Latest 30 Comments

Quoting: elmapulwait this game was not from ubisoft?

They were the publisher; Steam is currently listing the developer (Reflections) as a Ubisoft studio. Unclear if they are still involved at all, or if all rights and source code are now with the new publisher (Atari). I'd guess the latter.

now on GOG in the GOG Preservation Program

Nice to see they haven't ditched the Linux build on the first game (yet?). But I doubt it's covered by their preservation program. That Linux build is a pretty good sign that Ubisoft was mainly just the publisher, as they don't do Linux (although they did for Stadia; too bad that didn't transfer to the wider ecosystem).

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: elmapulwait this game was not from ubisoft?

It was, but Atari bought the rights last year.

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/atari-acquires-the-rights-to-five-classic-ubisoft-titles/

EDIT: Says so right in the first sentence of this article. :D

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: GerarderloperNow Valve just needs to connect this to the Steam Achievements page for number of times controller dropped.

A lot of industrial devices do have drop counters in them, and I bet it does play a factor in some warranty claims.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

The year is not here yet, I'll celebrate once we hit perhaps 10% of the desktop market share. At least according to Steam we're doing quite okay.

Already exceeding 10% there, if you only care about English.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Linux_Rocks

Quoting: LinuxwarperGoogle is increasingly a great example of a company that used open source like a cheap prostitute, excuse my vulgarity, and now they are shutting down Android.

One could also argue the same thing with Apple and macOS. As at the start, Apple were touting the open source origins of Mac OS X.

Not really the same. Apple butchered Darwin, sure (never mind CUPS, OpenGL support, and probably others), but it never covered anywhere close to what was under AOSP. All Apple cared about with Darwin marketing was attracting whatever Unix fans they could.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

in Israel where it would attempt to play a loud siren and wipe your filesystem.

I certainly don't condone targeting civilians who may even disagree with their government (I very much disagree with a whole lot of what the current government of my country [US] does), but I guess that's better than getting bombed? Civilians in Lebanon and Iran (or Ukraine) would surely prefer damaged computers to what they get now.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: CaldathrasIn fact, I've noticed that fewer and fewer products actually have Amazon as a seller anymore. Most items are sold by marketplace sellers, often as "fulfilled by Amazon". Their software often promotes the marketplace item over their own (which is, admittedly, more expensive). This kind of suggests that they are in fact facilitating and benefitting small business.

To add to what's already been said: Amazon definitely does not benefit small businesses. They take a 15% cut of all sales, which is fine for companies like Apple that build obscene margins into their products, but is half or more of the profit on many physical goods. If you add in "fulfilled by Amazon", that brings even more Amazon fees for the seller, as they charge for warehousing the products, moving them between warehouses, etc., even if the product never sells. They will even charge for destroying the product, if they decide they don't want to sell it for you (all at their discretion). It all revolves around Amazon maximizing their profit, not supporting third party sellers.

On top of all that: Amazon has very strict rules about customers; they make it very clear that the customers belong to Amazon, not to the actual seller of the products. If the seller includes any kind of marketing material in the shipping box or in customer communications ("hey, check out our other great products on www.ournicesite.com"), Amazon revokes their ability to sell. They funnel all emails through their own platform, so they can snoop for such things - sellers do not get actual email addresses.

Edit: So why does anyone sell at Amazon? Because that's where so many customers go first. Comparison shopping sites (PriceGrabber, Shopzilla, and so on) used to be a thing, but between Amazon and Google they got wiped out. Google had free product listings until all the comparison shopping sites were gone, then they started charging for them. They had big plans to be more of a shopping front-end, but abandoned it when they realized too many people just went to Amazon instead. So the current situation is partly Google's fault, but their market manipulation ended up benefiting Amazon more than it did them.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: GustyGhostForecasting a drop back to the high 3~% range next month. This kind of sudden change certainly looks anomalous along the greater trend. Glad to be a part of this growth though. 🐧

You were wrong. Only a drop to 4.53% occured.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

• Implementing Factory Reset Functionality for KDE Linux

I have asked for this for AGES. This should just be standard in every Linux! I shouldn't need to reach for a separate usb flashdrive to fix things! It's not like the concept is new - PopOS has been doing it for ages, they even have a whole GUI to make sure the recovery drive uses the most up-to-date ISO.

I just want a nice GUI to soft reset settings and packages without touching the rest of my files, with an option for a more thorough factory reset, and ideally could maybe work as a recovery environment but we can talk about improvements after the basics been implemented.

It still frustrates me that immutable OS would have all these fancy protections and not have, like, the most simple fallback option that every other OS have, of which has been implemented on Linux on a non-immutable place, despite immutable OS theoretically already having an entire image of the system.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Ehvis

Quoting: Purple Library GuyMy year of the Linux desktop was somewhere around 2000, I can't remember exactly. The Linux desktop sucked really hard back then, but so did Windows 98, so.

That would be more in line with my opinion. I'd say the year when a normal Linux desktop as daily driver was viable. I switched in 2002 and it was viable for a least a little while before that.

I'm gonna split the difference with you guys and say 2001, cause that's when I started using Linux regularly for the first time. I dual-booted, but I did everything but gaming (and a few other things) in Linux.

Quoting: LinuxwarperGoogle is increasingly a great example of a company that used open source like a cheap prostitute, excuse my vulgarity, and now they are shutting down Android.

One could also argue the same thing with Apple and macOS. As at the start, Apple were touting the open source origins of Mac OS X.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: elmapul"Curiously, the malware was designed to steal passwords and security keys but not just that - it had a special payload if it detected you're in Israel where it would attempt to play a loud siren and wipe your filesystem. Ouch."

wich make it obvious who is behind that shit, the list of suspects is quite small, i mean, nations that could be behind that

Food for thought - it could have been Israel in an attempt to garner support in a rather Israel-hostile world. Like when, and there have been tons of cases, a Jew paints a swastika on their car/house/dorm door in an attempt to garner sympathy.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: Linux_Rocksbut_why.gif

Imagine Baby Shark, for example, had been stuck in a significant chunk of all films, TV programs and computer games for 75 years because it's "funny." How would you feel the next time you heard Baby Shark?

I had to Google Baby Shark. I guess this is like how my one friend hates "DJ Airhorn" or whatever. lol

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Linux_Rocksbut_why.gif

Imagine Baby Shark, for example, had been stuck in a significant chunk of all films, TV programs and computer games for 75 years because it's "funny." How would you feel the next time you heard Baby Shark?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: CatKillerI really hate the Wilhelm scream. Kudos to Valve for the little joke, but I really hate the Wilhelm scream.

but_why.gif

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I backed Mina the Hollower on Kickstarter, but I'm getting the Switch 2 version. lol

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: CatKillerAlso of note for the Germany/KDE connection is [Blue Systems.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Systems)

Also, Matthias Ettrich (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Ettrich, founder of the KDE project) is german 😊

Here's a transcription of the original announcement:
https://kde.org/announcements/announcement/

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Yeah the name is a bit odd but I don't think calling it the INDEX 2 would work either since the Index was very different to how it worked and people would certainly get the requirements mixed up. (like needing PC, tether and tracking stations)

Even tho the Frame is still technically needing a PC. It has been said it should be able to play Quest-3 tier games no problems standalone if you can install the APK.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Hopefully soke communitty made tools pop up to change it to a Portal 2 turret.
Need mine to go "I'm different!" Every couple drops.
Really surprised they never leaned on customizability on the noises for the orignal Steam Controller and now SC2
Steam deck we already got plenty.

Wish i coulda grabbed a controller before but eh wait till the stock is back.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Now Valve just needs to connect this to the Steam Achievements page for number of times controller dropped.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: LoudTechieClearly unfinished and unprofessional
Explained: rm -rf / really?
It's  for driveLetter in {1}[abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEVGHIJPLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ]; do dd if=/sd$driveLetter of=/dev/null bs=1M status=progress; done

Got your dd parameters backwards 😁

if = input file
of = output file

So, your command reads the drives and does nothing with it.

I won't post a corrected line just to avoid someone copy&paste'ing it by mistake 😝

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: elmapulthe list of suspects is quite small

Did you leave out a sarcasm tag?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Stellaso much time and effort went into distro packages that could've been used to make the flatpak better😫

The entire point to their improvements is so you DON'T have to depend on distro packaging.. simply download their package and never have to manually update it or reinstall it. and TBF the vast majority of us refuse to use flatpak /snap when there is a perfectly fine native package

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: F.UltraBut companies making stuff without giving them money would be breaking trademark law and thus open to be sued by HDMI Forum,

Only if you use their trademarks - the logo and the name. Otherwise you're in the clear on that front. Patents and contractual obligations are a different matter, obviously, but if you don't use someone's trademarks then you have no liability for using their trademarks.

Yes but how do you sell and market a HDMI product without saying that it is a HDMI product ;) so there is no way around breaking trademark here if you are not licensed. Simply trying to sell "video cable" will probably not get you customers, and that every single noname cable on AliExpress is clearly labeled as HDMI informs me that the low flyby firms agrees :)

Quoting: CatKillerNo, you also have to pay for access to the spec just as access to the spec. That's the particular part that they were sniffy about AMD putting in an open source implementation. And that was a change for 2.1 that was different to earlier versions, AFAIK.

What I meant was that you as a manufacturer are not really interested in the specs, you are interested in the rights to sell your stuff as HDMI-labelled. Aka the specs are just a means to get to the real end, nice to have but not mandatory. The open source alternative drives that where released just before this from a lone dev shows that access to specs isn't necessary at all, and perhaps that indeed was the signal that HDMI Forum needed to see to understand, who knows.

edit: but yes I agree that my problem is that I am trying to look at this rationally on what the harms and the non harms is in reality for HDMI Forum, which is not necessarily the same as them having the same understanding. Most of the members there probably don't even know what open source really is (I mean digging through the AMD sources to understand how the HDMI specs works is way way more labour intensive than simply sitting with a digital oscilloscope and do measurements on the actual pins.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: LoudTechie

Quoting: F.Ultra

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: F.UltraPayment was never the issue though and AMD is and have been for years a HDMI licensee. There is nothing with these patches that would or could make HDMI Forum not get payed exactly what they where payed before.

I think the logic (from an artificial scarcity hoarding viewpoint) was that if they didn't keep the spec super secret, companies could just make stuff without giving them money. Which they didn't like the sound of. But, as you say, you still need to give them money (and AMD did) for the compliance tests and the sticker, and that's where the prestige is. "Proper" hardware companies will still give them money to remain "proper," and fly-by-night won't-conform-to-the-spec companies weren't going to give them money either way.

But companies making stuff without giving them money would be breaking trademark law and thus open to be sued by HDMI Forum, aka the reason that you pay for the specs is not to get access to the specs but to be allowed to sell products labelled with HDMI. And the fee for the specs are minuscule, only $10k per year (or $5k for low volume manufacturers), the real money is the per sold item royalty (up to $0.2 for high volume and flat $1 for low volume) since that times millions of devices per year adds up quite significantly.

And fly-by-night would not be affected by open drivers since they already have the specs (they are ofc widely spread in China for free). But I guess that some of the members where afraid of that and others have now countered, we simply don't know who it was since all 80+ companies have voting rights (and their votes are not made public).

Trademark law is weak compared to what the HDMI forum wields to keep others from releasing HDMI compatible stuff.
I'm talking copyright, contract law and patent.

No it is only trademark, there is nothing to copyright (aka you releasing a HDMI product that is not licensed cannot breach copyright) and the patents in HDMI only covers things like how cables and connectors are constructed not the things that the driver implements. And trademark is not weak here since if you want to sell a cable the end user wants to know that it is HDMI compatible so you have to mark it as HDMI somewhere and the second you do without a license then you are breaching trademark.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Also of note for the Germany/KDE connection is [Blue Systems.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Systems)

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

wait this game was not from ubisoft?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

"Curiously, the malware was designed to steal passwords and security keys but not just that - it had a special payload if it detected you're in Israel where it would attempt to play a loud siren and wipe your filesystem. Ouch."

wich make it obvious who is behind that shit, the list of suspects is quite small, i mean, nations that could be behind that

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Purple Library GuyMy year of the Linux desktop was somewhere around 2000, I can't remember exactly. The Linux desktop sucked really hard back then, but so did Windows 98, so.

That would be more in line with my opinion. I'd say the year when a normal Linux desktop as daily driver was viable. I switched in 2002 and it was viable for a least a little while before that.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I really hate the Wilhelm scream. Kudos to Valve for the little joke, but I really hate the Wilhelm scream.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: F.UltraBut companies making stuff without giving them money would be breaking trademark law and thus open to be sued by HDMI Forum,

Only if you use their trademarks - the logo and the name. Otherwise you're in the clear on that front. Patents and contractual obligations are a different matter, obviously, but if you don't use someone's trademarks then you have no liability for using their trademarks.

aka the reason that you pay for the specs is not to get access to the specs

No, you also have to pay for access to the spec just as access to the spec. That's the particular part that they were sniffy about AMD putting in an open source implementation. And that was a change for 2.1 that was different to earlier versions, AFAIK.

And the fee for the specs are minuscule, only $10k per year (or $5k for low volume manufacturers), the real money is the per sold item royalty (up to $0.2 for high volume and flat $1 for low volume) since that times millions of devices per year adds up quite significantly.

Sure, and their fear was that people would crib the spec from AMD's driver, and make anonymous actually-compliant devices without paying the tithe.

And fly-by-night would not be affected by open drivers since they already have the specs (they are ofc widely spread in China for free). But I guess that some of the members where afraid of that and others have now countered, we simply don't know who it was since all 80+ companies have voting rights (and their votes are not made public).

For sure. Hey, you thought their position was silly, I thought their position was silly, device makers, consumers, journalists all thought their position was silly. Hopefully now they've also realised that their position was silly. The likely outcome from them holding their silly position was that DisplayPort and older versions of HDMI become more attractive.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment