Latest 30 Comments

Quoting: tpau

Quoting: PaldinoXAs is typical with these kinds of remasters, I think the ultra HD textures and modern lighting on top of the low-poly environments make the game look significantly WORSE than the original.

Yea i think if a game is too old, it needs to be done again from the ground up with a lot more polygons and fresh animations.
Otherwise it feels odd.

I get what you are saying, but I disagree.
I think you can in almost all cases absolutely remaster an old game, put modern features and visuals into it and still keep the spirit and the look of the original. Take a look at the Quake1 remaster: QOL features, high resolutions, widescreen, 120fps, dynamic lighting, ambient occlusion, depth of field, colored lighting, updated effects and enemies and weapons with more polygons – yet it still looks and plays exactly as you remember Q1 did back in the day.
It is possible to do that and do the original justice. It's just that it takes quite a bit more work than updating the engine and upscaling/repainting textures.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: tuubiIgnoring any and all other concerns: As long as they don't then imagine that they've actually written a story, and try to claim copyright to the result, I guess it would be fine? I'm sure it feels rewarding for them to get that story out. They haven't become an author, more like an amateur editor, but still, good for them.

I guess this is where we differ. For me an author is the person that came up with the idea for the story, plot, characters, arcs, scenes, and development. So if the person (A) is doing all of that and describing them in the best detail they can to someone (B) who writes the actual words (be they computer or human) then in my mind A is still the author.

Quoting: tuubiI think the situation would be different if they'd actually written the whole story to the best of their ability, and used these tools to give them suggestions on how to make it better. A lot more effort, but there's a reason even established authors work for months, sometimes years, to write a novel, even with getting help and feedback from professional editors and readers. Most of us haven't got the talent or the patience for that, but that doesn't make it okay to just outsource the bulk of the effort.

That's a fair point and I guess then it comes down to how much of each. My friend (who is not actually considering using AI at this moment I should point out) has written several scenes of the book himself. If he uses an AI to help fill in the gaps between the scenes, is there a moment for you when it becomes not his work, or is it simply if he uses the AI at all? Genuinely interested in your opinion here, I appreciate from your later comment that my tone has not reflected that.

Quoting: spymastermattI guess my analogy in this case would be is the songwriter who writes clever lyrics, less of a songwriter because they can't sing it themselves? Should we scorn them for using a singer instead of just singing it themselves like a real artist

Quoting: tuubiThe analogy doesn't work. Why wouldn't they be called a songwriter after writing a song? They'll get their share of the royalties. They just can't be called a singer. Just like your friend isn't an author after prompting and editing a book.

I guess then the problem for me is that we don't yet have a view or word to separate the ideasmith from the author in the way we do the songwriter and singer.

Quoting: spymastermattAgain, we've taken the idea that AI can make a book given a one sentence prompt and blanket swept that that must therefore be the only way people use it

Quoting: tuubiNo, what you've done is ascribe a lack of understanding to people with valid criticisms of the technology and how it is being used in the real world. Sure, some people react with their gut, but critics do include a lot of people who are actually in the know, but crucially not invested.

I apologise that this is how I have come across, I was intending to question what feels like gut reactions but I appreciate that has come across as assuming people don't understand.
I was trying to separate PurpleLibraryGuy's suggestion of

Quoting: Purple Library Guyif someone tells a large language model "Write me a book about this" and thinks it's theirs because they had an idea (which apparently does happen) . . . that's incredibly stupid.

from the idea of people using AI to fill in gaps rather than write the whole story. From my perspective there's a big range between Wrote the book entirely myself -> Had the AI spell and grammer check -> Had the AI fix up some scenes to make them read better -> ... all the way through to "Told the AI to write a sci-fi book about an alien who lives on earth" (which I 100% agree removes any creative direction from the human)

And yes, a lot of the reactions to every announcement of AI use in any form feel to me like
"100% AI = bad, therefore 1% AI = bad"

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: SlaxerAs an artist by trade, I'm not worried about AI replacing artists. That's not the problem.

Yeah, the AI is incapable of replacing artists, but it's capable of chewing up all the artists' works and spitting out something more or less acceptable by an executive. So yeah, it won't replace artists but it will be used (by CEOs) as a replacement for a junior illustrator, who with some work, persistence and money (to support day-to-day living) might have grown to be an artist, something that will now be a bit harder...

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Thanks for pointing out, I missed that one!

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

If i had just watched the Trailer, i would have guessed it's a DLC for Mass Effect Andromeda. The graphic style, the setting, the followers, combat etc... it just has 99% ME vibes.

Could be a good game, would be nice you could choose a female protagonist though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

We're truly in the era of safe bets with sequels and remakes

Yeah, we do...
As much as I've loved playing CoH, I've also got to say that I have grown quite tired of remakes. Not only do long for some new experiences every once in a while, but I also think that many of them are just nostalgia bait. And sadly not all remakes are technically good IMO – for every C&C or AoE2 there seem to be a dozen that are just a bit worse than the original with a community patch.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: spymastermatt

Quoting: Purple Library Guyif someone tells a large language model "Write me a book about this" and thinks it's theirs because they had an idea (which apparently does happen) . . . that's incredibly stupid.

Absolutely agree, 100%!

But if someone develops an entire story, with a good plot and character development and twists and turns and they get the AI to actually put it into words because they just can't, and then they enrich it by reading it back and tweaking and adding and refining to make it the story they had in their head but could never express because of their ADHD, is their story less good because they couldn't write each individual word?

This, as you might have guessed, is a real story about a friend of mine who has fantastic ideas for stories, and describes great scenes from this particular book they would love to write, but can't. AI might give them the chance to do so. And yes you're absolutely right, the story has changed and refined and got better each time they've come to me over the years and said "I've changed this bit and added this bit between those scenes and tweaked this characters backstory a bit". But they're still doing that despite not writing a complete book, just snippets.

Ignoring any and all other concerns: As long as they don't then imagine that they've actually written a story, and try to claim copyright to the result, I guess it would be fine? I'm sure it feels rewarding for them to get that story out. They haven't become an author, more like an amateur editor, but still, good for them.

I think the situation would be different if they'd actually written the whole story to the best of their ability, and used these tools to give them suggestions on how to make it better. A lot more effort, but there's a reason even established authors work for months, sometimes years, to write a novel, even with getting help and feedback from professional editors and readers. Most of us haven't got the talent or the patience for that, but that doesn't make it okay to just outsource the bulk of the effort.

Quoting: spymastermattI guess my analogy in this case would be is the songwriter who writes clever lyrics, less of a songwriter because they can't sing it themselves? Should we scorn them for using a singer instead of just singing it themselves like a real artist

The analogy doesn't work. Why wouldn't they be called a songwriter after writing a song? They'll get their share of the royalties. They just can't be called a singer. Just like your friend isn't an author after prompting and editing a book.

Quoting: spymastermattAgain, we've taken the idea that AI can make a book given a one sentence prompt and blanket swept that that must therefore be the only way people use it

No, what you've done is ascribe a lack of understanding to people with valid criticisms of the technology and how it is being used in the real world. Sure, some people react with their gut, but critics do include a lot of people who are actually in the know, but crucially not invested.

I know this is not the first time we've sacrificed something important, like the environment, for profit and/or convenience. But it sucks every time.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: NezchanI'll probably never be good enough to see most of the biomes, if we're being honest, but real cool they're finally completing all the lands.

Been there, but you can do a lot about it! I really suck at Soulskike games, but in valheim you first and foremost have to find your own rythm. Most of the time the answer is good preparation and not to panic. In combat, i tended to run far too much, which drained stamina and kept me dying. Another thing to do if you struggle: drop down the death penalty to casual or so. The skill drain is too exhausting for many people before they managed to make good use of the no-skill-drain timer, and even then it is helpful. As for the ashlands... yeah, PTSD-Country.
Best advice though: go in with one to three friends. Its so much more fun to struggle, and helping comrades to get their gear back has led to the most hilarious scenes in my entire gaming life.
I hope to get my gang back for the 1.0.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

You may want to add that it is also a book series by Peter Hamilton. It's called EXODUS as well, with the first book being named The Archimedes Engine.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I get the idea when the tires have "flames", but what's with the green glow?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Purple Library Guyif someone tells a large language model "Write me a book about this" and thinks it's theirs because they had an idea (which apparently does happen) . . . that's incredibly stupid.

Absolutely agree, 100%!

But if someone develops an entire story, with a good plot and character development and twists and turns and they get the AI to actually put it into words because they just can't, and then they enrich it by reading it back and tweaking and adding and refining to make it the story they had in their head but could never express because of their ADHD, is their story less good because they couldn't write each individual word?

This, as you might have guessed, is a real story about a friend of mine who has fantastic ideas for stories, and describes great scenes from this particular book they would love to write, but can't. AI might give them the chance to do so. And yes you're absolutely right, the story has changed and refined and got better each time they've come to me over the years and said "I've changed this bit and added this bit between those scenes and tweaked this characters backstory a bit". But they're still doing that despite not writing a complete book, just snippets.

I guess my analogy in this case would be is the songwriter who writes clever lyrics, less of a songwriter because they can't sing it themselves? Should we scorn them for using a singer instead of just singing it themselves like a real artist

Again, we've taken the idea that AI can make a book given a one sentence prompt and blanket swept that that must therefore be the only way people use it

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Slaxer

Quoting: scaineAh, the "it's just a tool" argument. I'm not a fan of this.

Me neither, I hate it. It's the start of something that has largely only existed in science-fiction, and something that has never existed before in human history - but it's just a tool, they say. Yes, I'm aware that in its current state it's technically still not anything close to what the term "artificial intelligence" implies, but still. I feel like I'm being gaslit whenever someone says it.

Quoting: spymastermattIn particular your point about how you would make a bad table because you lack the skills, demonstrates for me exactly what I'm talking about. Here we have an actual game studio, who's professionals are using it as a tool and we are slating it because we assume suddenly that they've fired all the professionals and had people with no creative skill use the tool.

As an artist by trade, I'm not worried about AI replacing artists. That's not the problem. I just believe that the painstaking monotony of sculpting every scale on a dragon, or modeling the treads of a tire by hand, or having the discipline involved in painting something like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel over years is what makes art beautiful. There is always an element of pain in any form of creation, and it's the secret ingredient to good art. Hypothetically, if you knew that every piece of Renaissance art in Italy was actually just made by a machine, do you think it'd be worth flying over to Italy to see? They'd completely lose their significance. AI isn't going to enable artists to be more creative by liberating them from hard work. At the very least, its use by artists is eventually going to make artists lazier and less skilled at their craft. At most, it's going to make art pointless.

So to draw the analogy again, is the bespoke table made by a carpentry workshop less valuable because they used a CNC to cut the top and bore the fixing holes? Did they put less creative design into it because they used the machine?

Yes there is awe in the ability to do something prior to the machines - the pyramids are impressive not because we couldn't possibly make them today, but because they were made without modern machinery - but that doesn't mean I would consider building a large scale building without the use of cranes today anything other than insane.

For me what makes good art is either the above, or mostly the choice of subject and detail.
For me the Mona Lisa is not a good painting because it took a long time and was difficult to paint, but because the choice of expression is so enigmatic and not really seen in other paintings.

I saw a fantastic sculpture in Birmingham UK made out of knives from an amnesty. It must have taken hours to put together, but that's not what made it impressive. It was good art (to me) because of what it represented.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I don't know if my problem is related to X11 vs Wayland, but when I used Mint as my first distro it was fine on my PC. Then I got a laptop and everything looked tiny, I tried to use fractional scaling and found it was busted on Mint so I had to use font scaling, but that just looked ugly, and some programs would not respect neither fractional scaling, nor font scaling and I was so annoyed and I found out if I use KDE and maybe Wayland, this problem will be gone, so I switched to Tuxedo OS and now my problem is gone. The only issue I have now on Wayland is I was used all my life to switch keyboard layouts with SHIFT+ALT, but on Wayland for some reason only ALT+SHIFT works.

Overall, I don't mind that DEs are dropping X11, I'm still new to Linux, but I've had more issues with X11 than Wayland so I'm not sad to see it go. From what I've read both have some good and bad sides, X11 is too old and convoluted and fragmented and it can never have some of the features that Wayland has, Wayland also doesn't have some features and stability that X11 has, but in the long run Wayland can reach feature parity with X11 and even surpass it. I don't care about the war between both, I just want to be practical and to use what works for me.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Star Trek isn't something I associate with horror. Same with Star Wars, but I guess everything is possible.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: iiariThere is absolutely a place for a modern, truly outstanding jousting mini-game.

Screenshots are pretty, reviews are decent. I know nothing about it, though:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/3220180/Vestigia_Joust/

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: tpau

Quoting: PaldinoXAs is typical with these kinds of remasters, I think the ultra HD textures and modern lighting on top of the low-poly environments make the game look significantly WORSE than the original.

Yea i think if a game is too old, it needs to be done again from the ground up with a lot more polygons and fresh animations.
Otherwise it feels odd.

It's better to have a modern remaster for some of those games. Other such examples are OpenMW, fheroes2, VCMI and some other stuff like that which improve performance and compatibility with modern hardware.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Slaxer

Quoting: scaineAh, the "it's just a tool" argument. I'm not a fan of this.

Me neither, I hate it. It's the start of something that has largely only existed in science-fiction, and something that has never existed before in human history - but it's just a tool, they say. Yes, I'm aware that in its current state it's technically still not anything close to what the term "artificial intelligence" implies, but still. I feel like I'm being gaslit whenever someone says it.

Quoting: spymastermattIn particular your point about how you would make a bad table because you lack the skills, demonstrates for me exactly what I'm talking about. Here we have an actual game studio, who's professionals are using it as a tool and we are slating it because we assume suddenly that they've fired all the professionals and had people with no creative skill use the tool.

As an artist by trade, I'm not worried about AI replacing artists. That's not the problem. I just believe that the painstaking monotony of sculpting every scale on a dragon, or modeling the treads of a tire by hand, or having the discipline involved in painting something like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel over years is what makes art beautiful. There is always an element of pain in any form of creation, and it's the secret ingredient to good art. Hypothetically, if you knew that every piece of Renaissance art in Italy was actually just made by a machine, do you think it'd be worth flying over to Italy to see? They'd completely lose their significance. AI isn't going to enable artists to be more creative by liberating them from hard work. At the very least, its use by artists is eventually going to make artists lazier and less skilled at their craft. At most, it's going to make art pointless.

I can't do art to save my life. But I do a bit of writing, and I will say that if someone tells a large language model "Write me a book about this" and thinks it's theirs because they had an idea (which apparently does happen) . . . that's incredibly stupid. Most of the ideas in a book are created in the process of writing it; you might start with a basic framework, but it's while you're knocking out paragraph after paragraph that you make it rich, developing the ideas you had, coming up with new ones in the flow of making. You'll think "OK, gonna write a few pages about this" and a couple of pages in you realize there's this other stuff that can connect in. You realize who a character is as you write dialogue and it comes out a particular way. I wouldn't be surprised if art can be kind of like that too.

None of that is going to happen if you're just getting AI to fill up the word count.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I don't mind the AI part this much, I also don't like AI very much, but also use it sometimes and at the same time I don't care about it.

The problem I see with this game is the visuals look off-putting in the sense that your taxi is the same old, funky style and all the rest of the cars are modern day so it looks out of place. The older cars from the previous Crazy Taxi games made the world look and feel way more appealing.

Another thing that I noticed in the trailer is when they show in the rear view mirror the passenger making faces, it looked like some Disney Pixar animation and it looks to me like uncanny valley. The same facial expressions and body movements that are currently employed in Blizzard games like World of Warcraft and Overwatch that I really dislike.

If they just took something like Crazy Taxi 3 and remade the graphics in the same slightly cartoony style with vibrant colors and not too detailed like this is supposed to be it would be better. But currently nothing about this game makes me the least bit excited to look forward to playing it. Even if there was no AI, the game in a few words look like p**p.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: ChrisznixI still can playback those Amiga mod tracks from Defender in my head, and i remenmber to win the game with Wolfric the Wild by jousting only. Good times!

There is absolutely a place for a modern, truly outstanding jousting mini-game.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I'll probably never be good enough to see most of the biomes, if we're being honest, but real cool they're finally completing all the lands.

My hope is there'll be a round of overhauling parts of the game they haven't touched in a while, with the experience gained from doing all the later game stuff. Polish things up, maybe throw a few scraps to folks like me not good enough to get to the mid/late game, and so forth.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaineAh, the "it's just a tool" argument. I'm not a fan of this.

Me neither, I hate it. It's the start of something that has largely only existed in science-fiction, and something that has never existed before in human history - but it's just a tool, they say. Yes, I'm aware that in its current state it's technically still not anything close to what the term "artificial intelligence" implies, but still. I feel like I'm being gaslit whenever someone says it.

Quoting: spymastermattIn particular your point about how you would make a bad table because you lack the skills, demonstrates for me exactly what I'm talking about. Here we have an actual game studio, who's professionals are using it as a tool and we are slating it because we assume suddenly that they've fired all the professionals and had people with no creative skill use the tool.

As an artist by trade, I'm not worried about AI replacing artists. That's not the problem. I just believe that the painstaking monotony of sculpting every scale on a dragon, or modeling the treads of a tire by hand, or having the discipline involved in painting something like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel over years is what makes art beautiful. There is always an element of pain in any form of creation, and it's the secret ingredient to good art. Hypothetically, if you knew that every piece of Renaissance art in Italy was actually just made by a machine, do you think it'd be worth flying over to Italy to see? They'd completely lose their significance. AI isn't going to enable artists to be more creative by liberating them from hard work. At the very least, its use by artists is eventually going to make artists lazier and less skilled at their craft. At most, it's going to make art pointless.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Nic264

Quoting: dmoonfireWhile I'm sad because KDE Wayland doesn't handle saving the layout based on monitors (I want secondary only while plugged into the doc but the docked bar doesn't move with Wayland)

Is your concern still valid? I run Wayland and:

• When my laptop is unplugged my panel is on my internal screen.
• When it's plugged to my 2 external screens at my desk I get all 3 screens but only the external screens have panels.
• When I plug into my TV my internal screen turns off and my TV screen has my panel.

I don't remember exactly how I set it up, but I don't think I had to do anything special to get this behavior.

I have yet to get that to work and I disconnect my laptop from the dock but leave it running every day. Now, I'm a bit behind on NixOS 25.11 because I can't get updated to 26.05, but having the panel move doesn't work now.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaineAh, the "it's just a tool" argument. I'm not a fan of this.

I take some of your points (and god is it good to speak to someone with a reasoned discourse) but there's a few things I disagree with

Mostly the conflation of the use and the technology. It seems to me a lot of the flack for the use of GenAI comes from the way it's been used, spilling over into the use itself. Yes people are generating slop, yes people are using it to produce 'features' their users weren't asking for, but to say that makes the technology bad in any use case is overgeneralising and punishing people who use it creatively because there are people who don't.

In particular your point about how you would make a bad table because you lack the skills, demonstrates for me exactly what I'm talking about. Here we have an actual game studio, who's professionals are using it as a tool and we are slating it because we assume suddenly that they've fired all the professionals and had people with no creative skill use the tool.

And as @mindedie pointed out earlier, badly made games were a thing long before AI
From my perspective it also enables the opposite, people with good ideas for games, but without the skills / time / money to make art for it can now make their game.

The other thing that attracts a lot of scorn is people using it to create art "instead of employing an artist" but often times that's a false dichotomy. The choice is not AI art or human art, it's AI art or no art. The art in this context is simply not worth enough to warrant the cost of a human artist.

As for the illegally stolen reference material the AI uses, it's a tricky one for me personally because I don't pirate and I do believe that if you work to produce something you should get paid for it (provided there's a market of course). But I'm not entirely sure that the way AI has looked at art and uses it to generate more is all that different from the popularity of anime-style games. Humans tend to form their own style based on the things they've seen and they didn't necessarily buy all the artwork they've seen before letting it influence their style.

This is particularly relevant for this particular case, where the art the AI is replicating is likely their own material anyway. And it wildly depends on whether you have huge creative input and generate your own style, or have the machine copy someone else's, but copy-cat style art has existed forever and we used to call it "movements" rather than slate every artist as illegally copying their compatriots.

Regarding the electricity usage, people often seem to compare usage of AI against no usage. Taking the usage from this [article](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2506.17016v1) we see a usage of 1 Wh per image. If you assume that image would be generated by an artist using a modest setup, they're using 150 watts, so they would need to make the image in 24 seconds to be more energy efficient.

Water is a trickier one, and it seems insane to me that the evaporative cooling techniques that are used are not capturing the evaporated water once it has shed it's heat but:
According to [this paper](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/688cb407dc6688ed50878367/Water_use_in_data_centre_and_AI_report.pdf) from the UK government we get some interesting figures:

Globally, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that the data centre sector
consumes over 560 billion litres of water annually. Projections indicate this figure could
rise dramatically, reaching as high as 1,200 billion litres by 2030.13

So that puts it currently at 1.53 billion litres per day
The same article puts the current UK public water system alone at 14 billion litres per day (it's unclear whether this includes existing data centres) - Side note, they misquote it as 14,000 billion but if you follow the references it eventually leads [here](https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10248/CBP-10248.pdf) which clarifies

So yes the usage is significant and there are multiplying factors (data centres need more water when it's hot.... so do people) but I don't think it's beyond the ken of man to solve this

Perhaps the best thing we could do would be to either put a limit on people using it (particularly for frivolous things) or ensure that the companies making (cough) money from this are paying towards the solutions, thus forcing price rises, thus limiting usage etc etc

And who knows, maybe the only reason we're even getting another crazy taxi is because GenAI drops the cost to a point where it's worth taking the risk, rather than replicating the multiplayer, microtransaction, minor-change-to-a-franchise, format that guarantees to make it's money back, i.e. HumanSlop

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: charles222

Quoting: PoliticsOfStarvingWhat kind of games do people play in VR? Is it basically just FPS?

I never thought VR gaming would take off, but it seems people do want it. I guess when I think of VR I think of lame golf demos and lightsaber duels that my nephew showed me about 5 years ago.

For me the best part of VR was flying games. You're sitting down so there's no worries about room space really, and being able to actually look around (especially over your shoulder for combat) rules. Driving games would probably rock too.

100% this - Elite:Dangerous was an incredible upgrade on the pancake mode. Overload (a Descent-like) was superb too. As was Project Cars 2, although I'm not big on racing games, it was pretty amazing being to look around inside the cockpit as you drove.

In fact, with the exception of Alyx, I was a bit underwhelmed with most FPS-like games. Superhot was pretty cool, and Space Pirate Trainer, but anything that required you to do a lot of movement left me a bit cold.

Then there's all the beat-based games: Beat Saber, Groove Gunner, Pistol Whip, BoxVR, and the rest. They're great and you get a bit of a workout while you're playing too, but they require a tiny bit of space to stand up in.

I loved my stint into VR. I'm very excited to see how Frame shapes up.

The best thing about FPS games in VR, to me, was that you actually had to move the wands to aim. Feels really natural imo.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I want my children's children to see Linux with a 25% desktop user share.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: spymastermattSaying that a studio shouldn't use GenAI at all feels a bit to me like saying I won't buy furniture if the carpenter used a power saw

I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if it's the very artists people are trying to protect, who wants to use GenAI for the same reason... Is does donkey work faster.

Imagine you're creating the new assets for a game and you want to trial some ideas. GenAI allows you to give it what you have and direct some tweaks, and the easily visualise that in multiple in-game contexts. And yes, the bottom line is that takes some work away from artists by making each artist able to work quicker, but so did power tools for the trades.

I also think a lot of people seem to view GenAI as "give it a sentence and it will draw whatever you need" but if you've ever actually used it to make something where you have a specific vision, you know how much of the artistic direction still comes from you. Again, the power saw does not make the table, but it sure makes it easier

Ah, the "it's just a tool" argument. I'm not a fan of this. Powertools genuinely made very specific drudge work easier for skilled tradesmen, unlike genAI, which is more akin to robot automation taking jobs away from car factory workers. But the metaphor entirely breaks down when you realise that genAI isn't just taking jobs away, it's also spurring massive datacentre investment - which is impacting water and electricity supplies in the American (mostly) towns where they're being thrown up, while driving up prices of RAM and GPUs. It's spurring nuclear re-investment over a long term (25 years minimum). It's definitely ending jobs far faster than powertools ever could. And then there's the illegally obtained training data, the cost of training, the loss-leading pricing, the billionaire's and corpos funding all this, the top-heavy, bubble-like investment, the insane marketing, the force-fed product "enhancements" and everything else that's wrong with this car-crash tech.

One thing I do like about your analogy is this - if you give me, personally, a powersaw, I'll give you an absolutely shitty table because I have no idea about carpentry. And that's what we get with genAI - pure slop. It doesn't matter how much "artistic direction" you're going to fit into a prompt if you have no idea about art.

I'd prefer that creatives are given the freedom and time to not use the plagiarism machine and just create something that they're paid for and probably love doing, and we can enjoy that work without wondering how many households experienced brownouts and contaminated water to produce such shitty art.

I read a lot of fiction - mainly fantasy and sci-fi, right? I challenge you to ask anyone like me, "would you rather wait a year to read your favourite author's next book, or would you prefer to have genAI write a new book in the same style as that author, and you can read it next week?"

No-one - absolutely not a single reader - would choose genAI.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: charles222

Quoting: PoliticsOfStarvingWhat kind of games do people play in VR? Is it basically just FPS?

I never thought VR gaming would take off, but it seems people do want it. I guess when I think of VR I think of lame golf demos and lightsaber duels that my nephew showed me about 5 years ago.

For me the best part of VR was flying games. You're sitting down so there's no worries about room space really, and being able to actually look around (especially over your shoulder for combat) rules. Driving games would probably rock too.

100% this - Elite:Dangerous was an incredible upgrade on the pancake mode. Overload (a Descent-like) was superb too. As was Project Cars 2, although I'm not big on racing games, it was pretty amazing being to look around inside the cockpit as you drove.

In fact, with the exception of Alyx, I was a bit underwhelmed with most FPS-like games. Superhot was pretty cool, and Space Pirate Trainer, but anything that required you to do a lot of movement left me a bit cold.

Then there's all the beat-based games: Beat Saber, Groove Gunner, Pistol Whip, BoxVR, and the rest. They're great and you get a bit of a workout while you're playing too, but they require a tiny bit of space to stand up in.

I loved my stint into VR. I'm very excited to see how Frame shapes up.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: PoliticsOfStarvingWhat kind of games do people play in VR? Is it basically just FPS?

I never thought VR gaming would take off, but it seems people do want it. I guess when I think of VR I think of lame golf demos and lightsaber duels that my nephew showed me about 5 years ago.

For me the best part of VR was flying games. You're sitting down so there's no worries about room space really, and being able to actually look around (especially over your shoulder for combat) rules. Driving games would probably rock too.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Saying that a studio shouldn't use GenAI at all feels a bit to me like saying I won't buy furniture if the carpenter used a power saw

I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if it's the very artists people are trying to protect, who wants to use GenAI for the same reason... Is does donkey work faster.

Imagine you're creating the new assets for a game and you want to trial some ideas. GenAI allows you to give it what you have and direct some tweaks, and the easily visualise that in multiple in-game contexts. And yes, the bottom line is that takes some work away from artists by making each artist able to work quicker, but so did power tools for the trades.

I also think a lot of people seem to view GenAI as "give it a sentence and it will draw whatever you need" but if you've ever actually used it to make something where you have a specific vision, you know how much of the artistic direction still comes from you. Again, the power saw does not make the table, but it sure makes it easier

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: PaldinoXAs is typical with these kinds of remasters, I think the ultra HD textures and modern lighting on top of the low-poly environments make the game look significantly WORSE than the original.

Yea i think if a game is too old, it needs to be done again from the ground up with a lot more polygons and fresh animations.
Otherwise it feels odd.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment