Latest 30 Comments

My review.
+ Totally implementable.
+ not a giant big tech boon.
+ simple law
- easy to circumvent.
- I don't trust them to not turn this in something problematic.
- also applies to IOT and servers.

This will mostly result in the automation of these cookie banner like age gates.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: grigiIt doesn't make sense to have this kind of data attached to a device like a computer. My kids will just as happily use Grans computer (or ours) as the school computer to fiddle around on Scratch for example.

None of the computers are "theirs", they are not the primary users.

In what world do they expect even well off people like us to provision a separate computer for each person? The kids don't need their own thing, they also shouldn't have unfettered access to screens, so they won't get their own system until they can acquire one themselves.

It's not attached to the computer it's attached to the user account(poor FreeBSD doesn't have accounts)

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Savor592What if I want to use my device offline? Never connect it to the internet. Old game consoles?

Just this single requirement has already so many problems attached to it.

The law actually doesn't seem to specify being online.
It puts limits on how this data when shared online should be used, but not that it must be shared online.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Nice thing about these games is that they’re pickup and go.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

This is the "foot in the door". Once the opening is established then we all know what will follow.

Very, very sad and frustrating times lay ahead.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Big tech will have nigh universal, preemptive permission to assume indemnity because said user claimed to be an adult via operating system attestation. It's for the chiwwwdrin! 🙄

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

The case about licenses is a valid one. As the AI generated code license could really conflict with the project license as you don't really know from where it was taken.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Saw the post on Steam. Glad they're out of prison.

The game has a lot going for it, so I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

What if I want to use my device offline? Never connect it to the internet. Old game consoles?

Just this single requirement has already so many problems attached to it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

It doesn't make sense to have this kind of data attached to a device like a computer. My kids will just as happily use Grans computer (or ours) as the school computer to fiddle around on Scratch for example.

None of the computers are "theirs", they are not the primary users.

In what world do they expect even well off people like us to provision a separate computer for each person? The kids don't need their own thing, they also shouldn't have unfettered access to screens, so they won't get their own system until they can acquire one themselves.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

LLAP

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

If you want to give them the benefit of the doubt: it may be fixing some not yet public CVEs.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I was waffling on the recent sale; now I'm glad I went for it.

Neither the developer or publisher have anything else listed on Steam, so with this game being removed, they surely won't survive (if they haven't already folded).

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: JarmerI guess there's reasons for it, but ... I suppose this is a perfect example of "don't buy ea games yall".

It really depends. Some games are absolutely safe to purchase in early access.
Factorio was a blast way before it fully released and would have been "fine" even if development had stopped the moment you purchased it back when.
Same for Caves Of Qud, same for DRG: Survivors, same for Palworld, and many more.

What all of this is really an example of is: "Don't purchase blindly. Do your research."

This game in particular had quite a few red flags when looking into it (most of all a clearly unsustainable vision unless it would've been a mass success, which seems impossible given the lack of mass appeal), long before this announcement.
Then a VERY lengthy stay in early access (this can go well, but is definitely a flag).
Then the issues they kept dancing around through their updates.
Then the update pace.
I'm sure there would be more.

And it's not like purchasing games that are not in early access is safe from purchasing an unfinished game in any way, I'm sure I don't need to give examples here...

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: LoudTechieThere's one thing I hope AI'll bring the ability for non-technical people to check source code for backdoors.

This just results in low quality / incorrect bug reports, wasting the time of whoever has to review them.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Boy, that sure is Dramatic.... 😅

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

One of the biggest issues with modding Windows games under Linux is related to RETRO games, or OLD GAMES which have OLD windows tools that don't like wine for whatever reason.

A good example of this is the modding tools for Dragon Age Inquisition, and I think DA2 as well. But there are many other examples where the modding tools straight up have a fit under wine! resulting in almost all mods being unusable!

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

That'll stop those Operating Systems exploiting young children...........................................................................................................................................................🤔

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Like many, I didn't even know it existed until now. And it looks like a decent Star Trek Flick game.

Is it a complete game or kind of broken development title?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

i can't wait for the multitudes of legislators supporting this nonsense to get hacked and their infomation changed to deny them acces to anything because they're too young.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Would it be technically possible to externally have achivements if a game didn't have any to begin with?
It'd be cool for active communities to nominate and vote on player submitted achivements.

Is there any kind of standardized, open protocol for achivements?
Imagine if indie devs could simply build a small structute to talk to Sentinel and the community handles what is an achivement, the SS of it or other graphic representation or reward, name of it, and guides to accomplishing them.

No idea if any of that is doable in any capacity but, those might be really interesting next steps to expand Sentinel.

That said, I only pay so much attention to achivements to begin with but, it is nice getting them. I am curious to see what's available and make some amount of effort on obtaining what I think I can.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: RubyRose136Not specifically related to this article, but this may be a concern for you: Luanti is [now being coded with AI](https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/commit/e6f0377ea2cb60c0c267b9ea570c1b4cc059d5b7) and its ContentDB [allows AI-generated content](https://content.luanti.org/policy_and_guidance/#43-ai-generated-content) as well.

As much as I despise genAI, this kind of commit is how it should be used - security checking existing, well-written code for best practise

And tools like this existed for years before the 2022 genAI "boom", it was simply that the masses couldn't afford them, because they were Enterprise-level CI/CD DevOps tools.

correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't genai broadly based on technology we've had for decades? like I was under the impression the only meaningful difference between cleverbot and chatgpt is modern genai stuff uses an ungodly amount of data, and the reason that something like it wasn't done before is because it was impractical to get that amount of data legally and process it in a way that could be turned into a profitable venture (and looking at modern AI companies, it looks like neither of those issues were ever solved)

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

like I said with the california bill, would *love* to see how this would be enforced with open-source software redistributed through a billion different services with no personal ownership by any person or entity

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

yet another reminder that piracy laws should be updated with a whole lot of exceptions

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaineFeels like you're still defending base degradation as a good thing, or at least as an irrelevant thing. Not sure why.

I had over 100 hours in the game when I stopped, but the base degradation, while probably necessary in an MMO-setting, was infuriating. There is no positive, for the player, to have base degradation, other than getting some land back when a player stops playing entirely.

If my generators run out while I'm on holiday, or traveling for work - coming back to find all my storage boxes emptied by scavenging players would instantly stop me playing this game. Giving me some bonuses later for rejoining doesn't give me back the hours I spent creating my base, building the vehicles, collecting tens of bodies for water, all the unique components I'd collected from science sites, all the custom weapons I'd gotten during runs.

I genuinely loved playing this game while it lasted. I really hope they offer self-hosted options to remove degradation, and I can actually see myself getting back into it again.

This reminds me another Dune fan who said that Dune: Awakening is too much about spice farming and not enough about whatever he thinks the core pillar of the Dune lore is. If they had not done sandstorms or sandstorm that degrade the bases, it would be just a different people being mad that it isn't a thing.

I have never gone on a month long holiday without knowing about it in advance, so I don't understand about those people who bring out the travelling narrative. If you backup your base, you can continue where you left off in no time or just store the "valuable" items in the bank. Your account doesn't get wiped, your base does, very slowly (it takes weeks on top of the already 4 weeks you can have it powered). Your storage boxes doesn't open before your sub-fief is destroyed (cannot be done by players in PvE).

This reminds me many Dune: Awakening players, who are pissed now that the game is made too easy, doesn't feel like a harsh desert anymore, more like a playground for kids - there is nothing at stake. I wonder, who will keep the game alive longer, those who quit for any nuisance or those who embraced the survival?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I know it might not sound like much, but I already reached out to my congressman to ask them to fight this hot garbage.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Feels like you're still defending base degradation as a good thing, or at least as an irrelevant thing. Not sure why.

I had over 100 hours in the game when I stopped, but the base degradation, while probably necessary in an MMO-setting, was infuriating. There is no positive, for the player, to have base degradation, other than getting some land back when a player stops playing entirely.

If my generators run out while I'm on holiday, or traveling for work - coming back to find all my storage boxes emptied by scavenging players would instantly stop me playing this game. Giving me some bonuses later for rejoining doesn't give me back the hours I spent creating my base, building the vehicles, collecting tens of bodies for water, all the unique components I'd collected from science sites, all the custom weapons I'd gotten during runs.

I genuinely loved playing this game while it lasted. I really hope they offer self-hosted options to remove degradation, and I can actually see myself getting back into it again.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: tmtvl

Quoting: LachuBut any other implementation than field in passwd is bad.

I'll quote from the article:

Quoting: Liam Dawerather than relying on self-reported ages.

Hence just having a box that says 'how old are you?' with a simple input is not good enough.

Some options for how it may actually work:

• Scan your ID card to verify (although many people in the USA apparently don't have an ID card because they don't really need it and don't want to spend the money, which to me as a Belgian is wild).


• Scan your driver's license to verify.


• Scan your birth certificate to verify.


• Input your SSN (Social Security Number).


• Submit a blood sample.


• Maybe you'll be able to request some kind of certificate from your city hall which can be scanned.


• Or perhaps something else I didn't think of.

Of course, those could be defeated by having someone else do it for you, so maybe monitors will have iris scanners and keyboards fingerprint scanners so you're constantly being verified (government of the USA, I'll take payment for my contributions to your cause in silver or Ethereum, thanks).

Having someone else do it for you is the least of our worries.
People have direct access to the checking code how do you keep them from making a mod that always says it's good to go?

Also, which wallet address(jk.)?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Purple Library GuySo if they're not selling the game at all, is it still piracy or should it properly be called "game preservation" instead?

legally it is still piracy in most of countries

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

AI being used by experienced developers is one thing (maybe almost acceptable), they can usually spot mistakes and all that, but with increased use, less experienced devs will also think it's okay to use AI, but will not be able to see errors and code will start degrading. I think the idea of spaghetti code and nobody around that knows what exactly it's doing or why it's the way it is, is going to be a humongous problem beyond what it is today.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment