Support us on Patreon
PayPalRecently, GOG added the Windows version of XCOM: Enemy Unknown to their store and since it has a Linux version on Steam, I reached out to the porter to see about their plans for the Linux version.
We've seen a lot of speculation in the past, with people wondering if Feral Interactive will ever get their Linux ports onto a store other than Steam. Here's their official stance, which they sent me this morning:
We don't have any plans to distribute our games through GoG. If this changes, we'll make announcements through our usual channels.
We can speculate all we like as to why they're not doing it, even if the decision does strike me as a little odd. Hopefully they will reevaluate this stance in future, considering it's not exactly a new game and the Linux port from 2014 isn't exactly new either.
A shame for everyone who prefers their games on GOG.
Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
Quoting: hummer010"user friendly" != "consumer friendly".
How do you define the difference?
0 Likes
Quoting: BeamboomQuoting: hummer010"user friendly" != "consumer friendly".
How do you define the difference?
Consumers can think that convenient violation of their rights is "friendly", as long as its convenient.
Last edited by Shmerl on 18 June 2018 at 4:08 pm UTC
2 Likes, Who?
Quoting: BeamboomQuoting: Adamfx990Its a shame publishers favour it despite GOG being the far-more consumer-friendly platform.
Oh well now - that totally depends on how you define "user friendly". One of my major arguments for Steam is precisely that it by far the most user friendly alternative, both in regards to the cloud storage of save-games (where that feature is utilised), the unified, cross platform chat feature with friends, and especially in regards to patching. It's all integrated in one client, one framework.
To claim this is not user-friendly is - if I am to be a bit blunt - really quite fanatic from the anti-drm camp. It is exactly what it is - very user friendly. That's the challenge GOG needs to tackle.
While I personally am only mildly annoyed by DRM, I think this post is doing an apples/oranges thing. Adamfx990 said "consumer-friendly", not "user-friendly". You then went and talked about "user-friendly". The terms are distinct. To go to absurd extremes--you could have a platform which featured a telepathic AI which read my mind and instantly downloaded for me any games which I had formed the clear intention to buy, and instantly started a game I wanted to play as soon as I had decided to play it (first cleanly shutting down any other programs I would have wanted to shut down, saving documents etc exactly how I would have done it) and generally responded to my every wish when it came to games--BUT the terms of use included a clause where the company gets to drain my bank account if I ever think of a unicorn. I put it to you that this would be very user-friendly, but not consumer-friendly. One might even argue that corporate AIs reading my mind is inherently not consumer-friendly.
DRM by its nature is not consumer-friendly . . . even if the platform running the DRM is user-friendly.
6 Likes, Who?
Quoting: GuestOr maybe they could put steam shim libraries in place (technical difficulty unknown), which GOG might disallow.Various developers have done it and so can Feral. GOG have no problem with it either. Anyway, whatever the excuse, Feral don't want to do it, and the end result is, their game is not available DRM-free. We don't argue about that, right? So in the end, it means Feral cater for DRMed stores only.
Last edited by Shmerl on 18 June 2018 at 4:34 pm UTC
4 Likes, Who?
I think there is no point in arguing what consumer friendly vs user friendly means, both terms can be used interchangeably. What this is about is convenience and user rights. DRM is user rights' hostile by definition. It also degrades some user experiences in different ways. But at the same time it might not affect other user experiences, which some might focus on as convenient. It doesn't mean it doesn't degrade the former. For instance, backup is an example of user experience. DRM is aimed to prevent it, therefore it's not user friendly in that sense.
Last edited by Shmerl on 18 June 2018 at 4:37 pm UTC
Last edited by Shmerl on 18 June 2018 at 4:37 pm UTC
2 Likes, Who?
Quoting: GuestBut while we can agree that this game is not on GOG for MacOS or GNU/Linux, the reasons are important if we'd like to see those reasons overcome and have games in a form we would prefer.
The reasons could be important, if Feral would have expressed them. But they refused. So it means they don't care about help in that matter either. For DRM-free users such attitude doesn't look friendly in the least, so it's natural to assume they only care to release in DRMed stores (which is exactly what they are already doing).
Last edited by Shmerl on 18 June 2018 at 4:49 pm UTC
2 Likes, Who?
Quoting: Alm888Eeehmm… Hello again! It seems you did not fully understand the whole meaning of the news. Well, just in case you missed (sorry for being Captain Obvious here), "XCOM: Enemy Unknown" is already available at GOG. DRM-free!Captain Obvious is my second-favorite superhero. The first one is Batman of course. :P
Yes, I know XCOM is on GOG. It is not published by Feral Interactive though. It is only one game. One exception does not make a rule.
Quoting: Alm888You cannot prove absence. Unless there is a reason to suspect that such terms exist (in which case we would have probably heard about them by now), it is logical to assume that this is not the case.Quoting: TheRiddickSteam does not stop developers releasing products on other platforms, so the decision is up to the original developer.Got any proof? Some Licence Agreement scans? Or, are you one of Valve employees and has explicit right to speak on behalf of Valve? And in this case the original developer had already decided do release the game DRM-free, but Feral is of different opinion on the matter.
Again, it is only one game. And for Feral to support a new platform for the sake of one game is costly. When more original publishers start releasing their games as DRM-free, I am sure that Linux versions will follow. But it is not Ferals decision to make.
2 Likes, Who?
Mblackwell Jun 18, 2018
Just because something is technically possible doesn't mean it is worth the potential time and money investment.
Last edited by Mblackwell on 18 June 2018 at 5:00 pm UTC
Last edited by Mblackwell on 18 June 2018 at 5:00 pm UTC
4 Likes, Who?
PublicNuisance Jun 18, 2018
Quoting: TheRiddickIf they released GOG Galaxy for Linux, then perhaps things might change a bit. We can only dream.
Do explain why Galaxy is needed for the release of Xcom.
Quoting: LinasWhy is everybody so up in arms about publishers not putting their games on GOG? Sure, DRM-free is important, but they are doing very little, if anything, to push Linux adoption. They have no Linux-compatible client (GOG Galaxy), no easy way to distribute updates, no standardized runtime, don't port their own games to Linux, nothing that would actually invite Linux users and developers.
GOG could become a great alternative to Steam if they actually cared about Linux, but until then Steam is much more Linux-friendly platform run by a much more Linux-friendly company.
1. The issue at hand here is not games not being released on GOG but that Windows versions of games are being released and not the Mac or Linux versions.
2. You say they won't port their own games to Linux but they did have Witcher 2 ported so the correct thing to have said was they don't port all of their games to Linux not that they don't port any at all
0 Likes
Quoting: BeamboomWould be interesting to read an explanation as to why. For all we know there might be good reasons. Yo Feral guy who hangs here, care to elaborate? :)
(not that it matters one bit for me personally, I want all my games in Steam anyways)
I would guess its down to the original contract feral have permission to port it to one platform ie steam and having gog version would reguire a different longer term licence.
0 Likes
See more from me