We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Grab a glass and get ready to pour another as the Wine 3.19 development release has been officially released.

Coming in hot for the 3.19 release are these highlights:

  • Support for file I/O completion modes.
  • WaitOnAddress synchronization primitives.
  • Better support for 32-bit .NET binaries on 64-bit.
  • Improved recovery on broken RPC connection.

As always, there's a plethora of bugs that have been solved as well, with 31 noted as fixed as of this release. The usual note applies: Not all bugs were fixed in this specific release, some were found from earlier releases and only just now marked as solved with some re-testing.

They noted fixes for the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call Of Prypyat DX11 benchmark, Project CARS 2 should no longer hang on startup, Assassin's Creed got a fix for freezing when looking around along with other various fixes for games and applications.

Additionally, Wine 3.19 was updated against Vulkan 1.1.88.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Wine
11 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
16 comments
Page: «2/2
  Go to:

Purple Library Guy Oct 27, 2018
Quoting: jens
Quoting: Ehvis
Quoting: ShmerlThe last remaining milestone for it now is Mesa landing transform feedback patches.

And for a wealthy few, inclusion in the 410 drivers. :D

I would guess that those* few, including me, have to wait for a new short-term drivers version to appear. The 410 driver is a long term driver replacing the 390 series. I don't think that this (410) version will receive such a big feature update. But you never know ;)

* should it be "these" instead of "those" in proper English?
No, I don't think so. The "including me" bit sort of introduces a context shift, new information--up to that point you're still talking as if third person. If you wanted to convey that information without the "including me", you'd say "we few", as in "we happy few". Very Shakespearian.

"These" wouldn't really apply whichever way. The difference between "these" and "those" is subtle, having to do with, ah, immediacy more than anything else ("these" being the ones in front of me, as opposed to "those" over there across the room), but they're both third person. "Those of us" is a weird exception, but it only works in certain formations . . . "Those of us who (bla bla)" and like that.


Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 27 October 2018 at 8:23 pm UTC
jens Oct 28, 2018
  • Supporter
Quoting: Purple Library Guy
Quoting: jens
Quoting: Ehvis
Quoting: ShmerlThe last remaining milestone for it now is Mesa landing transform feedback patches.

And for a wealthy few, inclusion in the 410 drivers. :D

I would guess that those* few, including me, have to wait for a new short-term drivers version to appear. The 410 driver is a long term driver replacing the 390 series. I don't think that this (410) version will receive such a big feature update. But you never know ;)

* should it be "these" instead of "those" in proper English?
No, I don't think so. The "including me" bit sort of introduces a context shift, new information--up to that point you're still talking as if third person. If you wanted to convey that information without the "including me", you'd say "we few", as in "we happy few". Very Shakespearian.

"These" wouldn't really apply whichever way. The difference between "these" and "those" is subtle, having to do with, ah, immediacy more than anything else ("these" being the ones in front of me, as opposed to "those" over there across the room), but they're both third person. "Those of us" is a weird exception, but it only works in certain formations . . . "Those of us who (bla bla)" and like that.

Thanks a lot too, that should really help to remember the differences in the future.

PS: I really like reading your posts. Please keep your wordiness :). I'm really glad to see that there are still lots of people that can tell a coherent story with more than 140 characters.


Last edited by jens on 28 October 2018 at 6:18 pm UTC
Purple Library Guy Oct 28, 2018
Quoting: jens
Quoting: Purple Library Guy
Quoting: jens
Quoting: Ehvis
Quoting: ShmerlThe last remaining milestone for it now is Mesa landing transform feedback patches.

And for a wealthy few, inclusion in the 410 drivers. :D

I would guess that those* few, including me, have to wait for a new short-term drivers version to appear. The 410 driver is a long term driver replacing the 390 series. I don't think that this (410) version will receive such a big feature update. But you never know ;)

* should it be "these" instead of "those" in proper English?
No, I don't think so. The "including me" bit sort of introduces a context shift, new information--up to that point you're still talking as if third person. If you wanted to convey that information without the "including me", you'd say "we few", as in "we happy few". Very Shakespearian.

"These" wouldn't really apply whichever way. The difference between "these" and "those" is subtle, having to do with, ah, immediacy more than anything else ("these" being the ones in front of me, as opposed to "those" over there across the room), but they're both third person. "Those of us" is a weird exception, but it only works in certain formations . . . "Those of us who (bla bla)" and like that.

Thanks a lot too, that should really help to remember the differences in the future.

PS: I really like reading your posts. Please keep you wordiness :). I'm really glad to see that there are still lots of people that can tell a coherent story with more than 140 characters.
Well, thank you very much.
I remember being flabbergasted when Twitter first came out and was popular, and I was like, "But I have email, and it already lets me use as many characters as I want! Why would anyone accept such a horrible limit?" I didn't get it. I sort of see the point of all the follow-y stuff now. But I'd still kind of like to see an anti-Twitter that enforces a minimum post-length.
Ehvis Oct 28, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: GuestInstalling .NET redists on any Wine prefix is my worst nightmare right now. Out of like 50 attempts over the last month I succeeded twice.

And if it does, most things I tried don't really work well. Considering the install size of .NET, why did it ever become a thing? Who wants to deal with that.
Skipperro Oct 29, 2018
Quoting: Xaero_VincentI cannot log into Windows Steam with vanilla Wine 3.18 nor 3.19. Staging works, though. :(

Can anyone else confirm that Windows Steam is broken in the latest vanilla Wine?

Yes, I can confirm that. All I see with 3.19 is small Steam popup saying it's logging in and then it all close and process dies. Sometimes I see error message about missing connection, but after a second it crashes too.

Will have to try staging.
rustybroomhandle Oct 29, 2018
Quoting: devnullHow long before Proton updates though :(

That's what I want to know too. :) I believe this bug is pretty much what is preventing LA Noire from working on Proton.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.
Buy Games
Buy games with our affiliate / partner links: