Valve have put up SteamVR for Linux officially in Beta form and they are keen to stress that this is a development release.
You will need to run the latest Steam Beta Client for it to work at all, so be sure to opt-in if you want to play around with it.
VR on Linux will exclusively use Vulkan, so it's going to be a pretty good push for Vulkan if VR becomes more popular. Vulkan is likely one of the pieces of the puzzle that held it back, since Vulkan itself and the drivers are still so new.
On NVIDIA, you need to have the 375.27.10 "Developer Beta Driver", which can be found here. There's also this PPA for Ubuntu users. It's likely it needs some newer Vulkan extensions not found in the current stable drivers.
For AMD GPU owners, you need a very recent build of the open source radv driver (Mesa), Valve provide this pre-release on their github page.
Intel GPUs are not supported and it's probable it will be a long time until they are, since VR generally requires some beefy hardware to run smoothly. It's possible they may work in future, but I imagine the Intel 'anv' Vulkan driver needs more work done.
Also, you will likely need some updated udev rules, but all of that and more can be read about on their github page for it.
It's exciting to finally see VR on Linux starting to become a real reality now. I just wish the hardware wasn't so damn expensive. It will likely be a long time before I can afford a headset myself to review, but hopefully someone can send us a review unit to hold onto.
Thanks for tweeting it to me Dennis. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
You will need to run the latest Steam Beta Client for it to work at all, so be sure to opt-in if you want to play around with it.
VR on Linux will exclusively use Vulkan, so it's going to be a pretty good push for Vulkan if VR becomes more popular. Vulkan is likely one of the pieces of the puzzle that held it back, since Vulkan itself and the drivers are still so new.
On NVIDIA, you need to have the 375.27.10 "Developer Beta Driver", which can be found here. There's also this PPA for Ubuntu users. It's likely it needs some newer Vulkan extensions not found in the current stable drivers.
For AMD GPU owners, you need a very recent build of the open source radv driver (Mesa), Valve provide this pre-release on their github page.
Intel GPUs are not supported and it's probable it will be a long time until they are, since VR generally requires some beefy hardware to run smoothly. It's possible they may work in future, but I imagine the Intel 'anv' Vulkan driver needs more work done.
Also, you will likely need some updated udev rules, but all of that and more can be read about on their github page for it.
It's exciting to finally see VR on Linux starting to become a real reality now. I just wish the hardware wasn't so damn expensive. It will likely be a long time before I can afford a headset myself to review, but hopefully someone can send us a review unit to hold onto.
Thanks for tweeting it to me Dennis. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
That's very nice, and I wasn't expecting it so early.
Now, I need moar monies... :P
Both to upgrade my computer, and to buy a headset. I think it won't happen anytime soon.
But this is still early adopter stuff. I fully expect the hardware to be better and cheaper in a few years.
Now, I need moar monies... :P
Both to upgrade my computer, and to buy a headset. I think it won't happen anytime soon.
But this is still early adopter stuff. I fully expect the hardware to be better and cheaper in a few years.
2 Likes, Who?
slaapliedje Feb 22, 2017
Quoting: M@yeulCThat's very nice, and I wasn't expecting it so early.
Now, I need moar monies... :P
Both to upgrade my computer, and to buy a headset. I think it won't happen anytime soon.
But this is still early adopter stuff. I fully expect the hardware to be better and cheaper in a few years.
I was discussing this with a co-worker who has a Vive with the newer/smaller box. Mine is this gigantic pre-order box.
So improvements they've already done;
1) Storage box is much smaller.
2) Newer Vives come with a '3-in-1' flat cable instead of the giant fat one. Depending on who you ask it may or not be 'better'.
3) New Lighthouses (with one instead of two fans) are on their way out, so in theory there will be a price drop with them.
4) Prototype controllers have been seen which look absolutely fantastic, especially compared to the Oculus Touch.
5) Wireless attachments (not sure on battery life, but it would certainly rock for the room scale stuff!)
HTC themselves have stated that they don't see a 'Vive 2' until 2 or 3 more years.
People hoping for double 4k screens don't realize that current computer hardware simply isn't up to the task.
1 Likes, Who?
slaapliedje Feb 22, 2017
Quoting: burnallCan't wait to try War Thunder and Dirt in VR.
I didn't think Dirt or War Thunder supported VR? Software definitely needs to support VR for it to really work well. But wow, Dirt would be AWESOME, I haven't tried War Thunder yet. Project Cars requires some serious tweaking for it to be nice in VR (mainly sizing up your cockpit).
0 Likes
TheRiddick Feb 22, 2017
You can get a 4k VR headset from Pimax I think its called, they also intend to release a bigger product in a next few months that has two 4k screens in it and FULL tracking setup. It will take time before there drivers get good but 4k with full tracking might be enough to convince me to get one.
BTW the 4k Pimax one is like $400usd so not bad. However only directional tracking :(
I still laugh at people with this concept that computers can't do 4k VR, its like listening to OLD people comment about tech...
Last edited by TheRiddick on 22 February 2017 at 8:13 am UTC
BTW the 4k Pimax one is like $400usd so not bad. However only directional tracking :(
I still laugh at people with this concept that computers can't do 4k VR, its like listening to OLD people comment about tech...
Last edited by TheRiddick on 22 February 2017 at 8:13 am UTC
0 Likes
I tried with my linux with nvidia 375.26, and works! but at indirect mode, it's the lastest drivers i guess that works on direct mode. Setup room was not working on my computer... and i had a huge tracking lag(more than 1 second) it made me feel sick so fast. Yeah, i should update udev and drivers, but i had 10 minutes before leave to work. At back i will try everything!
I bought it on preorder, and belive me, this wait was really long.
I bought it on preorder, and belive me, this wait was really long.
3 Likes, Who?
Quoting: TheRiddickI still laugh at people with this concept that computers can't do 4k VR, its like listening to OLD people comment about tech...Most computers sold today can't do VR at the current resolutions. Resolution increase is quadratic on CPU/GPU resources needed, and that literally goes double* for VR.
It's all well and good to release a headset that has a 4k display per eye, and even do tricks with upsampling/resampling, but when your hardware and software can only maintain 90 fps by rendering at "standard" resolution or less, there's not much real benefit.
[*] Some things do support "single pass" stereo rendering, which reduces the overhead in ideal cases.
2 Likes, Who?
TheRiddick Feb 22, 2017
VR is not targeted at the average users except in the case of PS:VR, there is no expectation that people with mid range pc's will experience VR. Also VR only needs to render 1 image, those rendering 2 images have just not moved on.
0 Likes
Quoting: TheRiddickVR is not targeted at the average users except in the case of PS:VR, there is no expectation that people with mid range pc's will experience VR. Also VR only needs to render 1 image, those rendering 2 images have just not moved on.
1 image? what you talk about? it's stereoscopic and 90 stable frames per second. 4k in VR is just a dream atm. Maybe with foveated rendering. But actual VR HMD's doesnt have it.
Last edited by bubexel on 22 February 2017 at 3:14 pm UTC
1 Likes, Who?
Quoting: bubexelQuoting: TheRiddickVR is not targeted at the average users except in the case of PS:VR, there is no expectation that people with mid range pc's will experience VR. Also VR only needs to render 1 image, those rendering 2 images have just not moved on.
1 image? what you talk about? it's stereoscopic and 90 stable frames per second. 4k in VR is just a dream atm. Maybe with foveated rendering. But actual VR HMD's doesnt have it.
I think he's talking about multiview technologies, that allow for example to process a vertex shader only once for both eyes. The GPU needs to support it, though. It is also more complex (read: almost? impossible, AFAIK) to do with the fragment shader.
But there are numerous difficulties to overcome with this (stereo reflections come to my mind, though multiview can end up being faster, albeit more complicated, AFAIK), so it also has a cost.
There are a lot of techniques that can boost rendering speed, but we are not going to see state-of-the-art graphics at multiple-K (say, 8 per eye) resolution any time soon, just because the state of the art will progress with GPU power (and resolution increase is quadratic). But we will probably see current-gen graphics on those. Plus, artists always try to use the limitations creatively, which can be a plus, in the end.
0 Likes
Patreon
PayPal
See more from me