Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

The Early Access sandbox game Planet Nomads [Official Site] has officially dropped plans to include any kind of co-op or multiplayer.

A massive shame, as these sandbox games really do end up boring by yourself. Unless they make the game somehow incredibly good, this move may not go down well with their Kickstarter backers and Early Access buyers. In fact, negative reviews for this are already starting to appear.

They wrote in a post on their official site, which does give some valid reasons. The part that bothers me here is that they did promise it, seemingly without thinking on how difficult it would be. I mean, did they really think implementing proper multiplayer wouldn't be difficult? Here's what they said:

It's about time we stopped contemplating and constantly discussing whether or not to start adding multiplayer. A decision had to be made and has been made. Planet Nomads is not going to have multiplayer or CO-OP game modes. Our focus is going to be 100% dedicated to making an immersive singleplayer sandbox game that's both giving a huge amount of creative freedom and plenty of things to explore and discover, as well as a sense of direction towards a higher goal. We apologize to our Kickstarter backers and preorder Nomads who backed Planet Nomads purely for the multiplayer aspect of it. Here's a more detailed explanation for our decision.

In the more detailed link, it really just reads like like they're saying "It's more work than we planned for.". It might sound like I'm being particularly harsh, but that is basically the reality of what they're saying.

They haven't posted about this on Steam directly yet, I imagine as it would cause an even bigger backlash due to more people seeing it and taking note of it.

I'm not writing the game off completely, since it could end up being a good game. However, now it won't have any multiplayer at all, it's essentially become "yet another survival game" that's in Early Access. Their roadmap doesn't particularly sound all that great either. Planet customization, optimizations, quests (very difficult to make quests actually fun) and monuments.

Still, since they can fully focus on the game being singleplayer only, they might surprise us with having more breathing room to make it a great experience. Last thing we need is another ARK.

Thanks to Marcelo in our Telegram Group for the tip!

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
5 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
44 comments
Page: «2/5»
  Go to:

TheRiddick Sep 3, 2017
This type of game desperately needs Multiplayer sadly otherwise its becomes far too hard and grindey and lonely. So unless their going to ad in some sort of AMAZING single player campaign that is going to captivate us (unlikely) then this game will suffer in the popularity area.

Perhaps further down the line they will revisit the idea, THAT would be a acceptable response, but saying no MP never it dead bye bye is not good.
scaine Sep 3, 2017
View PC info
  • Contributing Editor
  • Mega Supporter
I'm pretty gutted about this. I was assuming it was multiplayer and looking forward to buying a four pack for my son's and I. I can't get excited by this title now. I realise that Planet Nomads (Nomad now, I suppose?) Is shaping up to be a better title than Skybreak, but that's a good example of how empty and lonely a survival title is when it's just you.
bubexel Sep 3, 2017
A multiplayer is something have to be build from the base of game, implement it after game is finish is a bit crazy. If it was stretch goal at kickstarted it sounds a bit bad idea. Same happened to no man's sky. It's possible to make multiplayer but be ready to play a very unsyncronitzed game xD
TheRiddick Sep 3, 2017
If their using Unity3D Engine then it should be possible to ad in MP components later on since it supports it in engine. But only time will tell.
lucifertdark Sep 3, 2017
Quoting: GNUzelSo... No Man's Sky, but for Linux?
You say that like it's a bad thing. I for one want a No Man's Sky type game for Linux & if Planet Nomads is that game then I'll be happy to play it without the multiplayer or coop.
Marc Di Luzio Sep 3, 2017
  • Game Dev
  • Supporter Plus
Worth noting Subnautica has been successful with this model, though I get the impression they may still add MP some time in the future.


Last edited by Marc Di Luzio on 3 September 2017 at 8:33 pm UTC
Areso Sep 3, 2017
Quoting: TheSHEEEPA survival game completely without co-op?
Weird. To say the least.

But to promise multiplayer as a stretch goal is just completely beyond amateurish.
Every developer worth his money knows that multiplayer is a framework decision, not something you can just "add" later on.
Doesn't exactly inspire confidence in the developer in this case.
Don't Starve. A survival game completely without co-op.

Don't Starve. Single player game, where multiplayer was "added" sometime later. (As well as Goat Simulator).
Though I agree, MP is something very fundamental. It is should be supported by game's architecture.


Last edited by Areso on 3 September 2017 at 3:57 pm UTC
TheSHEEEP Sep 3, 2017
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: Areso
Quoting: TheSHEEEPA survival game completely without co-op?
Weird. To say the least.

But to promise multiplayer as a stretch goal is just completely beyond amateurish.
Every developer worth his money knows that multiplayer is a framework decision, not something you can just "add" later on.
Doesn't exactly inspire confidence in the developer in this case.
Don't Starve. A survival game completely without co-op.
Yeah, and quite boring after a few hours (at least for most players which is why Don't Starve Together has like 4-5x the player count).

Quoting: AresoDon't Starve. Single player game, where multiplayer was "added" sometime later. (As well as Goat Simulator).
Well, Don't Starve Together is a standalone game, and most likely because they weren't able to do it via a simple patch (or DLC).
And Goat Simulator... come on. That game is so simplistic, they probably really only needed to install the networking plugin and a bit of code around it ;)
14 Sep 3, 2017
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
*Removes from Steam watch list*
Shmerl Sep 3, 2017
Personally, I don't mind and think it's good they'll focus all their resources on single-player, but I can understand that some who were waiting for multiplayer specifically might get upset.


Last edited by Shmerl on 3 September 2017 at 7:41 pm UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.
Buy Games
Buy games with our affiliate / partner links: