We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

In a move that's going to raise a lot of eyebrows, Microsoft has joined the Open Invention Network to 'protect Linux and other important open source workloads from patent assertions'.

For those who haven't heard of the OIN, their mission statement is quite a simple and honourable one "The Open Invention Network is a shared defensive patent pool with the mission to protect Linux.". To find out more about the OIN see here.

Hold the phone, this isn't gaming news?

Correct. However, this is still very interesting and extremely surprising from a company that has been pretty hostile to Linux in the past. It's the kind of move that could result in some big shifts in the entire industry.

We know Microsoft’s decision to join OIN may be viewed as surprising to some; it is no secret that there has been friction in the past between Microsoft and the open source community over the issue of patents. For others who have followed our evolution, we hope this announcement will be viewed as the next logical step for a company that is listening to customers and developers and is firmly committed to Linux and other open source programs. 

Surprising is one word for it! Honestly, I'm in shock at this news. Does this mean we can firmly put the "Embrace, extend, and extinguish" phrase to rest and replace it with Embrace, extend, and protect? With Microsoft joining, they're bringing with them around 60,000 patents.

Moves like that, makes me seriously think about how Microsoft have changed, especially since their previous CEO Steve Ballmer called Linux "a cancer".

I think it also shows how far Linux has come as a platform for all things too, especially with Microsoft having a "Windows Subsystem for Linux" along with their support for running Linux on their Azure cloud computing platform.

What do you think to this?

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
22 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
122 comments
Page: «7/7
  Go to:

Kristian Oct 17, 2018
The reason I suspect such a hypothetical situation might be useful is because DirectX has a lot of mindshare, tools, tutorials, books etc and most of all games that actually use it. Have many games ship with DirectX support vs support for open API's?
Direct3D 12 is a completely new graphics API and it isn't that much more established in the industry than Vulkan. As far as I know, only a couple dozen games have released on Windows with D3D12 support thus far, and none of them are D3D12 exclusive.

By the way is Vulkan seeing any widespread adoption by Switch developers? AFAIK Nintendo only offers Vulkan as an alternative to their own API's. If Vulkan was the only option for a major console that would also help alot.
I don't think it matters. As long as a cross-platform API is properly supported, it doesn't need to be the only option. Nintendo wouldn't be a likely candidate to do something like this anyway.

I am just thinking that if Vulkan was the only option on the Switch then more games would have a Vulkan backend and the less work would be needed for a Linux port. If the Switch version of a game uses Vulkan than you have to support it for that anyway. But if the Switch version uses some proprietary Nintendo API, then that would not help porting efforts to Linux. The same goes for Mac and the PS4. There is no official Vulkan support on Mac and AFAIK none at all for the PS4. Never mind Vulkan being obligatory on those platforms.

"Direct3D 12 is a completely new graphics API and it isn't that much more established in the industry than Vulkan."

That is good. Hopefully this time around, the open API can gain the edge over the proprietary one.

I really wish some antitrust authorities or something like that could pressure Microsoft(Windows(DirectX)), Apple(Mac OS/iOS(Metal)) and maybe even the console manufacturers to give up on their proprietary API's. But it is not looking likely.

"As long as a cross-platform API is properly supported, it doesn't need to be the only option."

Didn't the PS3 also offer some form of OpenGL(PSGL?)? But as far as I know hardly anyone used it. It seems that so long as consoles offer proprietary API's that is what developers are going to use.

Edit:

Does anybody here know of actual Switch titles that use Vulkan on the Switch?


Last edited by Kristian on 17 October 2018 at 3:24 pm UTC
tuubi Oct 17, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Does anybody here know of actual Switch titles that use Vulkan on the Switch?
I don't really follow console gaming news, but Doom (2016) and Wolfenstein II might be likely candidates.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.