Planetary Annihilation has a rather interesting history, and John Comes the Design Director at Uber Entertainment did a write up on it all.
You can see the write up here on gamasutra.
My own thoughts
I have a very love-hate relationship with the game, mainly just due to how unpolished it feels even after this long. You still get black screen issues now and then when the UI just doesn't appear, which can really annoy you. It seems to happen more often for AMD GPU users, as I hear repeating reports of it.
For a game that's supposed to be such a massive strategy title, with different planets, and lots and lots of units it's really not well optimised for when you have lots of units. I've been in plenty of games where the enemy sent a huge army towards me, or me towards them, and the game slows down to an absolute crawl.
Another issue, is that playing it totally offline had higher system requirements (and wasn't in the full release, it was added later), as the game so heavily relied on Uber Entertainment servers. This did annoy people, and pushed away people on the lower end who didn't want to play online. Although if you're looking to play a game like this, the requirements for the single-player seemed okay to me.
Their second Kickstarter
QuoteUnhappy Planetary Annihilation fans descended on comments and forums blasting us for how we handled our last project. Two weeks later we shut down the project and were forced to reduce staff.
Uber Entertainment launched a second Kickstarter very quickly after the official PA release for another strategy title named "Human Resources". This had unhappy Planetary Annihilation players pouring in giving them grief about it. Rightly so in my opinion, as PA wasn't even close to being stable at this point and they really hadn't proven themselves in my eyes.
We really don't have any other strategy titles like it on Linux, and since I've been a fan of such games since Total Annihilation I think this is why I am willing to put up with the issues it has. I have 57 hrs on record for Planetary Annihilation, and 2.9 hrs on record for TITANS (which was released after), so you can see my love of it faltered after a while due to the issues. Splitting the already quite small playerbase with TITANS was also a very iffy decision. I still think it's great that they did it and I was happy as a Kickstarter backer to get it for free, but it gave people a reason to dislike them.
I think they focused on features too much, without spending enough time really polishing the experience, and this soured it for me. Too many niggling issues still left in the game, especially on the Linux side. I can't count the amount of times the UI has crashed in some way to make the game unplayable.
An important and incredibly obvious point:
QuoteMake sure the costs of stretch goals are covered in the funding level.
I imagine a lot of developers don't really think about the actual cost involved when they announce stretch-goals. Most I've seen simply use big fancy features to get to reasonably small advances in the total, and they really don't work out the time and money involved in reality.
He makes another important point:
QuoteThe general public doesn’t understand what it takes to make a game. Do not expect them to learn it.
It's a very true point, but it's also down to developers to give reasonable promises. Letting in feature creep is also an issue while developing. It also links into the above point.
A big issue was communication, they didn't really have a proper community manager for some time, and even when they did the communication wasn't all that good. I visited the forums nearly daily, and in that time multiple times a day to see how frustrated people got at the silence.
With that said, I do still love the game, and the idea behind it. It has lots of little things that make it such a unique experience. It may not have perfect execution (what game does?), and I would still rather have it than not have it. The ChronoCam is such an excellent idea, and can really help you learn from others tactics. Being able to pick a specific part of a game and watch it, rewind, and so on. That feature alone makes it pretty interesting. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
0 Likes
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
Quoting: GuestThese are workarounds that should instead have real fixes implemented by the devs.Yes, but I have nether issue and without anyone reporting that they still exist they're not going to get any attention. I know they've added rules for specific hardware and drivers in the past. And they're both take extra time to address as they are issues in the third party middle-ware layer (Coherent UI.
Quoting: GuestSince you seem to be a fan of the game, I can't fathom that you haven't come across endless numbers of bugs and lack of polish, because it's all easy to come across when spending even a short time with the game.I've played the game since beta where I've reported and had an number fixed. The game now works great for me with only a couple of very minor issues (that can be found listed in my mods). Fell free to check out my twitch stream when I get back to playing next week. ;)
Quoting: GuestI don't game on Windows so I can't comment if there are more bugs in the Linux version or not.Nether do I. But I'm on Teamspeak with players that do a lot and I was under the impression that is was comparable till seeing the few complaints here. I've been surprised just how many Linux players I run into all the time.
1 Likes, Who?
Quoting: GuestTo be fair, anyone can claim they are in financial trouble and could be squandering their money and being fraudulent. Without seeing their finances, we can't know for sure what they are doing with the millions upon millions of dollars they've gotten.Hmmh, OK. I guess there's the difference in our views then :)
...
From the dev's ego and behavior so far, I highly doubt it, and to me it smells like greed and fraud.
I personally see a small company that had to layoff people to be able to continue on business. Bug fixing is important but it doesn't bring them money so they have to work on new content to be able to pay wages etc. I don't see them as evil people who are enjoying their millions (which I don't think they have) and doesn't care about their customers.
Just like Über Entertainment I hope Egosoft is able to continue making games. Both has had really tough times. I'm worried if they want to spend any money for Linux versions for now since the market share is still very tiny and maintaining Linux version could be too costly.
Last edited by edqe on 7 January 2016 at 7:30 pm UTC
1 Likes, Who?
Actually, the first kickstarter which disappointed me. I still have two out there which could, but this one certainly was the first.
I repsect what they tried, and it really could have been a great title. Sadly, it didn't fit the standards for a good gameplay for me either, and still feels a little unfinished to me when playing it.
It was not a huge budget for at title like this (the rather opposite, a low goal), and I did doubt it in the beginning. They really had high bars on this one. I'd have expected them to at least need 6m to make a title like this actually work well for me, and we'll never know where it would have been that they hit the mark where I'd say it's a good game. It's in my opinion pretty impressive what they achieved with the kind of budget they had.
Their mistake was to put in too huge features for such a small budget. Hopefully they'll learn out of this, I can spare the few bucks for their training on how to properly plan the financing of a product.
I repsect what they tried, and it really could have been a great title. Sadly, it didn't fit the standards for a good gameplay for me either, and still feels a little unfinished to me when playing it.
It was not a huge budget for at title like this (the rather opposite, a low goal), and I did doubt it in the beginning. They really had high bars on this one. I'd have expected them to at least need 6m to make a title like this actually work well for me, and we'll never know where it would have been that they hit the mark where I'd say it's a good game. It's in my opinion pretty impressive what they achieved with the kind of budget they had.
Their mistake was to put in too huge features for such a small budget. Hopefully they'll learn out of this, I can spare the few bucks for their training on how to properly plan the financing of a product.
0 Likes
Quoting: STiATHopefully they'll learn out of this, I can spare the few bucks for their training on how to properly plan the financing of a product.
Yes that would be great, however the article linked sounds more like they see themselves as innocent victims of an internet mob... which makes it seem unlikely that they learned anything :(
0 Likes
Patreon
PayPal
See more from me