It seems a leak (the rest is very Windows focused) from slides showing off AMD Crimson is reporting much better Linux performance in certain games.
The way I'm reading it, is not that the games are say "112%" (double and then some) better, but 12% better. I think it's using marketing speak to look better than it is, but with that said it's still some impressive improvements. They have needed it, as we have known for a long time that AMD Catalyst hasn't been competing very well with Nvidia.
Looks like the real stuff is due out today, so we will keep you posted if we hear any more! Exciting though, and hopefully this isn't just new per-game optimizations. I really hope those are just example games they tested, and that they have been able to do general driver optimizations on Linux.
The way I'm reading it, is not that the games are say "112%" (double and then some) better, but 12% better. I think it's using marketing speak to look better than it is, but with that said it's still some impressive improvements. They have needed it, as we have known for a long time that AMD Catalyst hasn't been competing very well with Nvidia.
Looks like the real stuff is due out today, so we will keep you posted if we hear any more! Exciting though, and hopefully this isn't just new per-game optimizations. I really hope those are just example games they tested, and that they have been able to do general driver optimizations on Linux.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
Quoting: TheBossQuoting: Xpanderstill better than nothing, hopefully more games benefit than only those on the picture
I honestly think it's per-game optimizations, which makes me wonder why the heck they haven't focused on some of the new bigger releases, like Alien and Mordor?
Probably those optimization/profiles were done some time ago in the driver development for the release and that's the slide they have probably leaving those 2 games out in the cold. Just a guess. There are probably other reasons as well, however if I had to guess that is just a small bone being thrown out.
Edit:
However I don't think this is really anything to be excited about. Take the 112% bioshock... that's ~4+ fps higher at 40 and ~7+fps at 60... I wish this game didn't make me seasick I would love to finish it but it played alright (not great) on catalyst ~55FPS last time I tried so I guess every little bit helps. As far as the >100% metric, it was actually tech sites that made it popular as it exaggerates a couple of FPS to make cards look further apart, so it's kinda silly to call out AMD over using the metric.
Last edited by Xzyl on 24 November 2015 at 12:24 pm UTC
0 Likes
It doesn't say which card these numbers are for, or what settings. It's really hard to conclude anything from this.
Also, if I understand correctly, with the new drivers Catalyst runs on top of the open-source AMDGPU driver? If so, how much of these gains are from which part of the driver? If it's really per-game optimization, it's likely all proprietary.
Also, if I understand correctly, with the new drivers Catalyst runs on top of the open-source AMDGPU driver? If so, how much of these gains are from which part of the driver? If it's really per-game optimization, it's likely all proprietary.
0 Likes
New drivers are out now
http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop?os=Linux+x86_64
Last edited by pete910 on 24 November 2015 at 1:29 pm UTC
http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop?os=Linux+x86_64
Last edited by pete910 on 24 November 2015 at 1:29 pm UTC
1 Likes, Who?
Well we don't get the flashy new UI by the looks of it :'(
Would it have been that hard to point the build target to linux......
Would it have been that hard to point the build target to linux......
0 Likes
Quoting: GuestQuoting: pete910Well we don't get the flashy new UI by the looks of it :'(
Would it have been that hard to point the build target to linux......
At a guess, there's a lot more than a UI. It has to interact with the driver directly, after all, so no, it wouldn't be a simple matter to "point the build target to linux". Though I do agree that a better interface is desirable, I do think that it should be done after amdgpu + userspace is properly up & running.
I understand that it talks directly to the driver, but still it's not as of they don't know what to call is it. It's their driver!.
Waiting on AMD is like waiting for the rapture tbh. By the time they've done AMDGPU have it running well + the new UI in place + freesync most of the last AMD user hold outs will have gone green. To be honest come next gen round I may be one of those that jump ship
To be frank the lack of new UI don't bother me, You set what you need to set then never open it again normally. It's the lack of freesync support that pisses me off. Luckily I still haven't gone that route. was looking for a GC + new monitor for my son this xmass , was going the 390 route. It now maybe a green team variant which I don't really want to do.
Sorry, ranting/venting a bit
0 Likes
The new driver compiled fine on mine with the 4.14 kernel that i'm on.
Did a quick test of metro rdeux on stock 290x @ 1440p
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1511249-HA-290XCRIMS38
Anyone with a NV card do a comparison, I thought I had done some with previous driver versions but guess not
Did a quick test of metro rdeux on stock 290x @ 1440p
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1511249-HA-290XCRIMS38
Anyone with a NV card do a comparison, I thought I had done some with previous driver versions but guess not
0 Likes
Support for GPUs pre-GCN has dropped in this drivers version
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-Crimson-Pre-GCN
Last edited by mrdeathjr on 24 November 2015 at 3:08 pm UTC
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-Crimson-Pre-GCN
Last edited by mrdeathjr on 24 November 2015 at 3:08 pm UTC
0 Likes
Quoting: pete910The new driver compiled fine on mine with the 4.14 kernel that i'm on.
Did a quick test of metro rdeux on stock 290x @ 1440p
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1511249-HA-290XCRIMS38
Anyone with a NV card do a comparison, I thought I had done some with previous driver versions but guess not
with a crappy AMD CPU and not so high end 970
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1511242-HA-1511249HA90
1 Likes, Who?
Still room for improvement then by the looks of it :P
0 Likes
More information about pre GCN cards moved to legacy
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9815/amd-moves-pre-gcn-gpus-to-legacy
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9815/amd-moves-pre-gcn-gpus-to-legacy
0 Likes
See more from me