Check out our Monthly Survey Page to see what our users are running.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.
image
Feral Interactive have done it again! Tomb Raider is now officially available for Linux, and I have some thoughts and a port report available for you. It’s also the first ever game on Linux to use TressFX.

Disclosure & Notice: Key provided by Feral Interactive. There will be spoilers in the review and video.

First of all, a reminder of the requirements:
Minimum
OS Ubuntu 14.04 or SteamOS 2.0 (64-bit)
Processor Intel i3 or AMD FX-6300
RAM 4GB
Graphics card 1GB
NVIDIA GeForce 640 (driver version 364.12) or 2GB AMD R7 260X (Driver version MESA 11.2)

Recommended
OS Ubuntu 14.04 or SteamOS 2.0 (64-bit)
Processor Intel i5
RAM 8GB
Graphics card 3GB
NVIDIA GeForce 760 (Driver version 364.12)

If you're on Ubuntu/Mint you can grab a fresh Nvidia driver from this ppa.

Port Report
Reminder: Your machine will be different.

It’s another title to use Feral’s new Linux launcher which I really love. Being able to select your monitor and resolution before the game loads is a really big help when you have more than one monitor. The amount of games that either start in a poor resolution, or on the wrong monitor can be infuriating, so Feral have taken steps to improve their games for us.

The game has full support for AMD’s TressFX, which is essentially fancy hair. Personally, I think it’s awesome and it does make characters hair look a lot more realistic, but it can tank performance down quite a lot.

I’ve mainly done my testing on the High preset, but with TressFX turned off. I feel this gives me the best performance without sacrificing a good looking game experience. I have been mainly testing it at 1920x1080 resolution.

I have to say the performance is generally quite good (on my machine), but certain areas can be quite bad. I was initially very impressed during the heavy action going on towards the start, as the framerate seemed to stay mostly above 100FPS.

Once I got outside, the performance did dip down to 60-70FPS, which is still pretty great considering the settings. The problem is that later on in the game when you’re in certain areas I’ve seen my FPS dive bomb down to 20-30FPS. It does feels sluggish at times too, but luckily I’ve come across very little stutter. That’s only in a few certain areas though, it will level out again when you leave them.

The performance will shoot right up when you’re inside certain enclosed areas, as there’s not so much going on. You do go into a few caves and buildings quite often, so parts of the game will perform a lot better than others.

I have no doubt Feral will work on the performance issues with certain areas. They have so far proven themselves to be capable developers with updates to their ports bringing performance enhances and general fixes. They don't get a free pass though, the game does have performance issues.

Update: I did the livestream as promised, and you could see the performance issues at times. I will try to get the video up soon.

Benchmarks
The game has a built-in benchmark mode, so I will let the numbers speak louder than my ramblings. One important thing to note is that the actual game is quite a bit heavier than the benchmark, but it will at least give you an indicator of performance.
image

image

TressFX
Visual differences between Normal and TressFX (my image, taken on Linux of course):
image

My thoughts on it
Tomb Raider is a very different breed compared to the previous games in the series, and I’ve played a number of them so I am well aware of the differences. I’m not the type that gets annoyed when games are rebooted, and I think the developers created a really great game here. You’re introduced to a bunch of characters at the start, but you never really see anyone but Lara grow in the game. It would have been interesting to see more of them, but this is really about showing how Lara Croft evolved into a hardened survivor.

The game is set on a beautifully presented weather-torn island where disaster is common, but you decided to set sail for it anyway. What’s a game without a really stupid decision like that anyway?

I’ve tested it with both mouse & keyboard and a Steam Controller and both work beautifully. I’ve had zero issues with the input for the game so it should satisfy you however you wish to play it.

The control system is beautifully simple, from climbing to jumping ledges and firing off rope arrows for a make-shift ziplines. Just generally running around taking it all in is great, especially great since the environments are so beautifully designed. You also end up doing a bit of mountaineering; jumping from ledges and hooking into mountains. It’s very cool, and certainly gets your heart going.

Instead of the battle-hardened Lara we knew from before, we play as a much more emotional and believable character. This is your first real expedition, and you have something to prove. The voice actor for Lara is very good, really convincing of the emotions she is going through and it really helps you stay interested in what’s happening to her.

The game is far more brutal than I remember! Nothing about this game eases you into it. The explosive intro scene is awesome and really draws you in from the moment you press that Play button.

The island itself has some really beautiful environment art with the mixture of shipwrecks, old warplanes tangled up and the incredible skybox is really something. You will also come across all sorts of wildlife which can make you jump a little when you’re not expecting it.

Tomb Raider certainly won’t be for everyone, as there’s a fair amount of quick-time button mashing events. They aren’t too bad, some of them are even pretty damn intense thanks to the action going on and the excellent vocal work by the actor playing Lara (Camilla Luddington). Things like hit F now, or mash this button until something else happens, if you don’t time it right you will be forced to do it again. They tend to be evenly spaced out overall, as the majority of the game has you running, leaping and shooting your way through it.

Some mechanics actually feel quite similar to Shadow of Mordor, especially the climbing and finding artefacts/relics that you need to rotate to find clues. I actually quite like hunting around for them and seeing any story to go with them.

It also has a survival sense vision to help you find useful items, which also reminds me of the view you get in Shadow of Mordor to seek things out. It’s worth noting that even though we are getting this game after Mordor, Tomb Raider actually came out before it.

There’s a moment about an hour in where you’re trapped, alone, and you have wolves circling around you in the bushes. You’re armed with your bow, you don’t know where they will jump out from and lightning is going off, it’s incredibly tense, and probably one of my favourite moments in a computer game in recent years.

The combat really does feel really good, with an assortment of different weapons available to you and stealth is even an option. You don’t always want to go in guns blazing, you do have the option at times to also sneak up behind unsuspecting victims for a nice stealth kill. Stealth killing isn’t a quick and easy affair either, you will need to be careful there’s no one else around keeping an eye out. The cover system is automatic too and you duck down behind cover whenever it’s available. This is quite useful as it allows you to really focus on your enemies and not hitting the right button to be sure you’re in cover. You can even distract enemies from behind cover by shooting an arrow at a wall or object near them, or even set them ablaze by shooting out an oil lamp for maximum brutality.

There are elements of the original games here too, as there are an assortment of secret tombs to explore for certain rewards like XP and maps. Although the tombs are generally optional from what I have seen they are worth a little exploring. There are seven in total, so you will need to keep an eye out for them.

I haven’t had a chance to play the multiplayer yet since the game has only just come out for Linux, but I will be sure to test it out and report back to you on that when there’s enough people playing to get a good idea.

Overall, it’s a fantastic game that really draws you in from the moment you load it up and it’s just incredible to have Lara natively on Linux. Although, I would like to see performance improved in a few certain areas.

You can do it, Lara. After all, you're a Croft

You can buy Tomb Raider on the Feral Store, or directly from Steam. I can recommend it personally as I’ve been loving it.

I will be livestreaming it tonight on my personal Twitch channel: https://www.twitch.tv/naughtysquid Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
0 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
113 comments
Page: «6/6
  Go to:

manus76 Apr 29, 2016
@GirlGamer
Yes, the game goes lower in performance later on while in real action (so it does in Windows), but I still find those numbers way off. I also find a bit suspicious what he said about differences in image quality, (because there's really no difference) and makes me think think that he didn't bother too much to assure identical settings/scenes in his tests.


The other explanations then would be the test procedure was flawed, or the author lied. Neither of which seems to make sense because ComputerBase is a respected site with years of experience of testing and benchmarking. Additionally they regularly publish articles about linux and there was even one titled 'Gaming on linux? Why not?'
When the author says he can see differences in image quality (very minor) and you say you can't, we've reached an impasse.
Further, number of people (here, on phoronix and computerbase forum) playing linux version of the game report poor performance in some particularly intensive stages of the game, despite having good benchmark numbers.


Last edited by manus76 on 29 April 2016 at 5:12 pm UTC
mrdeathjr Apr 29, 2016
In fact, I'm using the 352.63 propietary driver and the game works...
Here are the benchmarks in a machine with Ubuntu 14.04.3 64bit,1920x1080p, Zotac GTX960AMP! Edition 2GB, Corei5 4690K (no overclock), 2x4GB 1866 at 1600CL8:

High preset, Vsync OFF:



Runs very good

However why dont apply some OC your 4690K????, any frecuency between 4.2Ghz and 4.5Ghz must be offer fps boost in most native games

^_^


Last edited by mrdeathjr on 29 April 2016 at 5:28 pm UTC
Comandante Ñoñardo Apr 29, 2016
Runs very good

However why dont apply some OC your 4690K????, any frecuency between 4.2Ghz and 4.5Ghz must be offer fps boost in most native games

^_^

Because a few things:
This was just an experiment. The real graphics card of this PC is a Gigabyte GTX 750ti Low profile. The mobo is a Gigabyte H97N-WIFI.
I removed the mobo from the HTPC case just for this.
This case can not allow the temps of an overclocked i5 4690K with the stock cooler (This is the PC I assembled for my mother).

The PSU of this machine is Seasonic SS 350-SFE and I don't want to overload it paired with the GTX 960 of the experiment and an overclocked i5..

I'm gonna do the benchmark again, this time with the GTX 750ti Low profile.
PublicNuisance Apr 30, 2016
With FGLRX I got a minimum of mid 30 FPS on lowest settings at 1080P. With the game maxed out my min FPS was 15 ish. On Open Source I couldn't get the game to run. It would start to run and quit after a second or two. I only played for a few minutes on FGLRX. No exactly scientific but enough for a gut reaction.

My rig: R9 390, FX-8350 @ 4.5 GHz, 16GB DDR3-2133 RAM, 250GB Samsung Evo SSD, Linux Mint 17.3 64


Last edited by PublicNuisance on 30 April 2016 at 1:35 am UTC
Mblackwell Apr 30, 2016
I'm not sure about performance on this one... it looks like CPU is thrashing around, maybe fighting with the driver a bit. GPU utilization seems good, but the game seems to max out a couple of CPU cores and then do some bouncing about.

I don't have anything really to analyze with beyond looking at frame times and such, but someone with more tools could probably poke around and find out what's really going on.
c3224 Apr 30, 2016
Comment from above YT video:
"Framerate too high to be playable on Windows version; Linux wins again!"

luv it! :)

View video on youtube.com


Last edited by c3224 on 30 April 2016 at 10:10 pm UTC
Comandante Ñoñardo Apr 30, 2016
Benchmark on Ubuntu 14.04 64BIT. "NORMAL" preset. Vsync ON @intel i5 4690K GIGABYTE GTX750ti Low profile. 352.63 propietary driver


In game I don't have that framerate all the time, but it NEVER goes below the solid 30FPS.


Now, the Benchmark on Ubuntu 14.04 64BIT. "HIGH" preset. Vsync ON @intel i5 4690K GIGABYTE GTX750ti Low profile. 352.63 propietary driver



On ULTRA is UMPLAYABLE with this GPU...But on Normal or even High details, this card is a IDEAL for a compact Steam Machine.
Mblackwell May 1, 2016
Why are we being disingenuous with Wine benchmarks? Wine can't run any of the D3D11 features.

This is the game running on Ultra/Ultimate with D3D11 only features (Tessellation and TressFX) disabled.


Edit:

For the sake of comparison here's Ultimate (TressFX and Tessellation on)


Here's Tessellation off, TressFX on


Here's Ultra (TressFX off, Tessellation on)



Last edited by Mblackwell on 1 May 2016 at 1:01 am UTC
Mushufaza May 2, 2016
add on steam __GL_THREADED_OPTIMIZATIONS=1 %command%
Mblackwell May 2, 2016
In the benchmark at least that only gained me a couple of fps. Does it make a larger difference in-game?


Last edited by Mblackwell on 2 May 2016 at 4:14 pm UTC
STiAT May 3, 2016
Played it a bit .. it's not clumpsy, but some scenes certainly have huge dps drops on my GTX 770. Anyway, so far the game is fun, and it does not happen that often :-).
leillo1975 May 4, 2016
I did the game benchmarks in my other old computer:

Xubuntu 15.10 64bits
Intel Core 2 4400 (2x2Ghz)
3GB DDR2 RAM
Nvidia GT440 1GB (352 driver, 1280x1024) IT WORKS!!!!

LOW
Min: 20.5
Max: 42.1
AVG: 34.0

MEDIUM
Min: 17.8
Max: 32.6
AVG: 26.8

HIGH:
Min: 15.7
Max: 27.6
AVG: 21.3

The game is playable in Low settings. I think that with a little better Dual CPU, and a better 400 nvidia series GPU, the game could be playable in medium or high settings


Last edited by leillo1975 on 4 May 2016 at 1:30 pm UTC
leillo1975 May 9, 2016
More Benchmarks in old computers. I try the game in a laptop with this configuration:

-Intel Core 2 Duo CPU P7450 (2.13Ghz x2)
-GeForce GT 230M (340 driver)---------->>>> Works!?!?
-4GB RAM
-Ubuntu 16.04 64Bits

FPS In LOW settings:
Min: 15.6
Max: 24.9
AVG: 20.4

I know that play in this very, very old machine is stupid, but I did a bechmark and this are the results:

Pentium 4 3Ghz HyperThreading
2GB RAM DDR1 (400)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 AGP 512MB (Mesa 11.2 OGL 3.0) with 1440x900 resolution
Linux Lite 3.0 Beta 32bits (based in Ubuntu 16.04)

Min: 1.7
Max: 6.7
AVG: 4.5

Obviously this test is only for Benchmarking purpouses. I'm very surprised that the game runs.


Last edited by leillo1975 on 12 May 2016 at 11:25 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.