to their terms, e.g. for source ports that are intended to replace the original executable.
These days, when I see a game's source code announcement, I basically assume it's under a proprietary license now :(
Descent 3 is the latest exception I can think of right now.
I blame the reaction of the community to Meta's LLAMA.
People went wild about it and nobody clearly contested their "open source" claim, which resulted in the companies(rightfully) concluding that they can get comparable effects with proprietary licenses nowadays.
Last edited by LoudTechie on 16 October 2024 at 1:55 pm UTC
Patreon
PayPal
See more from me