Sad news, it seems GOG Galaxy won't actually be released for Linux any time soon. They may eventually get to it, but it's "not a priority".
For those that don't know, GOG now have their own Steam-like client called Galaxy. It offers things like Cloud Saves, an in-game overlay, bandwidth limiting, capturing screenshots, desktop notifications and more.
While optional, a fair few games have begun depending on it and therefore they end up not releasing Linux versions on GOG. A problem that has increased recently with a few titles.
All discussion on it, can be found in this post on the GOG forum. I would link to stuff directly, but it appears their links to specific posts don't actually do anything.
Here's one that caught my attention when sent it earlier:
They continued in another post:
And another:
It's a real shame for those who don't like Steam for various reasons and prefer GOG, this is a bit of a let down really. Especially considering this is the first solid reply we've had since Galaxy was announced in 2014. It feels like we've been waiting all this time for something, when it wasn't even being planned for yet. If you go to the official GOG Galaxy page and you're quick enough, it will flash text below the download button which includes "and soon for Linux".
Personally, I really hope more developers put their games on itch.io. They offer a good service, their site is nice, their open source client is also pretty slick. Not saying GOG are bad or evil (I'm very fond of GOG's work to bring classics back to life with DOSBox), but it's good to have alternatives.
It should go without saying, but when speaking to developers, it pays to remain as polite as possible. Also remember, this person likely isn't the one making the decisions on this. Don't shoot the messenger. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
For those that don't know, GOG now have their own Steam-like client called Galaxy. It offers things like Cloud Saves, an in-game overlay, bandwidth limiting, capturing screenshots, desktop notifications and more.
While optional, a fair few games have begun depending on it and therefore they end up not releasing Linux versions on GOG. A problem that has increased recently with a few titles.
All discussion on it, can be found in this post on the GOG forum. I would link to stuff directly, but it appears their links to specific posts don't actually do anything.
Here's one that caught my attention when sent it earlier:
QuoteWe're not posting any news, as we have no news on GOG Galaxy for Linux. As we stated before we'll eventually bring it to Linux, but currently it's not a priority for us, and we don't have any estimated date to share at this moment.
They continued in another post:
QuoteI'm not saying we're not able to, or we don't know how. But building and maintaining a Linux build will cost us resources, which as in every company are limited. Currently we're not able to spend the time required considering our internal roadmap.
And another:
QuoteGOG Galaxy was made with cross platform compatibility in mind, but each platform is a constant cost (dev, qa) . With our roadmap we don't currently have the resources to maintain the Linux version.
It's a real shame for those who don't like Steam for various reasons and prefer GOG, this is a bit of a let down really. Especially considering this is the first solid reply we've had since Galaxy was announced in 2014. It feels like we've been waiting all this time for something, when it wasn't even being planned for yet. If you go to the official GOG Galaxy page and you're quick enough, it will flash text below the download button which includes "and soon for Linux".
Personally, I really hope more developers put their games on itch.io. They offer a good service, their site is nice, their open source client is also pretty slick. Not saying GOG are bad or evil (I'm very fond of GOG's work to bring classics back to life with DOSBox), but it's good to have alternatives.
It should go without saying, but when speaking to developers, it pays to remain as polite as possible. Also remember, this person likely isn't the one making the decisions on this. Don't shoot the messenger. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
Quoting: TheRiddickLike I said they are HOSTILE towards Linux, don't know when that will change.
This "If you are not my friend, then you are my enemy" attitude usually serves no one. Why is it so difficult to just accept and respect that different people value different things in life? Really, this is no declaration of war from them. They just decided (most likely after a lot and long of internal discussion as it happens with strategic decisions in companies) that their business is elsewhere. That's all.
Last edited by jens on 21 August 2017 at 7:31 pm UTC
0 Likes
Quoting: jensQuoting: TheRiddickLike I said they are HOSTILE towards Linux, don't know when that will change.
This "If you are not my friend, then you are my enemy" attitude usually serves no one. Why is it so difficult to just accept and respect that different people value different things in life? Really, this is no declaration of war from them. They just decided (most likely after a lot and long of internal discussion as it happens with strategic decisions in companies) that their business is elsewhere. That's all.
Why it's so difficult to understand:
They lie:
*Galaxy is coming soon (soon is subjective but if there's no work, no plans no roadmap then it's a lie)
*Galaxy is in progress (it was in progress for years yet they didn't do anything)
*Witcher 3 - coming soon banner on Steam *twice. (Sure it was valve, but it someone tells a lie involving me and my customers, i'm not going to stay silent, especially if they do it again)
I consider lying to your customers hostile (maybe it wasn't always a lie, maybe an exageration, but at one point it became a lie and they ignored the questions and mantained silence, at the very least they could have removed the "soon" and "in progress")
Valve may not care at all about Linux, it might be their plan b, they're a business and they want to make money. Also Linux is not their priority. But GOG is a business too they're not heroes, DRM FREE is not an ideology, it's their motto, their niche. if they were driven by ideals Linux would be special for them, their customers would be their friends and they would be very open and communicative with them.
tl;dr GOG is not a crusader and Valve is not the devil, both are businesses
3 Likes, Who?
Quoting: Marianotl;dr GOG is not a crusader and Valve is not the devil, both are businesses
Exactly ;)
I agree (based on what I read here, haven't followed myself) their communication could have been better. But being "hostile" is something entirely different.
Last edited by jens on 21 August 2017 at 9:18 pm UTC
1 Likes, Who?
Quoting: jensQuoting: Marianotl;dr GOG is not a crusader and Valve is not the devil, both are businesses
Exactly ;)
I agree (based on what I read here, haven't followed myself) their communication could have been better. But being "hostile" is something entirely different.
Yes it's true hostile could sound too harsh, a better word could be used, i would have chosen disrespectful (lying and ignoring the questions after it was obvious that neither Galaxy or Witcher 3 were being worked) certainly is.
And while not hostile i wouldn't say they are friendly either:
yes they sell Linux games and it's not keys so they have to host the files and modify their website (but if they didn't do that they would be selling a less complete game than other stores)
They offer Linux versions of DosBox and ScummVM games, again just a installer and data files would be enough here.
The only thing that i recognize that they've done for Linux was when they compiled AGS and made Linux available when the developer didn't. (That truly was something great they did for Linux and i don't recall anyone mentioning it in these threads) but it was a few games and then it stopped.
Plus Galaxy and Witcher 3 (no explanation needed)
1 Likes, Who?
appetrosyan Aug 22, 2017
Quoting: LeopardWell , it was a very well known truth.
Thus , i won't buy a single title from GOG.
I don't want to be hostile to GOG but i don't care a platform which don't care a bit about Linux.
They don't have it as a priority because of CDPR's recent backlash for TW2's performance. They don't care about linux, because Linux had a chance to care about them and blew it.
0 Likes
Quoting: appetrosyanThey don't have it as a priority because of CDPR's recent backlash for TW2's performance. They don't care about linux, because Linux had a chance to care about them and blew it.
Let's drop this "TW2 performance" topic already. It has nothing to do with anything that's going on today.
1 Likes, Who?
...why is it that everytime i read comments here, feels like you guys are saying that GOG cancelled making a Linux version despite the fact that it is stated that it's "not a priority".
In fact IMO, deciding not to buy any game from em is pretty much the worst idea you can possible make in this current situation.
In fact IMO, deciding not to buy any game from em is pretty much the worst idea you can possible make in this current situation.
2 Likes, Who?
Quoting: KayKay91...why is it that everytime i read comments here, feels like you guys are saying that GOG cancelled making a Linux version despite the fact that it is stated that it's "not a priority"."Not a priority" practically means it's in limbo indefinitely, which is about as good as cancelled until they come up with a schedule that specifies when it's due to come out.
In fact IMO, deciding not to buy any game from em is pretty much the worst idea you can possible make in this current situation.
And regarding buying games from them, why should we? Some of us are really not interested in the hassle that comes with buying games without access to a client that handles updates for them and I for one am not going to keep buying games from them to "encourage" them to port the client over. That's almost like buying Windows copies of games to run in Wine to show that Linux users have an interest in them, ultimately my answer as GOG would be "Oh, they don't care that we don't have the client for them? Well, that means we can drop it down on the priorities even further!".
0 Likes
Quoting: KayKay91...why is it that everytime i read comments here, feels like you guys are saying that GOG cancelled making a Linux version despite the fact that it is stated that it's "not a priority".
In fact IMO, deciding not to buy any game from em is pretty much the worst idea you can possible make in this current situation.
After some years we will have to stop thinking of this as delayed. How many more years you want us to wait before it is released? 5, 10, 15? On this day and age those who can't make something on a reasonable speed will be left behind. Even more the competition has already stepped up to the task long ago.
As it is right now, GOG has an inferior product and the only advantage they have is the DRM Free approach and that for lots of people is secondary in comparison to the usability of a client.
0 Likes
Quoting: bgh251f2After some years we will have to stop thinking of this as delayed. How many more years you want us to wait before it is released? 5, 10, 15? On this day and age those who can't make something on a reasonable speed will be left behind. Even more the competition has already stepped up to the task long ago.
As it is right now, GOG has an inferior product and the only advantage they have is the DRM Free approach and that for lots of people is secondary in comparison to the usability of a client.
The main reason I could think of is that GOG is still a smaller store. I mean you have to live in Warsaw in order to work there, afaik there's like 2 ppl who use Linux (Judas i believe is one of em) and they are still looking for workers.
0 Likes
Patreon
PayPal
See more from me