Campo Santo, developer of Firewatch has joined Valve

Sigh, I get what you mean, you need the client to install or restore and Valve don't have an official position on what they will do if they close (although I remember they said there would be a way for steam users to play their games if that ever happened)
Then again you assume they are just evil and will make sure their users lose all their games, which would make no sense, GabeN would become the most hated person on the planet :D

I really don't get all the fuss about the dependency to Steam authentication. When I purchase a game I do this with the purpose of playing the game on my preferred (and only) gaming device. Steam on Linux allows me to do this without any of the heavy DRM stuff the poor Windows people have to deal with (I would not accept that too). No requirement to install something as root or whatsoever. Combined with convenience Steam offers (e.g. auto update, just one party for money transfer, etc.) and the willingness of Valve to invest some resources in Linux the perfect match for me.

I should add that I'm not a collector. I rarely watch a movie twice or read a book twice. Same with games, I think I have never finished a game more than once. May be that is the reason why I can easily accept the risk that there is a very minimal chance that my game library ends up empty when Valve closes their doors. That said I don't think that this will happen in my life time. I think chances are much much higher that sooner than this my games wont start anymore* due to the game having a dependency to some outdated library that is no longer there. Having a game on your external hd wont't help you in this case either ;).

Steam has I guess indeed some limited legal and technical control over my purchased games. But hey, these are only games, not over something personal like my job, kids, personal photo archive, whatever. I can certainly live with the restrictions. And furthermore, if Steam authentication makes publishers and developers think that their have some control (and I sympathize with their wishes for control) regardless or not if this has any practical effect, then I'm happily willing to accept this in its current form and help them with this feeling to get more and more big games to Linux land.

Anyway, to each his own, I prefer to play my games now and easily move on, than to archive them till the end of time.

* without considerable effort

Edit: typos.


Last edited by jens on 23 April 2018 at 6:30 pm UTC

Quoting: ShmerlAnd if it's incorrect, why does the official backup tool make it impossible to restore it back without the client?

Because you could give the game to a user that hasn't paid for the game.


Last edited by BOYSSSSS on 23 April 2018 at 6:28 pm UTC

Quoting: BOYSSSSSThen again you assume they are just evil and will make sure their users lose all their games, which would make no sense, GabeN would become the most hated person on the planet :D

No, I don't assume anything. I'm working with current facts. There is TOS (legal document), and there is their client. All hypothetical "what would happen if" can be based on that, not on what they didn't say.

And DRM free means, that you now can make a backup, and legally install it later, even if the store closes down. That you can establish now, explicitly.

Quoting: BOYSSSSS

Quoting: ShmerlAnd if it's incorrect, why does the official backup tool make it impossible to restore it back without the client?

Because you could give the game to a user that hasn't paid for the game.

Which implies DRM logic, bingo! Now you are starting to get the point.


Last edited by Shmerl on 23 April 2018 at 7:32 pm UTC

So, Half Life 3 will be set in a a vast, eerie, solitary laboratory complex with Alyx on a radio? Sounds good.

Quoting: ShmerlWhich implies DRM logic, bingo! Now you are starting to get the point.

So you consider DRM the ability to prevent a Steam user from giving a game to another Steam user? You have Steam Family Sharing for that. This Steam backup tool needs to be able to backup DRM-Free AND DRM games so theres no surprise there being some obstacle, although I don't see what the point of it is, you can just copy and archive your Games.
I consider a game DRM-Free, if I can copy the game to another PC and play it without the Steam Client and Internet connection.
Obviously that's not enough for you.

Quoting: BOYSSSSS

Quoting: ShmerlWhich implies DRM logic, bingo! Now you are starting to get the point.

So you consider DRM the ability to prevent a Steam user from giving a game to another Steam user?

I was talking about the intent of the DRM, not about the user. Trying to "prevent copying" is preemptive policing that DRM attempts to achieve. It doesn't care whether user wants to copy it for personal backup (which should be perfectly fine). DRM can't distinguish the purpose of copying. I.e. it uses presumption of guilt by default, that's exactly why DRM is overreaching and unethical.


Last edited by Shmerl on 23 April 2018 at 8:58 pm UTC

Quoting: Shmerl

Quoting: BOYSSSSS

Quoting: ShmerlWhich implies DRM logic, bingo! Now you are starting to get the point.

So you consider DRM the ability to prevent a Steam user from giving a game to another Steam user?

I was talking about the intent of the DRM, not about the user. Trying to "prevent copying" is preemptive policing that DRM attempts to achieve. It doesn't care whether user wants to copy it for personal backup (which should be perfectly fine). DRM can't distinguish the purpose of copying. I.e. it uses presumption of guilt by default, that's exactly why DRM is overreaching and unethical.

Again you answer one of my points and ignore the others. Would you agree that Steam Backup Tool is used for games that are supposed to have DRM and that the reason there is an obstacle put in Steam Backup Tool is extra protection for those games that do have DRM?
Do you acknowledge that there are DRM-Free games from Steam that you can just copy to another computer without Steam and play them?

Quoting: BOYSSSSSAgain you answer one of my points and ignore the others. Would you agree that Steam Backup Tool is used for games that are supposed to have DRM and that the reason there is an obstacle put in Steam Backup Tool is extra protection for those games that do have DRM?

Steam backup is the tool Steam authorize you to use to backup / restore. Manual method is not allowed according to Steam TOS. So Steam doesn't care whether games use some internal DRM or not, Steam itself is DRM in this case. This is quite clear, I'm not sure what needs more clarification in this case.

Quoting: BOYSSSSSDo you acknowledge that there are DRM-Free games from Steam that you can just copy to another computer without Steam and play them?

I don't acknowledge that you can legally do it. Steam TOS forbids it.

Quoting: UltraAltesBrot

Quoting: Doc Angelo

Quoting: MaelraneSteam itself is DRM.

Albeit it's the only one I accept and can live with, it is, per definition, DRM.

I don't think so. But maybe we have different definitions of what DRM means.

The Steam client is the very same as GOG Galaxy or the GOG website. You can buy and download games. Valve has their own DRM implementation (part of Steamworks), but it's completely optional. As a developer or publisher, you don't have to use the DRM tools provided by Steam, or your own DRM. You can just not use any DRM and still have your game on Steam.

http://steam.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_DRM-free_games

Don't even try to argue with fanatics, it won't lead anywhere.

The one who behaves like a fanatic here is you. You cant stand on your argument, so you have to call someone else a fanatic.
I can see some DRM-FREE fanatics here, to the point that they don't buy LINUX games because they are only on Steam, ridiculous.