We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Linux Game Awards May 2014 Open For Voting

By -
You have ~20 days to vote for your favourite project of the month for May. The projects are open source engines for commercial games/commercial content.

Nominated Projects
OpenMW
OpenXcom (my favourite)
Gemrb
ArxLibertatis
VCMI
OpenRA
OpenSpades
Doomsday engine
Stratagus
CaesarIA

You can vote for your favourite here.

The winner gets a banner in our image carousel on the home-page. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial
0 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
12 comments

Sslaxx Apr 5, 2014
OpenMW has my vote.
Anonymous Apr 5, 2014
OPENTTD
Heimdall Apr 5, 2014
Arx and Doomsday shouldn't be on there as they benefited from the source release of their games. The rest were built from the ground up.

I would pick CaesarIA and OpenMW, if I could pick two!
Liam Dawe Apr 5, 2014
Arx and Doomsday shouldn't be on there as they benefited from the source release of their games. The rest were built from the ground up.

I agree, but annoyingly I was told I was being "pedantic" by another site owner who is also an award supporter.
Samsai Apr 5, 2014
My vote definitely goes to OpenMW. That project is just amazing.
Heimdall Apr 5, 2014
Arx and Doomsday shouldn't be on there as they benefited from the source release of their games. The rest were built from the ground up.
I agree, but annoyingly I was told I was being "pedantic" by another site owner who is also an award supporter.

Well there is a big difference being given a basically finished project with Arx source and building a new engine from scratch a la CaesarIA and OpenMW. If that is pedantic, then so be it. I think they are belittling the achievement that the OpenMW people have achieved thus far.

Not to say that the Arx Liberal is project isn't cool. I love Arx and am glad they printed it to Linux. They just didn't have to do much work themselves, that was Arkane.
pheonton Apr 6, 2014
Arx and Doomsday shouldn't be on there as they benefited from the source release of their games. The rest were built from the ground up.

I would pick CaesarIA and OpenMW, if I could pick two!

Yes, you can!
Open Source Apr 8, 2014
Arx and Doomsday shouldn't be on there as they benefited from the source release of their games. The rest were built from the ground up.
I agree, but annoyingly I was told I was being "pedantic" by another site owner who is also an award supporter.
Well there is a big difference being given a basically finished project with Arx source and building a new engine from scratch a la CaesarIA and OpenMW. If that is pedantic, then so be it. I think they are belittling the achievement that the OpenMW people have achieved thus far.

Not to say that the Arx Liberal is project isn't cool. I love Arx and am glad they printed it to Linux. They just didn't have to do much work themselves, that was Arkane.

So what? They have had it easier. If that is your point then you are PEDANTIC. At the end it is Open Source and thats what counts.

If you want to complain, then complain to the companies which doesn't release the source for their games.
Liam Dawe Apr 8, 2014
Arx and Doomsday shouldn't be on there as they benefited from the source release of their games. The rest were built from the ground up.
I agree, but annoyingly I was told I was being "pedantic" by another site owner who is also an award supporter.
Well there is a big difference being given a basically finished project with Arx source and building a new engine from scratch a la CaesarIA and OpenMW. If that is pedantic, then so be it. I think they are belittling the achievement that the OpenMW people have achieved thus far.

Not to say that the Arx Liberal is project isn't cool. I love Arx and am glad they printed it to Linux. They just didn't have to do much work themselves, that was Arkane.
So what? They have had it easier. If that is your point then you are PEDANTIC. At the end it is Open Source and thats what counts.

If you want to complain, then complain to the companies which doesn't release the source for their games.

It is completely unfair to have projects like Arx in with projects like OpenXcom which is the point, Arx had the entire source code from the official developers handed out, it's in a league of its own.

I wasn't complaining about being pedantic, I like having a good attention to details. My point was made earlier, it's not right for it to be in a list with projects that started with nothing.
Open Source Apr 8, 2014
It is completely unfair to have projects like Arx in with projects like OpenXcom which is the point, Arx had the entire source code from the official developers handed out, it's in a league of its own.

I wasn't complaining about being pedantic, I like having a good attention to details. My point was made earlier, it's not right for it to be in a list with projects that started with nothing.

I got that, but where is it unfair? It is still a lot of work to port the code, or do you think you just fire up the compiler and it is done?

Sure they didn't have to start from scratch, but the games are released as Open Source, and that is what counts.

I didn't say that you are complaining about being pedantic. What I ment is that if you are complaining about that the other projects didn't have the source from the "original" game, then please go and complain to the company which holds the source without releasing it.
Liam Dawe Apr 8, 2014
I am not complaining about the other projects not having the source code from the original games *sigh* and I think you know that already.

I was saying it's not fair to the projects that didn't have the source code to start off with. They should have been in different voting polls to be fair to them, that is just my opinion. I didn't get a say in it either due to communication issues I didn't even know there were discussions on the projects being included.

Also, this argument is so boring it's unreal, I am not an open-source zealot, so no I won't be bugging companies to release sources. If you want to go right ahead, now move on from this argument I have made my point.
DrMcCoy Apr 8, 2014
I won't be bugging companies to release sources

You really should do that, though. :P
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.