Support us on Patreon
PayPal
Out of the ashes of my controversial thoughts on AMD in the post highlighting their new mini gaming box comes an editorial about AMD's graphics drivers.
I am no stranger to calling AMD out on bad drivers, I am not saying they are bad right now as I haven't personally used them for around a year now, but in the past they have been bad.
With AMD shaking up the industry with their Mantle API it does beg the question, where will AMD go with their drivers on Linux?
We have Mantle which they haven't even confirmed if they will support it on Linux yet. Mantle is the API that's supposed to give performance gains over traditional graphics drivers. Now that's a great idea in theory, but it has already been shot down somewhat by the fact that AMD themselves along with Intel and Nvidia all said you can unlock many multiples of performance gains like that with OpenGL.
We then have Catalyst their closed-source graphics drivers that probably have some sort of middle-ware stopping them from open-sourcing it. I doubt that is the only reason they probably have certain techniques they wouldn't want Nvidia seeing which is just business.
Then we come to their open-source drivers which according to reports from nearly everyone who has stated they have used them that they have improved dramatically. I've seen benchmarks over time from Phoronix which backs this this up too, sadly I can't link any as trying to find an AMD benchmark of old vs new drivers wasn't easy.
Will AMD drop their Catalyst drivers for general desktop Linux in favour of their open-source drivers on Linux and keep Catalyst for things like professional work stations?
It sure would make a lot of people happy, there are masses of upsides to having fully FOSS (Free and open-source software) graphics drivers like not having to install anything yourself, it just comes with the system and works right away. This mostly already happens though, all we need is better day 1 support of newer graphics cards in the open-source drivers which brings me to my next point.
What would be great to see is some sort of driver updater for open-source drivers like Intel have, that would be great for AMD open-source users. Especially if you use a distribution on a 6-month or longer release cycle, if you picked yourself up a shiny new AMD card that wasn't currently supported, but gained support in a release a month before you don't want to wait another couple months for the new distro, having that software to just update the open-source drivers without fiddling around manually with repositories or PPA's and the like would be fantastic.
I have to hand it to AMD (and Intel) for providing good open-source support, Nvidia is lacking heavily in that category.
So, what do you the readers think AMD will do in future? Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
I am no stranger to calling AMD out on bad drivers, I am not saying they are bad right now as I haven't personally used them for around a year now, but in the past they have been bad.
With AMD shaking up the industry with their Mantle API it does beg the question, where will AMD go with their drivers on Linux?
We have Mantle which they haven't even confirmed if they will support it on Linux yet. Mantle is the API that's supposed to give performance gains over traditional graphics drivers. Now that's a great idea in theory, but it has already been shot down somewhat by the fact that AMD themselves along with Intel and Nvidia all said you can unlock many multiples of performance gains like that with OpenGL.
We then have Catalyst their closed-source graphics drivers that probably have some sort of middle-ware stopping them from open-sourcing it. I doubt that is the only reason they probably have certain techniques they wouldn't want Nvidia seeing which is just business.
Then we come to their open-source drivers which according to reports from nearly everyone who has stated they have used them that they have improved dramatically. I've seen benchmarks over time from Phoronix which backs this this up too, sadly I can't link any as trying to find an AMD benchmark of old vs new drivers wasn't easy.
Will AMD drop their Catalyst drivers for general desktop Linux in favour of their open-source drivers on Linux and keep Catalyst for things like professional work stations?
It sure would make a lot of people happy, there are masses of upsides to having fully FOSS (Free and open-source software) graphics drivers like not having to install anything yourself, it just comes with the system and works right away. This mostly already happens though, all we need is better day 1 support of newer graphics cards in the open-source drivers which brings me to my next point.
What would be great to see is some sort of driver updater for open-source drivers like Intel have, that would be great for AMD open-source users. Especially if you use a distribution on a 6-month or longer release cycle, if you picked yourself up a shiny new AMD card that wasn't currently supported, but gained support in a release a month before you don't want to wait another couple months for the new distro, having that software to just update the open-source drivers without fiddling around manually with repositories or PPA's and the like would be fantastic.
I have to hand it to AMD (and Intel) for providing good open-source support, Nvidia is lacking heavily in that category.
So, what do you the readers think AMD will do in future? Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
0 Likes
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
Quotefuture however doesnt indeed look good if they dont plan to refresh their FX series..I agree with this. I have been watching them, and there hasn't been any news of something new from them. I'm worried.
Graphics wise, the 14.4 Catalyst drivers in Ubuntu 14.04 with my HD5750 have been good. This isn't at 1080p though (running at 1600x900). The nightmare that was AMD Catalyst 2012 seems to be no more, but that's only with my limited runtime so far (barely a week). FPS still dips like nuts in L4D2, but can reach above 100fps as well. The open source drivers work with Unity games now, but I haven't actually tested them for FPS performance.
It would seem AMD are improving, but at a snails pace. I am eager to see the open source drivers flourish, as it would mean just plug and play. That would be the best case scenario. The Open Source drivers seem to lack any form of UI now though, so there's no centralised way for me to check temps/driver version/card number/GPU performance settings and so on so forth like you could with Catalyst or Nvidia's GUI program.
0 Likes
Quoting: GuestJust to drop another comment in here: don't forget about RAM affecting game performance. Slow RAM + fast CPU can be much worse than fast RAM + slow CPU, regardless of core count. It counts doubly with integrated graphics.
I am guessing this was in reply to me with the serious sam 3 example?
fx-8350 has ddr3 1800
i7 has ddr3 1600
but you are right ram does affect game performance. This just makes the fx-8350 look even worse lol
I feel pretty buthurt over having purchased that chip. I watch my partner playing the same games as me with often lower settings and or not as smooth :( at least I made it quiet now for her. They should supply a much bigger fan an heatsink like intel does, so the fan doesn't have to spin at the speed of light when it's under load.
0 Likes
Right now I'm quite content with my Phenom II X4 - Radeon HD6670 - fglrx combination.
Until mid-2013 however, it sucked to own an AMD system. Every fglrx update would make me break out in sweat in anticipation of a borked system. That's not the case anymore.
Yes, I wouldn't complain about speedier development also, but that's about it.
On the pro side is what kept me an AMD customer since a long time: They hit the sweet spot considering bang-for-buck and power consumption.
A lot of AMD products beat competitors that cost double the price.
Energy ? My above mentioned configuration (with the HD6670 being passively cooled): 75 W idle, <130 W on load. And it's by no means a weak system.
As said, not for performance enthusiasts, surely. But me, trying to build the most efficient system I can, I do hope that AMDs Open-Source efforts gain more traction and will sort out some of the remaining weaknesses.
God forbid a PC hardware monopoly. The gone by Microsoft era would look harmless and innovative in comparison.
Until mid-2013 however, it sucked to own an AMD system. Every fglrx update would make me break out in sweat in anticipation of a borked system. That's not the case anymore.
Yes, I wouldn't complain about speedier development also, but that's about it.
On the pro side is what kept me an AMD customer since a long time: They hit the sweet spot considering bang-for-buck and power consumption.
A lot of AMD products beat competitors that cost double the price.
Energy ? My above mentioned configuration (with the HD6670 being passively cooled): 75 W idle, <130 W on load. And it's by no means a weak system.
As said, not for performance enthusiasts, surely. But me, trying to build the most efficient system I can, I do hope that AMDs Open-Source efforts gain more traction and will sort out some of the remaining weaknesses.
God forbid a PC hardware monopoly. The gone by Microsoft era would look harmless and innovative in comparison.
0 Likes
QuoteSo, what do you the readers think AMD will do in future?Limited to the FOSS/proprietary drivers matter the answer is: the usual? AMD invested a lot in FOSS drivers so they won't abandon it but they still need a few years to reach at least OpenGL/OpenCL parity with Catalyst, so for a few years probably nothing will change, except maybe trying to reduce duplicate work from driver teams as they revealed at GDC2014 but that's just an internal detail that won't affect the final user significantly.
0 Likes
Quoting: SkullyI don't see a real future for AMD at all anymore. Their cpu's well under perform while generating alot more heat and use more power. Their GPU drivers suck in Linux compared to Nvidia. And even on windows you have more issues. Currently your better off just buying the best Intel cpu and Nvidia gpu you can with the budget you have for your build.\\
Unless they pull something out of their butts, the fx-8350 cpu I recently/regrettably bought for my missus will be the last sale from me. I should of just got her an i3 or low i5 for same price. It would perform better for gaming and wouldn't become a room heater while sounding like a it's about to take off into the sky. I had to buy an aftermarket cooler for it and disable core boosting to shut it up, or my partner wanted me to rip it out and put her old parts back in lol.
P.S I used to be a lover of AMD's cpu's. Never liked ATI cards though, due to same issues they still suffer from with AMD.
I have that CPU and it rocks, of course I compile my own software for up to 70% gains, hell I encode at close to 300 fps on this monster. use arch (ABS) or gentoo and this set this beast free. As for their cards, I have had many and haven't been let down since I stopped using Windows since the opensause support handles older cards and catalyst for the newones... I also own an intel i3 with built in video and my llano destroys it for gaming. that's a full gen after i3 mind you. oh but what lies we tell ourselves huh?
0 Likes
Quoting: GuestAnyway, my post was because generally if you're trimming down the cost, a cheaper CPU for better RAM is normally worth it for games, regardless which company (cheaper AMD vs costly AMD, cheaper Intel vs costly Intel, or a mix thereof).
Do you have anything to back this up? I have seen quite a few benchmarks of games with different kinds of ram and for afaik it makes no difference unless you have an igp. Linustechtips did some testing a few weeks ago, his results were that there is no difference between 1333mhz and 2100mhz in terms of gaming performance.
0 Likes
Quoting: SabunThe Open Source drivers seem to lack any form of UI now though, so there's no centralised way for me to check temps/driver version/card number/GPU performance settings and so on so forth like you could with Catalyst or Nvidia's GUI program.
You might be interested in this:
https://github.com/marazmista/radeon-profile
1 Likes, Who?
LOL Intel CPU + nVidia GPU is for serious gamers. End of.
1 Likes, Who?
Quoting: SkullyYes Linux is multithread and more cores win, but that doesn't apply to games yet. Most games are still using 1, sometimes 2 and rarely 4. So most games run *** due to poor single core performance and they also stink at floating point calculations due to having a shared fpu unit in each module.
Then take into account that the fx-8350 runs at 3.9ghz and boosts to 4.1, while the i7 is 3.6 with boost to 3.9. An I5 would be everybit as good for gaming as my i7 due to games using 4 or less cores.
eg. Serious sam 3 on Linux. In the performance options cpu performance, my fx8350 has to be set to lowest or framerate drops below 60 alot. My i7 can have it on ultra. same distro, same gpu
i dunno what you talking about really... check those videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eu8Sekdb-IE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIVGwj1_Qno
FPS difference in games is minimal.. and when it comes to running other things at the same time when gaming then AMD pulls ahead quite a lot compared to same priced CPUs from intel
also i dunno what issues you had then... i have SS3 on ultra and my 8320 at 4.2ghz with no such drops..
probably you had ondemand governor when those issues happened.. this is known to suck under linux with amd cpus.
edit: also theres __GL_THREADED_OPTIMIZATIONS=1 to make some singlethreaded games at least run rendering on second thread.. which boosts performance quite a bit on AMD CPUs that suck on single core stuff.. And when you play windows games in wine theres CSMT patchset that does that.. + luckly many games starting to use more than 2 cores lately.. spcialy thanks to new console generation that has the same AMD CPUs... like it or not but many games come from consoles to PC...
0 Likes
Quoting: HamishQuoting: SabunThe Open Source drivers seem to lack any form of UI now though, so there's no centralised way for me to check temps/driver version/card number/GPU performance settings and so on so forth like you could with Catalyst or Nvidia's GUI program.You might be interested in this:
https://github.com/marazmista/radeon-profile
Wow, that is pretty cool! Thanks Hamish :)
0 Likes
See more from me