Oh baby, here we go. Thanks to Feral Interactive, XCOM 2 has been officially released today for SteamOS & Linux. Disclosure: Copy provided by Feral Interactive
I’m a massive fan of the original UFO: Enemy Unknown (X-COM: UFO Defense) game and the re-make XCOM which was ported over by Feral Interactive, so to have XCOM 2 on day 1 is excellent. I'm going to be honest, this has been one of the most exciting games to come in the history of Linux gaming for me. Sadly, the initial release has not lived up to my expectations.
Note: It’s another Linux port where Intel and AMD are not currently supported. It doesn’t mean it won’t work, it’s just not supported right now.
The good news is the multiplayer is cross platform! As they announced on Twitter:
When #XCOM2 launches tomorrow on Mac & Linux it will feature cross-platform multiplayer across Mac, Linux and Windows! You ready for that?
— Feral Interactive (@feralgames) February 4, 2016
System requirements:
Recommended
OS: Ubuntu 14.04.2 64-bit or Steam OS
Processor: Intel i7 series
RAM: 8GB
Graphics: 2GB NVIDIA 960
Minimum
OS: Ubuntu 14.04.2 64-bit or Steam OS
Processor: Intel i3-3225 3.3 GHz
RAM: 4GB
Graphics: 1GB NVIDIA 650
Port report
Obviously take this with a pinch of salt considering my hardware, Intel i7 and Nvidia 980ti. Nvidia driver version 355.11.
I've only been able to spend a few hours with it today, so a full review will come later.
It's another title to use Feral Interactive's new launcher system and it's quite nice. I love any game that allows me to pick resolution, and what monitor before it launches and tries deciding it all for me and screwing itself up. Although, that's not really an issue for me now I'm on a single monitor, but for people using more than one monitor it's going to help a lot.
The auto detect graphical settings sets everything to the lowest it can, even with my 980ti so I had to fiddle about with all that at the start. That was slightly annoying, but not a major issue as they do have a "preset" option, so I cranked it up to High.
We seem to only have either disabled, or FXAA for anti aliasing options. FXAA looks pretty bad, so I'm not too happy about it. I know Windows has MSAA, so I would have liked that option on Linux even if it hit performance more, it would still look a lot better. See how it looks on High at 1920x1080 below:
You can clearly see jagged edges all over my soldier, not looking good at all.
2560x1440
This has been giving me between 35-55FPS which isn't too bad, but quite a bit lower than I expected for my card.
The first time I fired a weapon the game stuttered so badly it basically skipped the entire firing sequence, and jumped to a dead Advent soldier on the floor. I heard it all happen, but didn't get to see it which was disappointing for sure. It seems to happen each time a new type of weapon is fired, this is a common issue with Unreal Engine games (Storm United and Borderlands 2 both suffer from it). I really do hope Feral manage to nail this issue down, as it's quite concerning as you miss a fair bit of action. I won't spoil it (yet), but there's an incident with a grenade, and it became a three part slideshow.
An issue that the Linux version seems to share with Windows is how long it takes for each turn to start, sometimes there are random pauses before anything happens, as if the game is loading and trying to catch up with itself. I've seen it happen for other reviews videos, so it's not a Linux issue. The game just doesn't seem to be optimised.
Another issue (which is a game issue, and not Linux related) is the camera, and how terrible it is at times, here's a perfect example:
Do you know what's going on? I don't. I mean I know someone died, but I didn't see shit. They really need auto rotation. They needed it in XCOM, and they need it here too.
There is a bit of stutter when you're scrolling around, it's not too bad, but hopefully something that can be worked on.
When you get back to your base, the performance goes down even more. I was getting 30FPS and below while viewing my base.
1920x1080
I decided to tone it down to 1920x1080 resolution to see what the difference was. There was zero difference on the base view, with it still struggling to hit 30FPS on High.
During a mission the FPS at this resolution was a bit more acceptable between 40-70, but it does dip right down to 40 quite often. It's a little more acceptable, but still quite bad.
I would definitely turn off the action camera, it's distracting and slows things down even more. This is also true on Windows, and I hated it in the first XCOM too.
I turned the game down even further to Medium settings, but still keeping it at 1920x1080 (I refuse to game at lower than that on a 980ti). It's now properly acceptable hovering between 70-90+ FPS. If the AA options weren't so terrible, it would be slightly more enjoyable on Medium.
I failed the first proper mission (the one after the tutorial) twice, so it's exactly what I expected. It's good to be back, it's damn good, but wow is the difficulty higher.
Once you have played it for a while, if you quit the game entirely to the desktop and then re-load it, the stuttering is somewhat improved. This is usually down to cache issues (reloading it with stuff already loaded and ready), but I honestly don't care what's causing it and why it can't be done before the actual gameplay. The problem is, it just should be done before you play it as it gives a terrible impression.
If you do come across this issue below, load a saved game from before you entered the mission and it fixed it for me.
There's also the issue of the colour of the game, compare these images to the image at the top of the article. The shadows here are purple and surfaces are bright blue. Feral are aware and say it happens on Windows too, but they are waiting to hear from Firaxis if it's intentional or not. I really don't think it is (as it looks terrible and it's a completely different colour palette), but I will wait and see.
The game also seems to pause when it doesn't have focus, which can be annoying at times.
Ending thoughts: Performance really is a let down, as is the missing MSAA option. The time it takes parts of the turns to complete is frustratingly slow, as you wait for the game to realize something has happened. I will take another proper look at it after some patches, and when I have put more time into it. Honestly, for the moment I really would hold off and wait for some performance patches.
The actual gameplay is good though, the performance is just all over the place.
About the game (Official)
Earth has changed. Twenty years have passed since world leaders offered an unconditional surrender to alien forces. XCOM, the planet’s last line of defense, was left decimated and scattered. Now, in XCOM 2, the aliens rule Earth, building shining cities that promise a brilliant future for humanity on the surface, while concealing a sinister agenda and eliminating all who dissent from their new order.
Only those who live at the edges of the world have a margin of freedom. Here, a force gathers once again to stand up for humanity. Always on the run, and facing impossible odds, the remnant XCOM forces must find a way to ignite a global resistance, and eliminate the alien threat once and for all.
The game can also be purchased with a Steam Controller (with 40% off!) as it has native integration, so hopefully when the performance is sorted I can sit back on my sofa and relax with my Steam Machine.
You can find XCOM 2 on Humble Store and Steam.
That's how it it currently. Developers are forced to release a game, and even if you buy Disk version (not the digital one) after month or 2 you have to download 10GB patch to be able to play the game. This is current reality of the gaming industry. Let's not blame Feral for now, let's give them time to make game golden.
BTW. on both in-game screenshot game looks awful. Where are all the shadows? Where is the source of the light? Yet another reason to wait with the hardware upgrade while there are other high costs in my life.
EDIT: Ok, on last screenshot there are shadows, but for some reason shadow of each person starts not directly from his leg, but some space after. I bet this is a Linux port version issue, so this is something that Feral will need to work on.
Hope the game is golden soon, and we all will have great game to enjoy!
Last edited by wojtek88 on 5 February 2016 at 8:46 am UTC
Good on Feral for giving mesa some love! I look forward to seeing if there'll be further improvements with regards to stuttering and a few frame drops.
I would definitely turn off the action camera, it's distracting and slows things down even more.Turn off action cam? Madness! It was one of the features that made the first game so good! A welcome break from that static isometric view that makes every game look like a board game, now we get down there and see the action and wonderful models and animations in all their glory.
Updated with a screenshot of another issue the Linux client has.
That's not an issue with the game! The second screenshot you're in "incognito mode" as you haven't attacked anyone yet (see the face in the top centre of the screen). It would be good if you updated that part of the review as it looks like you mistook a gameplay option for a bug :)
I guess you might have been a little tired last night :)
Last edited by edddeduck_feral on 5 February 2016 at 9:42 am UTC
I'm sorry for you guys who have to suffer through such bad performance :-(
Updated with a screenshot of another issue the Linux client has.
That's not an issue with the game! The second screenshot you're in "incognito mode" as you haven't attacked anyone yet (see the face in the top centre of the screen). It would be good if you updated that part of the review as it looks like you mistook a gameplay option for a bug :)
I guess you might have been a little tired last night :)
Afraid not, compare the first image in the article, with this image I just took of the same save game but in action mode.
http://imgur.com/RPUE3h8
The shadows are purple, everything else is rather blue.
Yes I did. Still if the game does not perform well on any combination of hardware or software, there's no reason to blame anyone but the developer. If you feel the need to blame someone that is.But in this case, if you look at the graphical demands of the game and the performance output on the higher end cards, one may think otherwise that this isn't just about bugs but driver issue as well.Blaming drivers for performance problems across operating systems and graphics hardware vendors is disingenuous at best.
You read the article?
The Unreal 3 Engine was never properly ported to Linux, and every game using it under-performs.This doesn't explain why the game "under-performs" on Windows and Mac as well, at least according to various reviewers.
Yes I did. Still if the game does not perform well on any combination of hardware or software, there's no reason to blame anyone but the developer. If you feel the need to blame someone that is.But in this case, if you look at the graphical demands of the game and the performance output on the higher end cards, one may think otherwise that this isn't just about bugs but driver issue as well.Blaming drivers for performance problems across operating systems and graphics hardware vendors is disingenuous at best.
You read the article?
Just to clear things up mate, there's no "blaming" going on here.
According to the article, the norm seems to be that most game releases are broken and that most of it were fixed by patching the drivers. The point here is, it's not just about the developer releasing fixes but also the need of new optimized drivers as well to combat the issue.
Last edited by Polochamps on 5 February 2016 at 11:07 am UTC
yeah, performance isnt too great :( game seems good though and its playable, but those heavy drops make it pretty bad
View video on youtube.com
I believe windows have the same issue, if I recall Total biscuit had some "complains" about that.
Xcom enemy within had the same issue, it got patched later on and now it runs smooth.
I will be there ^^.
http://store.steampowered.com/bundle/217/
(Is there any information howw long the offer will last?)
Last edited by Eike on 5 February 2016 at 11:16 am UTC
According to the article, the norm seems to be that most game releases are broken and that most of it were fixed by patching the drivers.Yes, but that does not mean that there was a problem with the drivers to begin with. I'm sure none of them are perfect, but that doesn't explain why pretty much all big-budget AAA games release unfinished and unoptimized lately.
It is an unfortunate fact that modern (ogl/d3d) GPU drivers have to include increasingly massive collections of work-arounds and kludges to circumvent bugs and programming mistakes in game graphics code, which leads and indeed has led to complicated drivers with very unpredictable behaviour. This has been repeatedly confirmed by various industry insiders.
The design of the new, low-level graphics APIs will undoubtedly alleviate this problem due to the much "leaner" drivers, but there is still some wiggle-room so time will tell if they actually solve this problem completely.
According to the article, the norm seems to be that most game releases are broken and that most of it were fixed by patching the drivers.Yes, but that does not mean that there was a problem with the drivers to begin with.
No one is saying that. The issue seems that both resources are needed to address the problem.
I'm sure none of them are perfect, but that doesn't explain why pretty much all big-budget AAA games release unfinished and unoptimized lately.
It is an unfortunate fact that modern (ogl/d3d) GPU drivers have to include increasingly massive collections of work-arounds and kludges to circumvent bugs and programming mistakes in game graphics code, which leads and indeed has led to complicated drivers with very unpredictable behaviour. This has been repeatedly confirmed by various industry insiders.
The design of the new, low-level graphics APIs will undoubtedly alleviate this problem due to the much "leaner" drivers, but there is still some wiggle-room so time will tell if they actually solve this problem completely.
Yeah I agree! And there would be less overhead (if none at all). That is, if most developers would embrace the new API as a new standard.
Last edited by Polochamps on 5 February 2016 at 12:01 pm UTC
The Unreal 3 Engine was never properly ported to Linux, and every game using it under-performs.This doesn't explain why the game "under-performs" on Windows and Mac as well, at least according to various reviewers.
If it underperform also in Windows it's not the case of a bad port, it's the game that need to be fixed.
See more from me