Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Artifact, Valve’s card game has now officially released and after spending more hours than I will ever admit playing it, here’s some of my own thoughts while played on Linux. Tested on NVIDIA, I don't have an AMD GPU on hand.

Also, before we get into anything, let's note that this is the first Valve game to arrive with Linux support at release!

"We hope all gamers enjoy Artifact, especially fans of Dota 2 and card gaming enthusiasts," said Valve's Gabe Newell. "Working with Richard Garfield has been an incredible opportunity for everyone at Valve, and we look forward to expanding the game with him based upon feedback and input from the community."

Note: Key provided by Valve

I’m a huge fan of card games, however, I rarely get a chance to leave home and go out and play them. For many reasons including money for travel, real life friends or just being too busy. This is why I personally love playing them on PC, it frees up those issues and many more for me. To this day though, there hasn’t really been a trading card game available for Linux that has really hooked me—until now.

"Working on Artifact has been fantastic - a digital card game which really leverages what is made possible by the medium rather than being limited by it," said Richard Garfield. "That has been a long time dream of mine and Valve has been a terrific partner in the development." 

I will cut to the chase early on this one, I honestly really do enjoy it. I find it extremely engrossing! It’s certainly not going to be for everyone, but in terms of the gameplay I think they’ve hit a bit of a sweet spot for complexity versus fun.

It's not just a game, they're also doing some comics to expand the Dota universe. Valve say that they aim for Artifact to be more than just a card game, something which will include a "shared universe with a storyline that will deepen the history, expand the world, and change the fates of the heroes of both games". You can see the first comic, Prelude, right here. The second, Call to Arms, released today which you can find here.

As for the game itself, the gameplay is split across three lanes, like Dota 2 itself, which certainly makes it extremely different to any other comparable card game. You are, essentially, playing three games at the same time. It’s a little nuts, but it doesn’t actually take you all that long to get to grips with it. The overall mechanics aren’t actually that difficult, however, it does still obviously require a lot of time and effort to truly become good at it... something I will openly admit to not being, I suck. Games aren’t always about winning though, if you enjoy it while you fail and possibly learn from it to try something fun for the next game, that’s enough to keep me going. That's the key I've found with it, while it can be frustrating, I've always seen rather clearly what I could have done better and that frustration gets turned around pretty quickly as I queue up for "just one more go".

For a card game, it feels surprisingly alive too. Tons of little touches add up to a vibrant and constantly engaging experience. From the river in the centre passing through all three boards, to some recognisable sounds from Dota 2 and your little familiar practically wetting himself in fear when your tower is about to fall.

There's a lot of game mechanics that I appreciate with the gameplay. You have all the usual suspects like cards that will buff up other cards, spell cards to dish out the pain to your opponent and special improvements to place on your side of the board which can be truly menacing. I went up against a player online, who had a big focus on "improvement" cards which did all sorts of things and it certainly made for an entertaining game. These improvement cards can dish out damage to enemies at the start of a round, replenish your mana to play more cards, attack a single card across any lane and so on. If you manage to combine a few of them in the same lane, the results can be devastating to the other player.

It's the hero system that I especially like, each coming with their own unique ability. On top of that, hero cards also have equipment slots. After you've played an entire round across each lane, you go through a shopping phase where you spend money earned by taking down enemies, this is where you will be able to pick up healing potions for cards, equipment to put on your heroes and so on. What truly makes it interesting, is that when a hero is cut down they will keep their equipment ready for when you get to bring them back into play in a couple of turns. Perhaps you want to strengthen a particular lane, but all your hero cards are already in play? You can also get a card to return them to the fountain, to then place down in a different lane later on. It's all the gameplay elements like that, which keep it thoroughly interesting to play.

The multi-lane approach has tripped me up a good few times. It's a little too easy to become overly focused on how you're doing in one lane, which can result in some spectacular failure. Winning in Artifact can be done in two ways: You can take down two towers in any lane or take down one tower and the Ancient that replaces it in the same lane.

There's never a dull moment in Artifact, that's one thing I'm absolutely certain on. I've seen some extremely varied decks when playing online. In a game I had only earlier today, my opponent had cards to constantly replenish their mana to play more cards, while also constantly locking my cards for a turn. Something I thought was equal parts clever, amusing and annoying.

Even with the annoyance of some of my cards being locked for multiple turns, it all gets turned around when you see your little familiar fly over to the enemy's tower and laugh at it as you're about to annihilate them and win the game. At least, that's what I would like to say, unfortunately for me my enemy had the Zeus hero unit, whose ability annihilated all remaining cards I had in the lane that would win me the game…as I said, never a dull moment.

Artifact offers up multiple game modes, depending on how you're feeling.

  • There's Solo Play bot matches so you never need to face anyone online, which can be quite interesting since bots can play cards you don't own.
  • Social Play will allow you to face off against friends, Open Play which essentially shows you in a list for people in the same Steam groups as you (join our GamingOnLinux Steam Group!) to match up and player created tournaments.
  • Casual Play will allow you to play online against anyone globally, a Constructed mode where you pick a specific deck and attempt to win a series of games with that single deck and then a Phantom Draft mode which lets you make a new deck and edit it before matches.
  • Finally, we come to the Expert Mode which is similar to the Casual Play mode with one major difference—you can win prizes, but this comes at a cost.

That cost, can be Tickets you pay for in a bundle or for the Expert Keeper Draft mode, both Tickets and Booster Packs. Sure, there is an element of increased adrenaline-based excitement because you really don’t want to lose anything, which adds an curious element to it. However, for a game you’ve already spent money on to play and will likely spend more money on to buy extra packs of cards, it just doesn’t feel right having some modes so limited like this. Considering it costs $4.95/£3.95 for only five tickets, that works out to be quite expensive just to play in certain game modes if you’re not good enough to win extra tickets. You can turn unwanted cards into tickets too, although that's at a cost of 20 cards to one ticket which doesn't seem like great value.

On top of that, for a game that isn't free to play, it certainly can end up costing you a lot of money after your initial purchase. There's been a lot of talk about Valve's monetization model with Artifact with it being rather costly in the long-run when buying extra cards. For reference, here's the pricing:

Buying it for $19.99/£15.99/€17.95 will give you:

  • 5 Event tickets
  • 2 Complete Decks
  • 10 Booster Packs

Booster Packs can be purchased in-game for $2/£1.50/€1.75 and will include:

  • 12 random cards
  • At least one card is a rare

Such packs do have an element of gambling to them, since you have no idea what you're getting. That can end up being a lot of money if you don't get the cards you want. Exactly like real-life packs though, but still worth mentioning of course. To me, the cost of the Booster Packs are pretty reasonable though, as someone who buys his kid Pokemon cards often which are quite a bit more expensive (and his collection is rather large…).

Although the Draft mode you can do can offset that somewhat, since you pick different cards each time to construct decks. This way, no one has any kind of edge over the other based on cards they own. That's a pretty big thing, especially for those who don't want to spend any extra.

A deal-breaker for some, might be the fact that there’s no actual ranking system. Like a lot of other games have, competitive play in Artifact doesn’t give you any special rank or badges and so there’s no real feeling of progression outside of either winning or losing. Valve are listening, as they said on Twitter that "Progression is top on the list of things we want to tackle post-launch!".

I do like the fact that I don’t need to chat to people while playing online, for me that’s actually a big bonus. I don’t want to see trash talk or anything, I want to focus and relax. Not that the game is actually relaxing by any stretch, it can suddenly become a very nerve-racking game at any moments notice.

The Linux version has been working really well for me. It hasn’t crashed a single time and they've improved performance since the earlier beta builds, so it's now incredibly smooth for me.

Overall, I like it a lot and will no doubt continue playing it, but I would like it a lot more if there was an actual progression system, plus more ways to earn tickets and cards outside of giving Valve even more money.

You can find Artifact on Steam.

Trailer:

YouTube Thumbnail
YouTube videos require cookies, you must accept their cookies to view. View cookie preferences.
Accept Cookies & Show   Direct Link
Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
19 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
62 comments
Page: 1/4»
  Go to:

Liam Dawe Nov 28, 2018
Ps. I was also on the Destination Linux podcast which just went up, I talk a bit about it there too.
chui2ch Nov 28, 2018
The poll on twitter was really surprising to me. I thought there would be more Linux users interested in Artifact.
kuhpunkt Nov 28, 2018
The fact that valve would rather do this over giving the fans what they really want(half life 3 or anything that is not gwent with dota 2 characters) from valve speaks volumes to how much valve actually cares about the people that play valves games

someone had to say it

One doesn't exclude the other.
edo Nov 28, 2018
why only on linux system requirements says "vulkan cards"?
Lonsfor 9 years Nov 28, 2018
The fact that valve would rather do this over giving the fans what they really want(half life 3 or anything that is not gwent with dota 2 characters) from valve speaks volumes to how much valve actually cares about the people that play valves games

someone had to say it

Why would you say something so controversial yet so brave?
Liam Dawe Nov 28, 2018
I'm note sure if this is a game - because it mostly plays itself. I'm doing the second tutorial match and it's all about the enemies pulling OP cards while I struggle to summon anything. Every lane has a predictable fate from the beginning so far.
Well, yeah. The tutorial is very specific to walk you through...

You can't judge gameplay like that.
Leopard Nov 28, 2018
I'm note sure if this is a game - because it mostly plays itself. I'm doing the second tutorial match and it's all about the enemies pulling OP cards while I struggle to summon anything. Every lane has a predictable fate from the beginning so far.

TUTORIAL
Lonsfor 9 years Nov 28, 2018
Hello fellow gamers i noticed that the tutorial was super easy?? like what is this a game for fake gamers?
Ehvis Nov 29, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
The fact that valve would rather do this over giving the fans what they really want(half life 3 or anything that is not gwent with dota 2 characters) from valve speaks volumes to how much valve actually cares about the people that play valves games

someone had to say it

But could they actually make a game that lives up to the hype?
Keyrock Nov 29, 2018
The fact that valve would rather do this over giving the fans what they really want(half life 3 or anything that is not gwent with dota 2 characters) from valve speaks volumes to how much valve actually cares about the people that play valves games

someone had to say it
I'm a fan and I wanted a card game. Please don't presume to speak on my behalf.

Not to mention, Valve have confirmed that they are working on other games. They are a large company capable of handling multiple projects at once.


Last edited by Keyrock on 29 November 2018 at 2:29 am UTC
Soulutions Nov 29, 2018
So I played around a bit and have been looking for a price for a complete set of cards (every card 3x).
Since you can buy single cards one can just fill up the Buy Cards list with everything that is needed to complete ones set after the initial purchase.
The cost for a complete set hovers around 270€ (this includes the initial purchase of the game).
I am not that familiar with virtual TCGs but I think that is on the lower end of the cost spectrum for a full set isn't it?
Nezchan Nov 29, 2018
I'm not going to be playing Artifact, for the simple reason that I'm not good at card games so paying up front for the privilege of losing a lot has limited appeal.

However, it's a lot better than Valve becoming a sequel factory. Yeah, I've got some great nostalgia for the Half-Life series, but it's been a long time since HL 2ep2 came out (and let's be honest, it wasn't fantastic), and I've had loads of great experiences with loads of great games since then. So it's not the end of the world if I don't get Half-Life 3 but something else I like instead. It's okay. I'll just play In the Valley of Gods when it comes out, and maybe whatever other game Valve eventually releases, assuming it appeals to me. And I'll have fun with it, even if it's not a continuation of a fun experience I had fourteen years ago.

And y'know, that's okay. No point getting upset at a card game over it.
Keyrock Nov 29, 2018
it's literally just pick any digital card game but with dota 2 characters
That's a very ignorant statement. You are implying that all card games are essentially the same, which is very much false. Even just the 2 games you named, Hearthstone and Gwent play completely differently from one another. Artifact plays like neither of them; closer to Hearthstone than Gwent, but because there are 3 lanes it has mechanics and strategies that game doesn't.


Last edited by Keyrock on 29 November 2018 at 3:37 am UTC
wolfyrion Nov 29, 2018
I dont play DOTA or any card games anymore except Clash Royal but that is another story.
I used to play Hearthstone but stopped playing because it was not a native Linux game.

Well the reviews are a bit bad for this game so I dont think atm buying it. I may wait for a discounted price.
All Reviews:Mixed (1,263)
SteamDB Rating: 58.68%
orochi_kyo Nov 29, 2018
Some people here get mad or annoyed just because some of us wants to see HL3 or L4D3. Its true, we can live without these games but not even DOTA 2 Fans asked for this card game.
And the worst thing is the obvious $$ milking model Valve uses on this game, also if they dont balance the use of powerful and rare cards this will become easily a P2W game.
I hope this flops so Valve start to consider to make a single player game but I doubt it, some kids just have much money and these kind of games is a perfect way to spend it.
Lycurgus87 Nov 29, 2018
Pay2Pay game by Valve no thanx. Its unacceptable that you only earn cards if you pay more for a game you actually bought. No quests, no weekly brawl, nothing. I wanted to buy this game than I read 2 buck card pack policy and my first tought was this must be a misunderstanding and they just dont write the obvious that ofc you can earn cards without money. But as it turns out NOPE S****R!

Continue to play heartstone in playonlinux instead.
Keyrock Nov 29, 2018
i'm implying that valve could have made something much better then yet another digital card game that got them booed out of the building when they first announced it

no one not even die hard dota 2 fans asked for or even wanted this game

honestly it's just yet another digital card game when it could have been something better like a whole new franchise from valve that proves they don't need half life to make the next great game

but now it seems like valve just wants to be another EA imo
And there's the elitist attitude. As if card games are somehow inherently an inferior form of gaming. Real gamers don't play such "casual" games, right?
slaapliedje Nov 29, 2018
The only card game I would buy and play on a computer with other people would be Munchkin. Also if there were a computerized version of Munchkin Quest. That would rock!
TheSHEEEP Nov 29, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
What mostly interests me as a MtG player is:
How important are synergies in this?

In MtG, how well your deck ramps up the mana curve and how well each card synergizes with each other card determines success or failure (well, that, some card draw luck and not playing against an "anti-deck").
I'm quite afraid that the 3-lane approach makes synergies way less important if the cards on each lane don't even interact with each other, and then it would just come down do who has the stronger creature where.

Plus, what are the actual card types?
Are you limited to playing stuff only during your turn or can you actually do something during the opponent's turn like in MtG?
TheSHEEEP Nov 29, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Btw... 59% for a Valve game on Steam. Ouch.
Though, at least it seems that most people like the actual core gameplay, but are completely pissed off by everything else around the game.
They really messed up by not including any ranking (basically rendering matchmaking entirely useless) and being extremely greedy with their pricing and not being able to obtain cards without cash (WTF?!). How is this not f2p, if the prices are otherwise so high?

Looking at recent events, it really does seem that A LOT of the big companies are completely losing their touch.
Well, good time for indies, I say!


Last edited by TheSHEEEP on 29 November 2018 at 8:52 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.