Check out our Monthly Survey Page to see what our users are running.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Good news for all, as F1 2017 [Steam, Feral Store] for Linux will work on both NVIDIA and AMD graphics cards with Vulkan goodness.

If you blinked one too many times and managed to miss it, Feral Interactive confirmed previously that F1 2017 on Linux will use Vulkan. This made a few people think AMD support might be a bit iffy, but I'm glad to see Feral is once again supporting Mesa!

Minimum specs:

  • 3.3Ghz Intel Core i3-3225
  • Ubuntu 17.04
  • 4GB RAM
  • 2GB NVIDIA 680 or 3rd Generation AMD Graphics Core Next (Volcanic Islands) graphics card or better.

Recommended specs:

  • 3.5Ghz Intel Core i5-6600K
  • 8GB RAM
  • 8GB NVIDIA 1070 graphics card or better.

Intel graphics cards are not supported. NVIDIA graphics cards require drivers 384.90 or later. AMD graphics cards require Mesa drivers 17.2.2.

Find the official Feral news post here.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
9 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
40 comments
Page: «2/4»
  Go to:

lvlark Oct 31, 2017
Quoting: cRaZy-bisCuiTJust go for the appropriate ppa and you're good to go. Works like a Charme. Should I google the link for you as well? (;
Ooh that's a bit mean. I would understand if someone wants to run a LTS release and not add different PPA's. By way of "I'll install this and worry about system management/maintenance as little as possible".

Although that does mean situations like this pop up.
slaapliedje Oct 31, 2017
Quoting: scaineI wonder if Ubuntu 17.04 is a typo? Unusual to state a non-LTS release as a minimum spec, isn't it? Genuinely don't know, but I only run LTS releases on my gaming machine, so I guess I'll find out when I get this.

Why would you only use LTS releases for gaming machines? Gaming machines should be more bleeding edge than servers, which is really what LTS is for.

Quoting: gojulA bit scared about Vulkan, as Debian only features driver 375.82. Anyway bought the game from Feral Store as their other ports were awesome.


I actually run Debian Sid with the 'experimental' nvidia drivers at home on my desktop, and they work great. Even got SteamVR and Serious Sam VR working in it.

I think most people running Debian as a desktop should probably be running 'Testing' which is currently 'buster'. It's usually more stable than Ubuntu is. I don't know about anyone else, but Ubuntu tends to start having all these PPA repos installed, which add more to an already somewhat unstable mess. While it's based on Debian and they've made some choices to make it a bit more user friendly, in the end some of those choices and tweaks make it less stable, one for sure is that enable a lot of experimental drivers in their kernel.
mcphail Oct 31, 2017
Heh. I'll buy this, even if I'll just be watching an F1 sideshow montage on my terrible machine. Maybe one day I'll be able to run it in all its glory! Thanks for bringing it to Linux.
Mountain Man Nov 1, 2017
Surprisingly modest specs judging by the videos I've seen. My hardware is a few years old, but I could probably push this to high settings, assuming it's well-optimized.
GustyGhost Nov 1, 2017
Quoting: gojulA bit scared about Vulkan, as Debian only features driver 375.82. Anyway bought the game from Feral Store as their other ports were awesome.

384.9 appears to be on the way.
Just to agree with other posters here:

1) There is no way I will run anything but LTS releases. My machines are production tools, not hobby toys. I am too old and busy now to screw around with re-installing my OS every 6 months. Been there, done that.

2) There is no way I will ever install drivers from anything but a semi-official PPA. It is great that the Ubuntu graphics-drivers ppa exists. I have used the Nvidia web download in the past; See above comment about life being short. My spare time is for playing games, not periodically rescuing my operating system.

All that said, I am patient so I will just wait until the next LTS comes out and the PPA drivers catch up. By then there will be a steam sale. Not sure that is what Feral would want, though? People waiting isn't good for business.

Edit: Just to note, the graphics driver ppa does seem to be at 384.90 so it meets the specs. I was just responding to the casual suggestion to use the NVidia website.


Last edited by no_information_here on 1 November 2017 at 4:43 am UTC
0aTT Nov 1, 2017
Quoting: aejsmithI installed the NVIDIA driver using their installer earlier today on Ubuntu and it worked fine? Disable the PPA driver first, blacklist nouveau, and then run the NVIDIA installer.

Why not using:
https://launchpad.net/~graphics-drivers/+archive/ubuntu/ppa

???

Serious question.

In my understanding, all I need is the 384.90 driver. I can get it through the PPA.

Which driver does Ubuntu 17.10 currently use?


Last edited by 0aTT on 1 November 2017 at 7:58 am UTC
Eike Nov 1, 2017
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: scaine
Quoting: aejsmithI would strongly recommend installing newer drivers (384.90), using NVIDIA's own installer if necessary. We have known issues on older drivers.

You've got to be joking, right? Installing drivers... from a website? Not having to deal with that, ever, is one of Linux's greatest joys.

I share this view, and in your situation, I wouls install driver 384.90.2 from Debian experimental.


Last edited by Eike on 1 November 2017 at 12:36 pm UTC
slaapliedje Nov 1, 2017
Quoting: Eike
Quote
Quoting: scaineI would strongly recommend installing newer drivers (384.90), using NVIDIA's own installer if necessary. We have known issues on older drivers.

You've got to be joking, right? Installing drivers... from a website? Not having to deal with that, ever, is one of Linux's greatest joys.

I share this view, and in your situation, I wouls install driver 384.90.2 from Debian experimental.

That's what I do. I rarely have to fight with bugs, though I've found a few in Gnome 3.26. I almost have to record a video of how odd it is.

So at home, I have three monitors. An old 1600x1200 Dell 2001FP (I use this for retro systems, but it mostly is connected via DVI to my main system when I'm not using any of the retro systems), and two Dell s2716dg which are pretty glorious. In the new gnome display settings dialog, I can move these around and align them correctly. Then we move to my laptop...

At work I had a 2560x1440 and 1920x1080 monitors, plus the 3840x2160 laptop screen. I usually disable this because the scaling is crazy small. But for some reason the display dialog is locked, I can't move any of the screens around to align things. the 1920x1080 doesn't have an adjustable stand, so I couldn't raise it up to the top where it was locked in Gnome. arandr to the rescue, right? Well, the funny thing is even if the laptop panel is disabled but open, it works, and I can adjust it. If it's closed, I can't. It was completely re-producible. No idea why it acts this way. I ended up replacing the 1920x1080 monitor with a 3840x2160 monitor (27" being much more readable than a 15" at that resolution) and it looks amazing, but still has that weird locking issue, except now I'm trying to align the 27" monitor to the middle.

Problem is, I think randr doesn't support monitor SIZE rather than resolution. Realistically there should be a nice way to tell it "I have two 27" screens at separate resolutions, please scale monitor 1 to bar, and 2 to foo. The scale buttons on the gnome-shell dialog also seem to do nothing.

Maybe randr does have that option, and I just need to find it.

Anyhow, maybe I proved my point why some may want to use LTS. Though to be honest, I think Arch Linux is probably as stable as any LTS and you get rolling updates. There definitely is the occasional breakage, but I've seen LTS releases blow up from a simple kernel update.
gojul Nov 1, 2017
Quoting: Eike
Quote
Quoting: scaineI would strongly recommend installing newer drivers (384.90), using NVIDIA's own installer if necessary. We have known issues on older drivers.

You've got to be joking, right? Installing drivers... from a website? Not having to deal with that, ever, is one of Linux's greatest joys.

I share this view, and in your situation, I wouls install driver 384.90.2 from Debian experimental.

Okay if I have any issue I install the drivers from experimental.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.