Two big bits of AMD news to share with you this morning, as they appear to be going from strength to strength as a company.
Firstly, this week their financial reports went out and their strong growth has continued. The latest results cover the fourth quarter of last year and the annual results, on the whole they're doing well with around a 50% increase when compared with Q4 in 2018. For 2019 as a whole, they were up about 4% on revenue compared with 2018.
During the conference call following the report, AMD CEO Lisa Su announced (~42:10) that "So in 2019, we launched our new architecture in GPUs. It's the RDNA architecture, and that was the Navi-based products. You should expect that those will be refreshed in 2020, and we'll have a next-generation RDNA architecture that will be part of our 2020 line up.". Su stated that more will be detailed about them "at our financial analyst day" which should be in March. Once the info is out, we will let you know.
A strong AMD is good news for the industry, since it helps keep both Intel and NVIDIA in check on prices and keeps them all pushing technology forwards. It's also great to see AMD aren't slowing down on pushing out more advanced hardware, especially powerful GPUs to compete with NVIDIA.
How is the driver support? I am planning to upgrade my CPU and GPU (1600 and 1060) to a 3600/3600x and 5600XT. I had issues in the past with my RX 480, but never with the 1060. Would you recommend switching back to AMD?
Opinions vary on this. :D
It's like asking which distribution is the best, just with two sides instead of a dozen. ;)
(My experiences with the Nvidia driver are very good. Can't say anything about the AMD side of things.)
Last edited by Eike on 30 January 2020 at 12:44 pm UTC
How is the driver support? I am planning to upgrade my CPU and GPU (1600 and 1060) to a 3600/3600x and 5600XT. I had issues in the past with my RX 480, but never with the 1060. Would you recommend switching back to AMD?
The AMD GPU drivers are now part of the kernel, I'm running on AMD RX 590 and don't have any issue at all.
How is the driver support? I am planning to upgrade my CPU and GPU (1600 and 1060) to a 3600/3600x and 5600XT. I had issues in the past with my RX 480, but never with the 1060. Would you recommend switching back to AMD?
I wouldn't do that, the 5600XT had a very bad launch. You don't know if you will get the card previous vBios or the new one, with higher clocks. Also have in mind that the card only has 6Gig of ram and with the new console generation the vRAM requirements are going to increase, so at least search for an 8 gig card.
If i were you a would wait to see new launches, the card can hold a little longer and also the cpu.
Nvidia also has a new architecture, that will mean that previous generations will drop in price to clear inventory, so you can pick a 5700/2070 with the money of a 5600/2060.
Last edited by somebody1121 on 30 January 2020 at 12:42 pm UTC
How is the driver support? I am planning to upgrade my CPU and GPU (1600 and 1060) to a 3600/3600x and 5600XT. I had issues in the past with my RX 480, but never with the 1060. Would you recommend switching back to AMD?
My partner's Rx Vega 56 has some driver issue that causes it to hang the system due to a bug with undervolting at high load. We applied some kernel workarounds to fix it, and ordered a bigger PSU so it won't need to undervolt. So, I guess there are issues, but in general it performs very well.
Could my dream finally come true. And AMD GPU which is stronger as my GTX 1080? *-*I am very certain they have done that :) https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=RX-5600-XT-New-vBIOS-Plus-ACO). AMD is doing a hammering of a great job on the Linux side of things for once. Alongside Valves help as well.
How is the driver support? I am planning to upgrade my CPU and GPU (1600 and 1060) to a 3600/3600x and 5600XT. I had issues in the past with my RX 480, but never with the 1060. Would you recommend switching back to AMD?
I wouldn't do that, the 5600XT had a very bad launch. You don't know if you will get the card previous vBios or the new one, with higher clocks. Also have in mind that the card only has 6Gig of ram and with the new console generation the vRAM requirements are going to increase, so at least search for an 8 gig card.
If i were you a would wait to see new launches, the card can hold a little longer and also the cpu.
Nvidia also has a new architecture, that will mean that previous generations will drop in price to clear inventory, so you can pick a 5700/2070 with the money of a 5600/2060.
That is not a problem for me, I have 70+ AMD cards for mining, I have no issue with BIOS tinkering :D Only the driver issues I had in the past.
That is not a problem for me, I have 70+ AMD cards for mining, I have no issue with BIOS tinkering :D Only the driver issues I had in the past.
Ah, as you mention mining: I sold my old hardware on eBay (for the first time) and wondered why anybody would want my very old GTX660. Do you happen to know if it's useful for mining?
That is not a problem for me, I have 70+ AMD cards for mining, I have no issue with BIOS tinkering :D Only the driver issues I had in the past.
Ah, as you mention mining: I sold my old hardware on eBay (for the first time) and wondered why anybody would want my very old GTX660. Do you happen to know if it's useful for mining?
No clue, it is too ineffective for any mining, I only mine ethash with my GPUs. I have cheap electricity and it is still only 30-35% profit vs 65-70% electricity cost
How is the driver support?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IbyHTm1rTk
...
It still looks like it's not a huge achievement. The GTX 1080 is 4 years old in a few month while the 5700 XT was released Q3 2019 which is not a year ago. And has the same performance as the GTX 1080 (-1% with out BIOS and ACO update) which is pretty bad for a 2019 GPU vs a 2016 GPU.
...
The 5700 XT's launch price was nearly half that of the 1080. 25% smaller die size while having 3 million more transistors, due to newer process size. While in Linux, the two are in most cases, performing the same (room for AMD drivers to improve) in Windows, the 5700 XT is on average, 20% faster.
Hence why GamersNexus rated it best GPU of 2019.
I imagine, in 6-12 months, drivers for Navi will improve, and the 5700 (along with all other Navi/RDNA 1.0 cards) will perform at least 10% and maybe even up to 20% faster than it does now. And that from open source drivers, that are in the kernel, available right from fresh install of Linux, in any distribution, not needing to mess with the installation of binary drivers.
It still looks like it's not a huge achievement.
The GTX 1080 is 4 years old in a few month while the 5700 XT was released Q3 2019 which is not a year ago.
And has the same performance as the GTX 1080 (-1% with out BIOS and ACO update) which is pretty bad for a 2019 GPU vs a 2016 GPU.
If we look at the Phoronix Benchmarks, the RTX 2060 SUPER is 0.2 FPS behind the 5700 XT + ACO and the RTX 2080 SUPER is as fast as the GTX 1080 according to: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1080-vs-Nvidia-RTX-2060S-Super/3603vs4049
So even the BIOS Update did not achieved that much.
That's why I hope they will finally make stronger GPUs so I can make the switch.
This year seems complicated for amd* gpus because actual amd 7nm gpus dont have same nvidia 12nm turing tdp (gtx cards) and on rtx cards only stay closer
*on cpu side, i think them can give very good news with zen 3
But now nvidia with 7nm, is possible see for example geforce gtx 1660 super performance without power connector**
**on amd this seems impossible now, them need throw actual gpu designs
^_^
Last edited by mrdeathjr on 30 January 2020 at 6:16 pm UTC
...
It still looks like it's not a huge achievement. The GTX 1080 is 4 years old in a few month while the 5700 XT was released Q3 2019 which is not a year ago. And has the same performance as the GTX 1080 (-1% with out BIOS and ACO update) which is pretty bad for a 2019 GPU vs a 2016 GPU.
...
The 5700 XT's launch price was nearly half that of the 1080. 25% smaller die size while having 3 million more transistors, due to newer process size. While in Linux, the two are in most cases, performing the same (room for AMD drivers to improve) in Windows, the 5700 XT is on average, 20% faster.
Hence why GamersNexus rated it best GPU of 2019.
I imagine, in 6-12 months, drivers for Navi will improve, and the 5700 (along with all other Navi/RDNA 1.0 cards) will perform at least 10% and maybe even up to 20% faster than it does now. And that from open source drivers, that are in the kernel, available right from fresh install of Linux, in any distribution, not needing to mess with the installation of binary drivers.
Both of you seem to have forgot the VII which is faster than both released feb last year
Some details here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDyP9nDw_q0
Last edited by Shmerl on 30 January 2020 at 6:44 pm UTC
Both of you seem to have forgot the VII which is faster than both released feb last year
And discontinued 6 months later, upon the release of the 5700 XT, which was less than 5% slower on average, not having the HBM2 memory, while nearly half the price. I didn't forget about it, just had no need to mention it.
This year seems complicated for amd* gpus because actual amd 7nm gpus dont have same nvidia 12nm turing tdp (gtx cards) and on rtx cards only stay closer
*on cpu side, i think them can give very good news with zen 3
But now nvidia with 7nm, is possible see for example geforce gtx 1660 super performance without power connector**
**on amd this seems impossible now, them need throw actual gpu designs
^_^
No argument there. Nvidia's Pascal architecture was an amazing feat. It provided huge performance with an incredibly low power consumption. That said, GF 14NM process was not as good as TSMC's 16NM, so AMD got huge gains just by moving to TSMC's 7nm. Nvidia will be moving there, potentially this year, but I wouldn't expect it until September at the earliest. AMD should have big Navi release by July at the latest.
AMD has huge potential with their upcoming designed. They have huge 7nm experience now, from 2 previous generations of cards released to 7nm. The upcoming "Big Navi" might even be on the newer 7nm+ node.
It's all speculation at this point, but I think 2020 will be the year where the GPU wars heat up again, after years of disappointment from AMD.
No argument there. Nvidia's Pascal architecture was an amazing feat. It provided huge performance with an incredibly low power consumption.
That said, GF 14NM process was not as good as TSMC's 16NM, so AMD got huge gains just by moving to TSMC's 7nm.
Nvidia will be moving there, potentially this year, but I wouldn't expect it until September at the earliest. AMD should have big Navi release by July at the latest.
AMD has huge potential with their upcoming designed. They have huge 7nm experience now, from 2 previous generations of cards released to 7nm. The upcoming "Big Navi" might even be on the newer 7nm+ node.
It's all speculation at this point, but I think 2020 will be the year where the GPU wars heat up again, after years of disappointment from AMD.
personally see nvidia launch 7nm gpus before out big navi, maybe in some place around gtc 2020 but only 3070 - 3080
and 3080ti around big navi launch
hopefully amd can make something but for now seems nvidia put a big jump this time (similar to pascal)
however if amd goes bad in gpus, ryzen still saving the day
^_^
See more from me