Latest 30 Comments

I don't know what is worse, AI or popups... why not put it neatly in the infobox, like the protondb extension? It could just say AI / no AI and pop more info on click.

Looks like we have a competitor here. The license of the addon is MIT, you can start from that source code and build your version. You know... linux... open source... stuff like that .

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I don't know what is worse, AI or popups... why not put it neatly in the infobox, like the protondb extension? It could just say AI / no AI and pop more info on click.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I honestly prefer userscripts to "proper" browser extensions, since it's that much easier to check the actual code running on my end, but that's just preference doing the talking.
Still, if you want to the heads-up this provides, it's the tool needed for the job. Too bad you can't exactly add this to the Steam client itself, that would have made it even more useful for those who need it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

That's great news. The EPIC game store gave it away for free recently. I wonder if they'll do that again.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Remember reading about this years ago, glad to see they finally reached the finish line!

Hope they add splitscreen

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I didn't know there was a "like" button at the end of the articles. Can I hit it like 5 more times?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

It's also free on luna apparently (if you have amazon prime).

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I do also have an instinctive "So, this company wants to make more money by just having people . . . give it to them for free?" If I give money it's gonna be to a charity. GOG may like trying to blur the line to pretend to be sort of partly a charity . . . but they aren't.

"By September 2017, it was the largest publicly traded video game company in Poland, worth about US$2.3 billion, and by May 2020, had reached a valuation of US$8.1 billion, making it the largest video game company in Europe."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD_Projekt

I expect Ubisoft, for example, would also quite like people to just give them money on their Patreon.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

It seems like the people at Halo Studios saw SPv3 and figured they could make money doing the same thing.

I'll buy it anyway, though.

I'd prefer a remaster of Halo 3, still.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I'm skeptical of the Linux experience due to the unreliability of the Master Chief Collection

This is completely independent of the MCC though, it's on Unreal Engine 5 which runs just as well (poorly) in Linux as Windows.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

@Cybolic: that is exactly right. If GOG collaborated in some capacity with the community that would've been a different story, and an actual feather in the preservation cap they so eagerly try to wear.

Instead, GOG has a history of piggybacking on the community efforts. I get they technically don't owe anyone anything, because at best this is a grey area (say, apparently there was a case of a correct(ed) image of video game optical media the dumping party had no license to distribute - that GOG happily used once it became available), and at worst perhaps not legal (cracked copy protection measures leading to piracy), but that is part of the entire point: preservation is morally obvious, but potentially legally dubious.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I wish it will be good but I'm not trusting Stutter Engine 5.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I only played through Kingdoms & Castles one time from what I remember, but I definitely liked it. This new game looks like it'll be good as well.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

The non-existing Linux client is – for me – a plus and a huge downside: I'm happy that I have stand-alone installers that have not been tainted by Galaxy-related stuff that introduces additional bugs – like the infamous 15 (?) seconds start delay when Galaxy is not running that some Windows versions have compared to the Steam version due to the naive coding of GOG's Steam crack. The downside is obvious – due to the missing Linux client, there is no Linux version of GOG's Steam crack and that is the reason of the many missing native Linux versions on GOG. In that sense, the people moaning about missing achievements are the cause of missing native versions of games.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I'm skeptical of the Linux experience due to the unreliability of the Master Chief Collection when trying to play the campaign with friends. It works like 20% of the time, which is enough to make you believe it's possible, but 80% of the time you are just getting frustrated, wasting your time, and wishing you could get it back.

As to the game itself, yeah, I'd love to play it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I sure am seeing a lot of games in Unreal Engine 5 these days.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

If GOG made their preservation efforts open, instead of only for sale, I would be tempted to support them, but that's not what I'm seeing here. I'm seeing a corporate re-release program cosplaying as preservation.

By "making them open", I do not mean putting the games up for free, obviously, but some sort of effort to actually make sure the games continue to be able to run, outside of just buying them again.
This could be:

• Sharing compatible DOSBox configuration files for the original retail release of the game
• Sharing binary patches to ensure compatibility with a predefined Wine version
• Providing just some technical information about what issues a game might have with modern systems

in general, just anything that would actually help preservation efforts outside of them just being able to sell the game again.

Honestly, just a company statement about what they would do with their preservation efforts, should the company ever go under or discontinue the program, would go a long way to make it seem more like actual preservation.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

TheGamer recently [covered](https://www.thegamer.com/gog-private-investigators-off-the-grid-ip-rights-holders/) GOG's preservation efforts. In my opinion that's far more valuable than having a GNU/Linux client. Seriously, GOL doesn't have a client and yet people here are able to open a browser to comment on the article; they should be able to open a browser and download their games from GOG. In fact GOG is better than Steam at this considering you can't download your games off the Steam website.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I about spat out my drink when I saw the trailer uploaded to the official Playstation Youtube channel. Mark today as the day the Xbox died.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

With MS more and more enforcing user accounts it is about time for GOG to focus on supporting DRM-free OS...

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I am vehemently against game exclusivity but it's worrisome to see Halo go cross-platform. I'm glad it is but I worry that this is the death knell for Xbox. I don't think it'll be soon but Xbox hardware dying is not good for competition or consumers.

If Xbox dies, PlayStation will probably die too, since PlayStation has worse hardware and much more limited software.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Apparently this is gonna have sprinting and that has ruffled the feathers of some Halo fans. lol

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

@Caldathras: if a business needs donations (and they wouldn't need to ask otherwise, I'm not buying this PR speak) then said business is poorly run. Therefore, its preservation efforts could be in jeopardy, so to speak. Price the games you're selling to allow for the business growth you're intending, and not just for survival.

Just to be clear. I have hundreds of games on GOG, I support what they do... as a business, not as preservationists. And I certainly don't support attempts to manipulate and guilt-trip their customers (counting myself among them since day 1).

I say all this, because I care, and because I have close to 20 years invested into GOG. Can't believe I need to spell this out, but that's the Internet for you, I guess.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Hi, I do not know if this counts, but there is one you missed, Halo Custom Edition, it is Halo Combat Evolved multiplayer, but there is a mod to allow you to play the single player campaign

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

The whole idea that a for-profit company that frequently shifts its strategies, or gets new executives with different ideas about how to make a profit, is doing preservation has always seemed a bit underwhelming to me. If there is ever a conflict between "preservation" and "making or saving money" . . . which seems fairly likely . . . "preservation" is not the primary mission, "making money" is. And while some executives may value the idea that a good reputation may lead to more revenue, others pretty much do not. Preservation is a long term thing, and corporations are not entities that keep doing the same stuff in the long term.

I do also have an instinctive "So, this company wants to make more money by just having people . . . give it to them for free?" If I give money it's gonna be to a charity. GOG may like trying to blur the line to pretend to be sort of partly a charity . . . but they aren't. They're a thing that's there to feed money to the shareholders or CEO or whatever. And again, I don't see why I should be giving those guys my money for nothing.

This isn't about not liking GOG in particular or anything. Valve are one of my least-unfavourite companies, but I still wouldn't donate to them on Patreon either. If a company wants my money, it can offer me a product in return.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I'm glad they're doing this and I will definitely donate monthly. I'm surprised that some people in the thread are saying the games should be free if they ask for donations. They're a company who has consistently struggled to make a profit and losing GOG would be a big blow to gaming and preservation. Who else is going to work directly with developers and published from years and years ago to get the source etc? It's not perfect but it's a hell of a lot better than relying on fans exclusively. Sorry to beat a dead horse.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I am vehemently against game exclusivity but it's worrisome to see Halo go cross-platform. I'm glad it is but I worry that this is the death knell for Xbox. I don't think it'll be soon but Xbox hardware dying is not good for competition or consumers.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

@CatKiller

If you need your glasses to read a phone or a book then you'll also need your glasses for the Deck.

I need them for my 15.6" laptop screen too!

@Eike

they've got "reading helpers" (cheap glasses) in the drugstores

Yep. That's what I use.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

For those of you that are gatekeeping as to whether it is acceptable a for-profit business to ask for donations, I will respectfully remind you that this discussion has been repeated over and over again. Go and read the comments under this post:

GamingOnLinux: GOG Now Ask For Donations When You Buy Games

Personally, I see nothing wrong with a business asking for financial support on worthy side-projects. Under the Game Preservation Program, GOG will essentially be providing aftermarket support for games they did not make themselves -- presumably forever. The measly profit they have to share with the rights owner on retail sales is hardly going to support such an effort. From GOG's FAQ:

How is this different from just buying more games on GOG?

Buying games on GOG is always a great way to support both us and the publishers who bring their titles to the platform. GOG Patrons is a little different, as your monthly support goes directly to us, without being shared. It's a simple way to help us move faster, while your regular purchases continue to support the wider gaming ecosystem.

Also taken from their FAQ:

GOG Patrons isn't a lifeline. It's a way to go further, faster. Preservation takes time, resources, and people. And while we've always found a way, we know we can do even more: with your support.

For those of you taking the stance that businesses shouldn't be asking for donations, keep in mind that this is just your opinion and does not make it in any way mandatory for the world at large. Donations are optional. Choose to donate or not. That's your personal choice.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Keep in mind that for each game they sell they have to share the earnings with the developer&publisher of said game.
So having more money that does not have to be shared with others makes things easier.
If it is a monthly income, it makes it easier to plan how much they can spent on IP and staff and infrastructure. It isn't a bad idea.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment