Any of our readers remember Driver 2? I remember spending absolutely hours driving around in this classic PlayStation game and now maybe you can relive it or experience it for the first time.
Thanks to a developer working on an open source (MIT licensed) game engine, using a little reverse engineering magic the game has be reborn. Like a lot of open source game engine reimplementations (OpenMW, OpenRA, openXcom), it does need you to own the original game to have the data files as this is just the code that is being offered - which means hopefully any rights holders will leave it alone.
Direct Link
Their current goals include to make the game playable from start to finish, with all game modes working as intended. Eventually, they want to rewrite it all to properly upgrade it with modern stuff. You can get it running on Linux, and the lead developer has a GitHub issue open indicating they're looking for help to sort out automatic Linux (and macOS) builds.
You can find it on GitHub.
it shouldnt be
I played San Francisco which is a good game, but it's boring
Quoting: elmapuli wonder why its easier to reverse enginering an game than making an free open source alternative to it...Actually no. Making an engine for an existing game is much easier. You have a fixed target and all the art assets are already done.
it shouldnt be
Quoting: elmapuli wonder why its easier to reverse enginering an game than making an free open source alternative to it...
it shouldnt be
Traditionally for game makers, about half the budget goes to marketing. Asset creation is almost all of the rest. Making the game engine, while both critical and often difficult, is only a small part of the whole. Content is also difficult to do incrementally: you need your story to happen in the right order, and you want all of your artwork to look good before people see it.
Regarding asset creation, there seem to be a lot of highly talented freelancers out there (thinking of all the elder scroll mods) who would be capable of competing easily with high end titles. But why would a team like that not ask for money instead? ;-)
I kinda get it. It's somewhere between deciphering ancient hieroglyphs and restoring an old barn find. Plus the opportunity to study an old favorite from a whole new perspective, learning new things about the game, and possibly the minds who created it.
Anyhow, that's a pretty slick trailer! Makes me want to get out there, steal Eleanor and try some Halicki stunts!
Quoting: fagnerlnThis reminds me that I never finished the tutorial on Driver 1... lolHoly shit, that MANDATORY tutorial was so difficult. It didn't help that there were no real instructions on how to perform the required stunts to get past the tutorial within the time limit. It got fun after that...
I played San Francisco which is a good game, but it's boring
It's also worth pointing out that this is a free-roam, open-world game that came out before GTA3 (its big “thing” was that, unlike the first game, Tanner could walk around outside his car and steal other ones). A lot of people saw GTA3 as DMA/Rockstar's answer to Driver 2.
Quoting: fagnerlnI played San Francisco which is a good game, but it's boringThat's the trouble, of course: a true sequel would basically be GTA in real-world locations with more driving and no gunplay. Which doesn't sound like much fun. The two series seemed very alike back in the day, but Rockstar clearly had the more engaging formula, concentrating on the on-foot side with the cars coming second.
When Ubisoft decided to bring Driver back, to give them their due they did try to mix it up and do something different, which, yeah, made a decent enough game, but it ended up being neither very interesting or recognisably Driver.
*I took something of a sabbatical from gaming in the '90s, but when a friend of mine upgraded to the PlayStation 2, he very generously passed his PS1 to me. Since this game came out at the very tail end of that console's life I was able to play it pretty soon after release.
Quoting: ronnocAny Linux build up yet? I have the original disks, but the release in GH is only an .exe. Would like a native build!I'm trying, but I doubt anyone has built it on anything but Windows? There's a an unguarded "#include "windows.h" in one place, and lot and lots of little things that seems to trip up gcc on my system but presumably works fine in VS.
Quoting: whizseQuoting: ronnocAny Linux build up yet? I have the original disks, but the release in GH is only an .exe. Would like a native build!I'm trying, but I doubt anyone has built it on anything but Windows? There's a an unguarded "#include "windows.h" in one place, and lot and lots of little things that seems to trip up gcc on my system but presumably works fine in VS.
I fixed it, see https://github.com/OpenDriver2/REDRIVER2/pull/24
if you want to build it for yourself, execute the following:
git clone https://github.com/OpenDriver2/REDRIVER2
cd REDRIVER2
curl https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/OpenDriver2/REDRIVER2/pull/24.patch -LO
patch -p1 < 24.patch
cd src_rebuild
premake5 gmake
make -j4
then check "Bin/Debug" for the executable
Quoting: ronnocAny Linux build up yet? I have the original disks, but the release in GH is only an .exe. Would like a native build!
Patch to make it compile, and also amazingly link:
https://pastebin.com/iyGdgzwx
Also, it uses premake5 of all things. I mean an alpha build? Come on!
Build instructions goes like:
Install/build premake5
cd src_rebuild
premake5 gmake
make
fun stuff in bin/Debug/
Quoting: Rosalie[snipped long post]Dang! Beaten by 18 minutes, and a much cleaner patch too!
Quick patch below. I assume C++ have a rich standard library with something to do proper path concatenation, but I'm too lazy to find out.
There are a lot of different ways to have fun with games!
diff --git a/src_rebuild/GAME/C/SYSTEM.C b/src_rebuild/GAME/C/SYSTEM.C
index 6b8710a..e3f96dd 100644
--- a/src_rebuild/GAME/C/SYSTEM.C
+++ b/src_rebuild/GAME/C/SYSTEM.C
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ OTTYPE* _OT2 = NULL; // 0xF7200
char* _primTab1 = NULL; // 0xFB400
char* _primTab2 = NULL; // 0x119400
char* _replay_buffer = NULL; // 0x1FABBC
-char gDataFolder[32] = "DRIVER2\\";
+char gDataFolder[32] = "DRIVER2/";
#ifdef USE_CRT_MALLOC
diff --git a/src_rebuild/utils/video_source/VideoPlayer.cpp b/src_rebuild/utils/video_source/VideoPlayer.cpp
index 4fd478d..c8b598c 100644
--- a/src_rebuild/utils/video_source/VideoPlayer.cpp
+++ b/src_rebuild/utils/video_source/VideoPlayer.cpp
@@ -604,14 +604,14 @@ void DoPlayFMV(RENDER_ARG* arg, int subtitles)
fd /= 10;
char filename[250];
- sprintf(filename, "%sFMV\\%d\\RENDER%d.STR[0].AVI", gDataFolder, fd, arg->render);
+ sprintf(filename, "%sFMV/%d/RENDER%d.STR[0].avi", gDataFolder, fd, arg->render);
ReadAVI readAVI(filename);
// also load subtitle file
if (subtitles)
{
- sprintf(filename, "%sFMV\\%d\\RENDER%d.SBN", gDataFolder, fd, arg->render);
+ sprintf(filename, "%sFMV/%d/RENDER%d.SBN", gDataFolder, fd, arg->render);
InitSubtitles(filename);
}
else
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ void DoPlayFMV(RENDER_ARG* arg, int subtitles)
if(arg->credits)
{
- sprintf(filename, "%sDATA\\CREDITS.ENG", gDataFolder);
+ sprintf(filename, "%sDATA/CREDITS.ENG", gDataFolder);
InitCredits(filename);
}
Quoting: DuncOoh, I've a lot of fond memories of this. In fact, it's one of the few 20-ish-year-old games I do have any genuine nostalgia for, because I didn't play most of the big names until much later.* It was the first game where I felt like I was really travelling the world. I'm sure the depictions of the real-world cities weren't remotely accurate, but they were closer than we'd ever seen before.
My first experience with this feeling of travel sits squarely with GTA: San Andreas. The only one after that perhaps was years later with Minecraft. If only the San Andreas Multiplayer project were an engine reimplementation, I would have built and run it already.
A friend of mine has one of the Driver games on one of those tiny game emulator boards. It's just the demo though and it didn't run very well on the little SBC.
See more from me