Support us on Patreon
PayPal
AMD have released a new driver for their GPUs and because I happen to own one I decided to do a test run with it by running my standard set of benchmarks to see what improvements, if any, there are.
First of all, Catalyst 15.9 fixes a problem that existed in 15.7 which was the inability to install the driver after a kernel update in Ubuntu 15.04. That means that 15.9 is now installable on such systems without extensive patching. This is definitely a very good thing, since something like a GPU driver shouldn't be a preventing factor for kernel security updates. It apparently still doesn't work with the brand new 4.x series kernels but I'm quite happy with my 3.19 at the moment.
Let's talk about raw performance next. To be entirely honest with you, there isn't really all that much to talk about, as you might see from the following graphs.
As you can see, 15.9 doesn't really offer any performance improvement in this set of benchmarks. I also ran a Dirt: Showdown test which also saw no improvement in performance. The changelist for 15.9 notes two fixes for Dirt: Showdown, one for corruption and one for a crash, but neither of these changes affected the overall performance. Also, keep in mind that Dirt: Showdown's benchmark mode is not scientifically accurate, since there is always a little bit of a visual variance between runs.
The changelog also mentioned Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. On Catalyst that game has performed relatively poorly (as in, a lot slower than Nvidia blob) and this patch apparently creates an optimization profile for CS:GO. I haven't been able to collect any hard information about CS:GO's performance on 15.7 and I don't have any concrete data now. But a quick Arms Race match on the map Monastery showed a framerate between 80 and 120 FPS.
I also quickly tried Shadow of Mordor and Company of Heroes 2, both of which have been particularly troublesome on AMD. Sadly, neither has improved performance. The patch notes say that COH2 shouldn't crash anymore, but my whole system went down when attempting to run the performance test, so I can't really agree with AMD here. Some Shadow of Mordor corruption has allegedly been fixed but the performance is still as poor as it was previously.
Overall, Catalyst 15.9 doesn't really bring anything too interesting. The most positive thing I can say about it is that it works. The fact that it works can be something quite big for those that are on 15.04 like myself, but don't expect massive performance improvements in anything but possibly CS:GO. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
First of all, Catalyst 15.9 fixes a problem that existed in 15.7 which was the inability to install the driver after a kernel update in Ubuntu 15.04. That means that 15.9 is now installable on such systems without extensive patching. This is definitely a very good thing, since something like a GPU driver shouldn't be a preventing factor for kernel security updates. It apparently still doesn't work with the brand new 4.x series kernels but I'm quite happy with my 3.19 at the moment.
Let's talk about raw performance next. To be entirely honest with you, there isn't really all that much to talk about, as you might see from the following graphs.
As you can see, 15.9 doesn't really offer any performance improvement in this set of benchmarks. I also ran a Dirt: Showdown test which also saw no improvement in performance. The changelist for 15.9 notes two fixes for Dirt: Showdown, one for corruption and one for a crash, but neither of these changes affected the overall performance. Also, keep in mind that Dirt: Showdown's benchmark mode is not scientifically accurate, since there is always a little bit of a visual variance between runs.
The changelog also mentioned Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. On Catalyst that game has performed relatively poorly (as in, a lot slower than Nvidia blob) and this patch apparently creates an optimization profile for CS:GO. I haven't been able to collect any hard information about CS:GO's performance on 15.7 and I don't have any concrete data now. But a quick Arms Race match on the map Monastery showed a framerate between 80 and 120 FPS.
I also quickly tried Shadow of Mordor and Company of Heroes 2, both of which have been particularly troublesome on AMD. Sadly, neither has improved performance. The patch notes say that COH2 shouldn't crash anymore, but my whole system went down when attempting to run the performance test, so I can't really agree with AMD here. Some Shadow of Mordor corruption has allegedly been fixed but the performance is still as poor as it was previously.
Overall, Catalyst 15.9 doesn't really bring anything too interesting. The most positive thing I can say about it is that it works. The fact that it works can be something quite big for those that are on 15.04 like myself, but don't expect massive performance improvements in anything but possibly CS:GO. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
0 Likes
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
A benchmark from Phoronix shows the same, only CS:GO saw improvement:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd-catalyst-159&num=1
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd-catalyst-159&num=1
0 Likes
If you want to test something (new), why use Ubuntu or any pre-built Distro with comparably ancient packages to begin with?
Just use Arch or if you don't want to know your system, use Antergos.
Switching between drivers is not a major problem, it's just that you have to replace the whole stack currently.
It will get better though, once they build upon a common base.
Apart from that, other than higher OpenGL-version support, Catalyst was always either unstable or delivered worse performance on my machine(s), compared to the open source stack. And using it with a rolling release distro is a major pain in the arse, if you use it in daily life.
Last edited by Maelrane on 17 September 2015 at 6:23 am UTC
Just use Arch or if you don't want to know your system, use Antergos.
Switching between drivers is not a major problem, it's just that you have to replace the whole stack currently.
It will get better though, once they build upon a common base.
Apart from that, other than higher OpenGL-version support, Catalyst was always either unstable or delivered worse performance on my machine(s), compared to the open source stack. And using it with a rolling release distro is a major pain in the arse, if you use it in daily life.
Last edited by Maelrane on 17 September 2015 at 6:23 am UTC
0 Likes
ElectricPrism Sep 17, 2015
Time to drop another $200 - $400 for another Linux PC in da house.
I have to admit that AMD has be tempted. These articles are really helpful its just sad that the sum AMD will be out is $600-800 by the end of this upgrade cycle for me.
I have to admit that AMD has be tempted. These articles are really helpful its just sad that the sum AMD will be out is $600-800 by the end of this upgrade cycle for me.
0 Likes
Quoting: SabunQuoting: maodzedunI use this REPO - it's Oibaf + LLVM3.7:
https://launchpad.net/~paulo-miguel-dias/+archive/ubuntu/mesa
I don't mean to be a bother, but can you list out the steps you took to install this PPA and unlock OpenGL 4 support?
I'm on an R9 390 (Hawaii) card, and with this PPA I am still stuck at OpenGL 3 on Ubuntu 15.04 64bit.
To be honest I haven't tested it lately. Ever since I got a second 290x I've been booting up Linux less and less.
0 Likes
See more from me