Confused on Steam Play and Proton? Be sure to check out our guide.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Feral Interactive have teamed up with Crystal Dynamics and Square Enix once again to bring a top title to Linux, this time we have Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Disclosure: My key was provided by Feral Interactive ahead of release.

It’s no secret that the Linux port of the previous Tomb Raider had some performance problems, some of which were improved with a patch after release. I’m pleased to say that with Rise of the Tomb Raider, Feral Interactive have done an incredible job overall.

Even though the Linux release is coming in a good while after the Windows release, we do get the 20 Year Celebration edition which includes all the DLC. So we have the complete edition right away along with all the polish that was put into it since release.

Benchmarks

First up, let's see how well it runs with the settings on the absolute maximum, with the different AA options that are possible. Do note, that the game itself warns you that SSAA is very heavy and will reduce performance a lot. Also, Pure Hair is turned on by default for all options above the Low preset. The different presets, even the highest preset actually leaves a few options lower than the maximum, so I manually put them up for these tests. Another note about this: the Very High textures option in use for these first tests, does require a GPU on Linux to have 6GB VRAM (I've seen it practically hit the limit):

As you can see, FXAA and SMAA actually give quite reasonable performance, especially considering all other settings are cranked up to their absolute highest. Even SSAA x2 didn't do too badly with it hitting just over 60FPS average overall. To be clear though, the above results and settings are something very few people will be able to use.

Here's some additional benchmarks for settings people are actually likely to use, from the Very High preset to the Lowest, all with FXAA turned on apart from Lowest which I manually turned off (trying to simulate what people might do):


Note: In the Linux version, the Very High preset leaves textures on High, whereas on Windows it sets it to Very High.

As a bonus, here's a comparison with Windows 10. Do note, that the Windows version has two additional modes of Ambient Occlusion not included in the Linux build, so these tests are simply done with it set to "On" in both versions to compare properly. Also, to keep it to the point we're only using the "Overall Score" given here:

As expected, there's a performance gap, although it's actually less than I expected. Given that these are some insanely high settings with everything manually put up higher than the presets go, the Linux version holds up reasonably well overall. Especially considering the high VRAM use in the Linux version with my 6GB 980ti at it's limits.

Here's how the Linux version holds up on more reasonable graphical settings:

Not bad, not bad at all.

Thoughts

We could run benchmarks until we're red in the face, however, what the benchmarks actually show is quite limited of course and is nothing in comparison to a first-hand playthrough. I started off playing it on the "High" preset, but honestly, I set it to "Very High" quite quickly since it was so damn smooth and it remained smooth even then. I did keep textures down to the default of High, due to the VRAM use. I have to say, I'm personally extremely happy about how smoothly Rise of the Tomb Raider has been running on Linux.

If you thought the first Tomb Raider was action-packed, you’re in for a whole new world of crazy here. Rise of the Tomb Raider certainly isn’t gentle with thrusting you into daunting situations right off the bat. It's also quite the emotional roller-coaster of a game, one that at times blurs the lines between game and movie in the way it's presented.

Not only are you thrown in at the deep end with Rise, you’re also shown how incredibly good-looking this game is right away. Seriously, it's easily one of the best looking games available on Linux right now, some truly gorgeous scenes can be found throughout the game. I've found myself often just stopping to have a look around.

Those pictures are on the standard “High” preset with no other adjustments, yet it looks absolutely gorgeous. It's not just the graphical fidelity, but the actual style to the game is fantastic too, all the little details have made me really appreciate it.

In the first game, Lara was forced into survival against her will. Things are a bit different this time around, as Lara has gained confidence and a sense of self and is literally seeking out the danger of her own free will. You’re on the hunt for some sort of artifact to grant eternal life, Lara is sure it exists and decides to follow her father’s path. Not the most original of story basics, but it’s exciting to actually play through given what Crystal Dynamics have done with it.

The voice actor for Lara, Camilla Luddington, reprises her role for Rise of the Tomb Raider and does just as incredible a job as before. She's really believable, you really feel the intensity of everything thanks to her excellent work here.

While Rise has ample amounts of serious action, requiring some fine aim and reflexes, there's also a healthy dose of puzzles and challenges to overcome as well. As you progress, you will find certain relics that requires Lara to have a certain level of understanding in specific languages.

This makes the exploration side of it a little more fun and varied too and at times, this will give you a reason to fast-travel back to another area, once you learn enough to translate something previously left behind. This brings me to another point, there's so many camps spread across the quite large map, that actually switching between locations is incredibly easy.

Great, but what about actual Tombs to raid? Well there's optional tombs in there too, like the first one you find which is essentially a huge wooden ship buried in the ice:

While they're optional, they're certainly worth doing for the extras that they give you.

To me, it feels like they took all the good bits from the first game and expanded upon them giving you more options everywhere. There's more skills to learn for example, with the previous game having around 24 split across three classes, with Rise given you a whopping 50 skills! It's not just that there's more of them, they're much more interesting to actually unlock too. Some quite menacing in fact, like the ability to put a trap on an enemy corpse.

In addition to all the exploration, the scavenging, translating, region challenges and tomb raiding there's also completely optional missions you can do. Given out by various people you can find spread throughout the game. It's quite a nice way to take a break from the main story, while still giving you some extras to help you along your way, it makes the game a lot more varied that's for sure.

I think one of the great things about Rise of the Tomb Raider, is that it gives that open-world feeling with you being able to travel between areas and do things you miss, while not being overwhelming. It's a good mix of styles bundled together, to allow you to really push through when you want to, and take a break doing some of the smaller (but still fun) aspects of the game whenever you want.

There's a lot I haven't touched on here, partly because I don't want to spoil literally everything and also because it's such a big and varied game, if you spend a little time with it and don't rush through. Sometimes it's the little things, like talking to a character and a rabbit suddenly hops into view, looks right at the screen and then hops away…

As a reminder, to get the most performance out of the Linux version, you will likely want your CPU in Performance mode. You can do this using Feral's GameMode tool, by using this GNOME Shell extension or by doing it manually in terminal:

echo performance | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor

Replace "performance" with whatever mode you wish to revert it back

The Final Verdict

I haven’t been this engrossed in a game since—well—ever? I’m not being hyperbolic here either, it has such a fantastic mix of gameplay elements all wrapped up in lush detailed graphics. From the moment I first loaded it I just couldn’t put it down. Feral did a really sweet job on the port as well.

I don't want to get ahead of myself here, but given what a great job they did, this gives me high hopes for Shadow of the Tomb Raider (the next title) to be on Linux and run well.

You can find Rise of the Tomb Raider on Humble StoreFeral Store and Steam. Fantastic to have another AAA title on Linux.

We will have a livestream of it tonight and tomorrow with Sin taking the helm, keep an eye on our Twitch channel!

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
51 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
221 comments
Page: «6/12»
  Go to:

KohlyKohl Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: Naib


cute... so what does it use to determine minimum system requirements?

Looking at the screenshot, it is just saying that your distribution is not supported.
DanglingPointer Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: Naib


cute... so what does it use to determine minimum system requirements?

You're fine mate, just that they tested against the distro they nominated as the minimum. Can you imagine the amount of distros that exists and all their different versions? There's no way they can QA all those permutations/combinations.

I'm on Ubuntu 16.04.4 with Linux 14.16.3 with Mesa 18.0 with a GCNv1.1 R9-290X and it is working perfectly, fluidly on Very High!


Last edited by DanglingPointer on 20 April 2018 at 2:10 pm UTC
nattydread Apr 20, 2018
Looks good, however I played this in 4k on the PS4 pro.

I wonder how the framerate holds up in 4k with an expensive gfx card?


Last edited by nattydread on 20 April 2018 at 2:46 pm UTC
g000h Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: nattydreadLooks good, however I played this in 4k on the PS4 pro.

I wonder how the framerate holds up in 4k with an expensive gfx card?

With GTX 1080 TI, I am playing on driver 390.84 with Very High Settings (and FXAA), and getting 66 fps average. GPU RAM usage appears to be about 6-7G of the 11G card. It could do with being a touch faster, but it is certainly decent.

And note - Practically nothing you run on PS4 or PS4 Pro is true 4K. It is upscaled 4K (from 1080p). The GPU in a PS4 Pro is not good enough for true 4K. Saying that, the upscaling is done very well.


Last edited by g000h on 20 April 2018 at 2:52 pm UTC
nattydread Apr 20, 2018
QuoteThe GPU in a PS4 Pro is not good enough for true 4K. Saying that, the upscaling is done very well.

Yes I know this and you are correct it is done very well. Especially for Horizon zero dawn.

66 fps sounds great. Thanks!
Naib Apr 20, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: KohlyKohl
Quoting: Naib


cute... so what does it use to determine minimum system requirements?

Looking at the screenshot, it is just saying that your distribution is not supported.
Quoting: DanglingPointer
Quoting: Naib


cute... so what does it use to determine minimum system requirements?

You're fine mate, just that they tested against the distro they nominated as the minimum. Can you imagine the amount of distros that exists and all their different versions? There's no way they can QA all those permutations/combinations.

I'm on Ubuntu 16.04.4 with Linux 14.16.3 with Mesa 18.0 with a GCNv1.1 R9-290X and it is working perfectly, fluidly on Very High!
Quoting: nattydreadLooks good, however I played this in 4k on the PS4 pro.

I wonder how the framerate holds up in 4k with an expensive gfx card?

Oh I know my sys would be fine, just wonder what they used to determine the system. I understand why they only provide support for Ubuntu and it sort of makes sense EVEN if the zen of linux is all distros are essentially the same, just different configurations/patch level ( I explain distro's to windows users as people only applying certain kb)

the game does QQ if even one core is not set to performance schedular (I have a CRONJOB that runs every minute to detect if a game is running and sets the governor accordingly... there was a bug and it missed one core...)


pgrep -f "SteamLibrary|HoN" && ( for c in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu{0..11}; do echo performance >$c/cpufreq/scaling_governor; done) || ( for c in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu{0..11}; do echo schedutil >$c/cpufreq/scaling_governor; done)


Runs VERY VERY smoothly :) my only complaint is a black screen via SteamLink but this might be due to resolution mismatch so ill look into that
tuubi Apr 20, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: Naib( I explain distro's to windows users as people only applying certain kb)
That sounds like a very inaccurate explanation. It implies the biggest difference is the amount of security you get.
Naib Apr 20, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: tuubi
Quoting: Naib( I explain distro's to windows users as people only applying certain kb)
That sounds like a very inaccurate explanation. It implies the biggest difference is the amount of security you get.
Lots of things are inaccurate... From a windows user perspective "there are thousands of distro's, what do people target"

There are hundreds of distro's but do you know what? at the core they are all the same. Once you reach the zen of Linux distributions you realise all they are are at different patchlevels compared to each other and different defaults.
Couple that with linux's extremely consistent api going backwards and well if you get something working for one you can get it working for another.

So if my "layman's" explanation to a windows user, in terminology they understand as to why it doesn't matter that there are hundreds of distros... WHAT do you suggest?
Purple Pudding Apr 20, 2018
When IAlwaysSin and Samsai stream the same game at the same time and you go "Why choose? I have two monitors, I watch both!"

]


Last edited by Purple Pudding on 20 April 2018 at 5:35 pm UTC
tuubi Apr 20, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: NaibSo if my "layman's" explanation to a windows user, in terminology they understand as to why it doesn't matter that there are hundreds of distros... WHAT do you suggest?
The right answer could be something like: "Don't worry about it. Give Ubuntu or maybe Mint a try as they're well supported by games and software, and look into the others when you've got a feel for it."
numasan Apr 20, 2018
I wanted this game no matter what, so if it would run badly, so be it. I'm positively surpriced to see it run so well so far on my system, from a purely subjective view. Love the graphics and animation. Lara looks so good and very realistic - no uncanny valley!

Thank you Feral Interactive, Crystal Dynamics and Square Enix!
urlauber Apr 20, 2018
Installed the latest Nvidia Beta drivers and put it on a SSD and it runs great on my GTX 960, high settings, 2560x1080! Tip to the hat, Feral, well done! And the game itself looks so beautiful!





Last edited by urlauber on 20 April 2018 at 8:11 pm UTC
numasan Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: Naib
Quoting: tuubi
Quoting: Naib( I explain distro's to windows users as people only applying certain kb)
That sounds like a very inaccurate explanation. It implies the biggest difference is the amount of security you get.
Lots of things are inaccurate... From a windows user perspective "there are thousands of distro's, what do people target"

There are hundreds of distro's but do you know what? at the core they are all the same. Once you reach the zen of Linux distributions you realise all they are are at different patchlevels compared to each other and different defaults.
Couple that with linux's extremely consistent api going backwards and well if you get something working for one you can get it working for another.

So if my "layman's" explanation to a windows user, in terminology they understand as to why it doesn't matter that there are hundreds of distros... WHAT do you suggest?
As always, the car analogy works here. Do you want a sports car, practical transportation or a bus? One look over another? I see Ubuntu as a cheap, and therefor very popular "car" (sorry, just my opinion)

I agree completely with you about "the zen of Linux distributions". I never understood the panic about fragmentation, when there are so many examples of (commercial) software that works perfectly across distros. Of course it makes sense from a support perspective to limit it to 1-2 distros, but ideally the choice of distro should be up to the individual user. Like trying different kinds of sports to see what fits your personality. In the meanwhile Ubuntu is fine as a "gateway drug" ;)
KuJo Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: DanglingPointer... with Linux 14.16.3 with Mesa ...
Back from the future?

Or I must have slept a hell of a long night last night when the kernel is already 10 major updates further than it was when I went to bed. ;):D
Leopard Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: numasan
Quoting: Naib
Quoting: tuubi
Quoting: Naib( I explain distro's to windows users as people only applying certain kb)
That sounds like a very inaccurate explanation. It implies the biggest difference is the amount of security you get.
Lots of things are inaccurate... From a windows user perspective "there are thousands of distro's, what do people target"

There are hundreds of distro's but do you know what? at the core they are all the same. Once you reach the zen of Linux distributions you realise all they are are at different patchlevels compared to each other and different defaults.
Couple that with linux's extremely consistent api going backwards and well if you get something working for one you can get it working for another.

So if my "layman's" explanation to a windows user, in terminology they understand as to why it doesn't matter that there are hundreds of distros... WHAT do you suggest?
As always, the car analogy works here. Do you want a sports car, practical transportation or a bus? One look over another? I see Ubuntu as a cheap, and therefor very popular "car" (sorry, just my opinion)

I agree completely with you about "the zen of Linux distributions". I never understood the panic about fragmentation, when there are so many examples of (commercial) software that works perfectly across distros. Of course it makes sense from a support perspective to limit it to 1-2 distros, but ideally the choice of distro should be up to the individual user. Like trying different kinds of sports to see what fits your personality. In the meanwhile Ubuntu is fine as a "gateway drug" ;)

They're all same at the core but why people see them so different is packaging differences.

.deb packages , .rpm's , ppa's , AUR etc.

That is not something that usual Windows users can grasp easily. They don't care for same kernel , same drivers etc. All they are looking for some kind of .exe .

Go ahead to Wine page for example , you will see the fragmentation on builds page.

That is why Flatpak ( rather than Snap or AppImages) is so important.
mahagr Apr 20, 2018
After quick testing with i-7700K / 16GB / GTX 1080 @ 4K / FXAA everything maxed out, the game runs around 40-45 FPS most of the time - minimum was slightly below 30 FPS and sometimes it was running even steady 60 FPS! I was using latest beta drivers in Ubuntu 17.10 after a reboot.

Well done Feral; but now I wish that my older Feral games ran as well... :) Both Tomb Raider 2013 and Deus Ex perform really badly compared to this one.
Leopard Apr 20, 2018
Quoting: mahagrAfter quick testing with i-7700K / 16GB / GTX 1080 @ 4K / FXAA everything maxed out, the game runs around 40-45 FPS most of the time - minimum was slightly below 30 FPS and sometimes it was running even steady 60 FPS! I was using latest beta drivers in Ubuntu 17.10 after a reboot.

Well done Feral; but now I wish that my older Feral games ran as well... :) Both Tomb Raider 2013 and Deus Ex perform really badly compared to this one.

They need Vulkan asap!
DanglingPointer Apr 21, 2018
Quoting: KuJo
Quoting: DanglingPointer... with Linux 14.16.3 with Mesa ...
Back from the future?

Or I must have slept a hell of a long night last night when the kernel is already 10 major updates further than it was when I went to bed. ;):D

LoL You should see what the kernel can run at 14! Runs everything up to quantum qbits in quantum computers!

Bugger... the Delorien is out of fuel...


Last edited by DanglingPointer on 21 April 2018 at 2:26 am UTC
D34VA_ Apr 21, 2018
Ah crap... Game keeps randomly freezing my system during loading screens. Most recent one forced me to reboot my PC twice...
ageres Apr 21, 2018
So far it performs excellent on my PC, ~70 fps in the start location and Syria. But I have some problems, probably because I have Nvidia driver 390, not recommended 396. When I install 396, after rebooting I see this:


I'll try to install it again next week after upgrading Ubuntu to 18.04.
With current driver I have glitches in the beginning of the game. There is so much snow blocking view I barely could play. There are some problems with lighting too:




Also the game freezed my system twice, when I tried to Alt+Tab and when I was just playing.
Anyway, it's nice to see this game on Linux.



Last edited by ageres on 28 April 2018 at 8:31 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.