Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Feral Interactive have teamed up with Crystal Dynamics and Square Enix once again to bring a top title to Linux, this time we have Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Disclosure: My key was provided by Feral Interactive ahead of release.

It’s no secret that the Linux port of the previous Tomb Raider had some performance problems, some of which were improved with a patch after release. I’m pleased to say that with Rise of the Tomb Raider, Feral Interactive have done an incredible job overall.

Even though the Linux release is coming in a good while after the Windows release, we do get the 20 Year Celebration edition which includes all the DLC. So we have the complete edition right away along with all the polish that was put into it since release.

Benchmarks

First up, let's see how well it runs with the settings on the absolute maximum, with the different AA options that are possible. Do note, that the game itself warns you that SSAA is very heavy and will reduce performance a lot. Also, Pure Hair is turned on by default for all options above the Low preset. The different presets, even the highest preset actually leaves a few options lower than the maximum, so I manually put them up for these tests. Another note about this: the Very High textures option in use for these first tests, does require a GPU on Linux to have 6GB VRAM (I've seen it practically hit the limit):

As you can see, FXAA and SMAA actually give quite reasonable performance, especially considering all other settings are cranked up to their absolute highest. Even SSAA x2 didn't do too badly with it hitting just over 60FPS average overall. To be clear though, the above results and settings are something very few people will be able to use.

Here's some additional benchmarks for settings people are actually likely to use, from the Very High preset to the Lowest, all with FXAA turned on apart from Lowest which I manually turned off (trying to simulate what people might do):


Note: In the Linux version, the Very High preset leaves textures on High, whereas on Windows it sets it to Very High.

As a bonus, here's a comparison with Windows 10. Do note, that the Windows version has two additional modes of Ambient Occlusion not included in the Linux build, so these tests are simply done with it set to "On" in both versions to compare properly. Also, to keep it to the point we're only using the "Overall Score" given here:

As expected, there's a performance gap, although it's actually less than I expected. Given that these are some insanely high settings with everything manually put up higher than the presets go, the Linux version holds up reasonably well overall. Especially considering the high VRAM use in the Linux version with my 6GB 980ti at it's limits.

Here's how the Linux version holds up on more reasonable graphical settings:

Not bad, not bad at all.

Thoughts

We could run benchmarks until we're red in the face, however, what the benchmarks actually show is quite limited of course and is nothing in comparison to a first-hand playthrough. I started off playing it on the "High" preset, but honestly, I set it to "Very High" quite quickly since it was so damn smooth and it remained smooth even then. I did keep textures down to the default of High, due to the VRAM use. I have to say, I'm personally extremely happy about how smoothly Rise of the Tomb Raider has been running on Linux.

If you thought the first Tomb Raider was action-packed, you’re in for a whole new world of crazy here. Rise of the Tomb Raider certainly isn’t gentle with thrusting you into daunting situations right off the bat. It's also quite the emotional roller-coaster of a game, one that at times blurs the lines between game and movie in the way it's presented.

Not only are you thrown in at the deep end with Rise, you’re also shown how incredibly good-looking this game is right away. Seriously, it's easily one of the best looking games available on Linux right now, some truly gorgeous scenes can be found throughout the game. I've found myself often just stopping to have a look around.

Those pictures are on the standard “High” preset with no other adjustments, yet it looks absolutely gorgeous. It's not just the graphical fidelity, but the actual style to the game is fantastic too, all the little details have made me really appreciate it.

In the first game, Lara was forced into survival against her will. Things are a bit different this time around, as Lara has gained confidence and a sense of self and is literally seeking out the danger of her own free will. You’re on the hunt for some sort of artifact to grant eternal life, Lara is sure it exists and decides to follow her father’s path. Not the most original of story basics, but it’s exciting to actually play through given what Crystal Dynamics have done with it.

The voice actor for Lara, Camilla Luddington, reprises her role for Rise of the Tomb Raider and does just as incredible a job as before. She's really believable, you really feel the intensity of everything thanks to her excellent work here.

While Rise has ample amounts of serious action, requiring some fine aim and reflexes, there's also a healthy dose of puzzles and challenges to overcome as well. As you progress, you will find certain relics that requires Lara to have a certain level of understanding in specific languages.

This makes the exploration side of it a little more fun and varied too and at times, this will give you a reason to fast-travel back to another area, once you learn enough to translate something previously left behind. This brings me to another point, there's so many camps spread across the quite large map, that actually switching between locations is incredibly easy.

Great, but what about actual Tombs to raid? Well there's optional tombs in there too, like the first one you find which is essentially a huge wooden ship buried in the ice:

While they're optional, they're certainly worth doing for the extras that they give you.

To me, it feels like they took all the good bits from the first game and expanded upon them giving you more options everywhere. There's more skills to learn for example, with the previous game having around 24 split across three classes, with Rise given you a whopping 50 skills! It's not just that there's more of them, they're much more interesting to actually unlock too. Some quite menacing in fact, like the ability to put a trap on an enemy corpse.

In addition to all the exploration, the scavenging, translating, region challenges and tomb raiding there's also completely optional missions you can do. Given out by various people you can find spread throughout the game. It's quite a nice way to take a break from the main story, while still giving you some extras to help you along your way, it makes the game a lot more varied that's for sure.

I think one of the great things about Rise of the Tomb Raider, is that it gives that open-world feeling with you being able to travel between areas and do things you miss, while not being overwhelming. It's a good mix of styles bundled together, to allow you to really push through when you want to, and take a break doing some of the smaller (but still fun) aspects of the game whenever you want.

There's a lot I haven't touched on here, partly because I don't want to spoil literally everything and also because it's such a big and varied game, if you spend a little time with it and don't rush through. Sometimes it's the little things, like talking to a character and a rabbit suddenly hops into view, looks right at the screen and then hops away…

As a reminder, to get the most performance out of the Linux version, you will likely want your CPU in Performance mode. You can do this using Feral's GameMode tool, by using this GNOME Shell extension or by doing it manually in terminal:

echo performance | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor

Replace "performance" with whatever mode you wish to revert it back

The Final Verdict

I haven’t been this engrossed in a game since—well—ever? I’m not being hyperbolic here either, it has such a fantastic mix of gameplay elements all wrapped up in lush detailed graphics. From the moment I first loaded it I just couldn’t put it down. Feral did a really sweet job on the port as well.

I don't want to get ahead of myself here, but given what a great job they did, this gives me high hopes for Shadow of the Tomb Raider (the next title) to be on Linux and run well.

You can find Rise of the Tomb Raider on Humble StoreFeral Store and Steam. Fantastic to have another AAA title on Linux.

We will have a livestream of it tonight and tomorrow with Sin taking the helm, keep an eye on our Twitch channel!

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
51 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
221 comments
Page: «8/23»
  Go to:

Ehvis Apr 19, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Just did a bit of initial testing and played a bit. Tried 3440x1440 on very high and performance is still quite reasonable. Averaged 35 fps on the benchmark, which combined with G-Sync is still smooth. May turn down the settings a bit later when I get to combat. All done without setting my cpu governor (seems to do little with P-State) and on 390.48 drivers.
knotted10 Apr 19, 2018
When I try to run it I got a Failed to create Vulkan device: -3

Anyone with the same issue?
I'm running Manjaro 17.1.8 with bumblebee and NVIDIA 390.48 driver
g000h Apr 19, 2018
Got my copy of Rise of the Tomb Raider. Installed it on Debian 9.x with stable Nvidia non-free drivers (approx 375.xx) and it didn't work. But, the Feral Launcher showed up and let me know that my hardware configuration was not suitable (well, the drivers anyway).

So, what did I do... Edited /etc/apt/sources.lst and changed my distribution from Debian 9 (stretch) to Debian 10 testing (buster). After all, this machine is my game playing rig, and I've still got a stable distribution on my other workstation.

The apt-get dist-upgrade didn't go completely well (grrr). But after a fair bit of fiddling I had working gnome3 and Nvidia driver 390.84 which as some people have reported is working for them.

One thing I did was to apt-get remove -purge nvidia* and then re-add the Nvidia bits again, e.g. apt-get install nvidia-driver nvidia-settings nvidia-smi
There was also dpkg --add-architecture i386 and other things to get it all working properly.

Good news. After getting Debian 10 up and running, Rise of the Tomb Raider worked for me too, although Feral's launcher is still reporting that the hardware is not suitable (e.g. Nvidia driver 390.48).

Working for me on 390.48, I put the various settings up to Very High and also set the Resolution to 3840x2160, and YES, it looks lovely and runs at a decent frame-rate. Played just over an hour so far.

Thumbs up to Feral for a good job. :)


Last edited by g000h on 19 April 2018 at 10:41 pm UTC
Shmerl Apr 19, 2018
Can anyone analyze the binary please. Is it using D3D11 → Vulkan translation, or D3D12 → Vulkan?
melkemind Apr 19, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: Mutant22Hello everybody.
I just registered today to share my experience with the game. For some reason the game is running better on linux than windows version (windows 7 DX11) :D . It is a relatively recent windows install (installed about a month ago) so it shouldn't be bloated much. I am playing at PC in my profile, dual booting with windows to test it. I have recent NVIDIA binary driver 396.18 and i tried to disable new spir-v compiler (if it does something, i don't know). And I set CPU governor to performance mode, too.

It looks as though it doesn't support Windows save data. Is that correct?
Ehvis Apr 19, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: Guest
Quoting: EhvisJust did a bit of initial testing and played a bit. Tried 3440x1440 on very high and performance is still quite reasonable. Averaged 35 fps on the benchmark, which combined with G-Sync is still smooth. May turn down the settings a bit later when I get to combat. All done without setting my cpu governor (seems to do little with P-State) and on 390.48 drivers.

Hmm, very interesting... G-Sync is supported by which GPU vendor ?

Also, from which kernel on is P-State enabled ?

Sorry for those noobs questions ! As for me, my eyes are so bad I wouldn't see a different over 1080p (except with a huge screen of course :)

G-Sync is Nvidia obviously. And P-State is used with every modern intel cpu I think.
Spud13y Apr 19, 2018
I might have to tweak the graphics settings a little, because I customized it a little beyond what they said was the highest. Went from 40 to 60 (being my cap). Performance seems fine enough. Got annoying pop-ups before I could get to the launcher telling me that I don't have their CPU tool, the Nvidia drivers they want, or an unsupported OS. I'm rather intrigued with the story, something akin to Indiana Jones (no duh) and Dan Brown books.
D34VA_ Apr 20, 2018
Only complaint so far is the inconsistent behavior of the dodge mechanic. There is a particular fight that REQUIRES it and I ended up rage-quitting from being killed repeatedly trying to successfully use the damned dodge. Taking a well-needed break.
Egonaut Apr 20, 2018
I agree, the quick time events are terrible and were already annoying in Tomb Raider (2013). I don't have a problem with them to solve after a few tries, but I still hate them. The dodging isn't that hard to me, I think you just need a little bit practise. Beside this the game is great, fun and looks gorgeous.

The performance for me is slightly slower compared to Windows, but still good. The main difference is, that I was able to run the game maxed out with SSAO 2x at stable 60FPS on Windows. On the Linux port the FPS are dropping below 60FPS with the same settings, which is a little bit sad, since there is a lot of flicker without SSAO everywhere (trees, bushes, etc.) and neither FXAA nor SMAA can fix that.

Later in the game there will be pretty big areas which are the most demanding places in the game, will be interesting to see how the port performance is there. But I'm many hours of playtime away of those areas :)


Last edited by Egonaut on 20 April 2018 at 1:06 am UTC
DanglingPointer Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: GuestI cannot launch the game on Manjaro with Mesa 18.0 (Radeon R9 280X). It says:

Vulkan device has no suitable present queue families.

What am I doing wrong?

Try these...
- Get linux mainline kernel 4.16.+ (not sure how that's done in Manjaro, I use Ukuu on Ubuntu)
- See if you have the MESA Vulkan drivers installed
- A new MESA stable update has just been released 18.0.1 (I use Padoka Stable on Ubuntu)
- Update your kernel command line if the above 3 don't work.
Mine's:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1 amdgpu.dc=1"

Good luck! It should work.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.
Buy Games
Buy games with our affiliate / partner links: