Update: Canonical are now saying 32bit libraries will be "frozen" and not entirely dropped.
Original article:
Things are starting to get messy, after Canonical announced the end of 32bit support from Ubuntu 19.10 onwards, Valve have now responded.
Speaking on Twitter, Valve dev Pierre-Loup Griffais said:
Ubuntu 19.10 and future releases will not be officially supported by Steam or recommended to our users. We will evaluate ways to minimize breakage for existing users, but will also switch our focus to a different distribution, currently TBD.
I'm starting to think we might see a sharp U-turn from Canonical, as this is something that would hit them quite hard. Either way, the damage has been done.
I can't say I am surprised by Valve's response here. Canonical pretty clearly didn't think it through enough on how it would affect the desktop. It certainly seems like Canonical also didn't speak to enough developers first.
Perhaps this will give Valve a renewed focus on SteamOS? Interestingly, Valve are now funding some work on KWin (part of KDE).
Looks like I shall be distro hopping very soon…
To journalists from other websites reading: This does not mean the end of Linux support, Ubuntu is just one distribution.
Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
Expected outcome. GOG will probably follow with a similar announcement.
1 Likes, Who?
Quoting: gojulSteamOS being Debian-based, recommending Debian or Mint/Debian would make a lot of sense. But it is true that Debian is not for beginners.
Valve can contribute some resources to make Debian more user friendly. KDE in Debian can surely benefit from more maintainers.
0 Likes
Quotevorlon
June 23
I’m sorry that we’ve given anyone the impression that we are “dropping support for i386 applications”. That’s simply not the case. What we are dropping is updates to the i386 libraries, which will be frozen at the 18.04 LTS versions. But there is every intention to ensure that there is a clear story for how i386 applications (including games) can be run on versions of Ubuntu later than 19.10.
2 Likes, Who?
Frozen 32-bit libs are not acceptable either. They should move forward, or there should be a solution to run 32-bit stuff on up to date 64-bit libraries base. Stale 32-bit libraries are very poor workaround for dropping 32-bit support.
Last edited by Shmerl on 23 June 2019 at 3:24 am UTC
Last edited by Shmerl on 23 June 2019 at 3:24 am UTC
7 Likes, Who?
gradyvuckovic Jun 23, 2019
Quoting: wvstolzingQuoting: gradyvuckovicQuoting: keanI would even pay for it if everything works well.
I'd happily sign up to that, $10/month for a Valve developed Linux OS which provides the best possible gaming experience for Linux? Hell yes, give me that.
Kinda off-topic but I'm somewhat terrified that the idea of a 'subscription model' OS comes so naturally to people nowadays.
Why not? It's no different to using Linux Mint and donating per month to the Linux Mint team via the development fund, or patreon. Developing an OS costs resources, usually money, and those costs occur every month, not just the month you buy the OS. If you sell an OS as a product with a one off fee, then the company who makes it is just required to keep putting out new versions and selling those too, otherwise they have no revenue.
I'm not talking about $10/month as some kind of massive money making scheme for Valve. I would be very surprised if they would make even a profit off that, but the $10/month should be viewed just as a contribution to their efforts and to ensure they have at least some incentive to always keep going with the OS.
Part of the problem with Ubuntu, is that Canonical makes basically $0 from any of us. We don't buy anything from them, we don't pay them for their services, we don't donate, nothing. They have zero reason to care if they break support for games because they don't make any money from gaming. Just paying $10/month to a company for them to develop an OS, could at least help us establish a relationship with that company, where we can expect regular fast updates, proper support, polished UX, etc.
I'm happy to pay for high quality software, foss or not. A high quality Linux OS with great support would be worth paying for.
3 Likes, Who?
Quoting: gradyvuckovicQuoting: wvstolzingQuoting: gradyvuckovicQuoting: keanI would even pay for it if everything works well.
I'd happily sign up to that, $10/month for a Valve developed Linux OS which provides the best possible gaming experience for Linux? Hell yes, give me that.
Kinda off-topic but I'm somewhat terrified that the idea of a 'subscription model' OS comes so naturally to people nowadays.
Why not?
[...]
I'm happy to pay for high quality software, foss or not. A high quality Linux OS with great support would be worth paying for.
This is a very healthy attitude and the only way to go forward. I have been donating to Canonical (and other OSS software I use regularly) over the years myself, however Linux community at large (i.e. not just Linux gamers) tends to despise commercial, for-profit software even when it is open source. High quality commercial Linux OS with a paid support will look too much as Windows + WSL2 to a lot of folks. Canonical itself was and is not liked much.
Lack of monetary feedback (or clarity about that feedback) for the desktop Linux is in my opinion the reason why its (desktop) market share is so tiny. But at the same time, a commercial distro from your example would be fighting an uphill battle. After all, people are attracted to Linux because a) it's free as in freedom and b) it's free as in free beer. Commercial distro designed for gaming would by definition incorporate closed source software so it would be neither, and as such it would have a much harder time attracting users.
1 Likes, Who?
Quoting: RCLCommercial distro designed for gaming would by definition incorporate closed source software so it would be neither, and as such it would have a much harder time attracting users.
Linux users won't appreciate a distro, that pushes for blobs (besides games themselves).
2 Likes, Who?
Quoting: GuestIf they can get KDE on the development side, I think Plagman would be a happy camper for rebasing SteamOS on this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=VxA-vim715w
I'd rather them work on Plasma Console or Plasma Gaming version. Making an open gaming UI would be better than any closed one.
2 Likes, Who?
Quoting: ShmerlQuoting: RCLCommercial distro designed for gaming would by definition incorporate closed source software so it would be neither, and as such it would have a much harder time attracting users.
Linux users won't appreciate a distro, that pushes for blobs (besides games themselves).
I meant games, it's enough for the point I was making (neither free as in freedom nor free as in free beer). Linux gamers are obviously Okay with this, but Linux community at large not always is, so a proposed commercial distro would be a tough sell. Still, I personally would support it.
0 Likes
Patreon
PayPal
See more from me