Do you use Discord? Well if these reports are to be trusted, it looks like they might get a new owner under Microsoft.
In an article on Bloomberg which cites anonymous sources "familiar with the matter", Microsoft are apparently in talks to buy Discord for more than $10 billion USD. This follows from another article from VentureBeat that claims Discord has been exploring options for a sale and has "signed an exclusive acquisition discussion with one party". Earlier this month the WSJ talked about how Discord revenue has increased quite a lot to $130 million in 2020 (up from $45 million in 2019) but it's not actually profitable yet.
For the Linux support of Discord, if Microsoft did acquire it we don't expect much to change. Discord's Linux client is full of issues that never get solved so Microsoft can't do much worse - we could even see an improvement perhaps. Nowadays Microsoft aren't exactly the same when it comes to Linux with the likes of Teams, Visual Studio Code and Edge all on Linux in some form. Microsoft are also the owners of GitHub which huge parts of the open source community entirely rely on.
Still, with all the acquisitions Microsoft has done, that's a lot to have under a single roof. This continued consolidation across the gaming industry is pretty concerning. Some companies really do end up with far too much influence and power.
How do you feel about this?
Quoting: PublicNuisanceI refused to touch Discord before this and would not see this as a reason to start.I stayed away from it for a long time as well... and then more and more of the projects I hang out around have decided to start using it (like Foundry VTT, AtariVCS, GURPS, etc). That's the only reason I ever created an account. But much like most other chat systems, I make up info. :P
I hoped for a worse name than Microsoft, but seems to be all we get. I hope they fuck it up gloriously and people mass-migrate to things like discourse and matrix.
Yes, probably not every kid and their dog can create their own servers then, but there is no free lunch anyway, right.
Quoting: GuestI'm already on Element. Actually I was using the Librem Chat client, but it's a little weird, seems Element sets up the encryption keys a lot easier.Quoting: slaapliedjeWhy are you pointing out the obvious, that we're furs? X3Quoting: GuestAvatar matches.Quoting: KithopAh okie, yep can't have persistence without storage, and Tox doesn't have p2p storage implemented, most likely intentionally since anonymity, privacy, and security is the goal. You also can't have users directly joining a group chat and instead they have to have one of the users of the group add them to their private contact list first. Sounds like Element might be better in that case for organizing furmeets, furry cons, etc then.Quoting: GuestNeat, hadn't heard of that one. One advantage Tox has over it though is decentralization and possibly anonymity. You don't have to use anyone's specific server, i.e. everyone is a server since it's purely p2p.
Once the next major release of toxcore is out, group chats will have file sharing, so it will be more Element-like in that regard. But cool that there seem to be some other secure options out there. ^n.n^
Yeah, taking a real quick look at that, it reminds me that I've also played around with Jami in the past (previously GNU Ring), but honestly the thing I like about Matrix is that it is a bit more persisent/organized in that you can administer a server, moderate it, etc. - I'm thinking more for organizing a gaming guild, or a convention... something that blurs the lines between business-focused Slack/Teams, but with better voice UI.
Just doing ad-hoc group chats, yeah - that's got a few more options, thankfully.
Quoting: PhiladelphusI'll grudgingly admit they've managed not to run GitHub into the ground yet
They put Nat Friedman in charge of it; he's an old GNOME hacker, that ended up at Microsoft as part of the Ximian/Xamarin acquisition.
Quoting: GuestAnd WSL still runs like garbage on it :PQuoting: scaineI closed my GitHub account the moment that deal went through and I'll do the same if this happens to Discord. It's a shame, as I like the Discord experience, even though I gave up on their client (I only run it in the web now), but as an old, jaded long time techie, I won't have anything to do with Microsoft. Nothing they do absolves them of the hurt they bring to this industry day in and day out with their legal strong-arming, proprietary lock in, aggressive acquisitions and baffling licensing. They can "love Linux" all they want, I'll have nothing to do with them.its amazing that their love for linux so far has been one sided. sided to microsofts best interest of course. everything has been centered around making linux things run smoother, and better on windows. to attract linux developers, to windows, to develop their linux things, on windows. none of it has actually benefited linux at all.
if microsoft truly loved linux like they claim, they would start opening up some important stuff. like directx. contribute to wine, etc. if they actively contributed to wine, i would feel far more comfortable with their work on WSL for example.
Github is fine after their acquisition. As is Minecraft (if not better, actually).
Skype just went downhill after MS took over.
Those are honestly the only projects that MS bought that I had any personal interest in.
I don't really care enough for Discord to react one way or the other.
I'll just keep using it as needed, unless it becomes crappy now.
Quoting: PhiladelphusI'm no fan of Microsoft buying anything, but I'll grudgingly admit they've managed not to run GitHub into the ground yet, so…50-50 Discord will still be worth using in a few years?
It's not about running it to the ground or not, it's about the problem of having your greatest enemy being in charge of your secret operations headquarters. Yeah, I'm saying it in a somewhat tongue in cheek manner, but the truth is, the ONLY thing that's changed in regards to Microsoft vs Linux is that Linux has managed to grow up tremendously and has completely taken over the server/backend space, and so Microsoft, who is the sore loser of the server/backend race, has been forced to treat Linux as a real business competitor instead of just a small time fish that can be safely slandered as "cancer" and then promptly ignored. And the way it treats its real competitors is, like a guy already posted above, Capitalism 101; ie EEE all over again, part of which is aggressively buying out pieces of your competition and thus slowly chipping away at the things that make them strong.
TL;DR having my business competitor control my center of operations is a big NO in my books.
Last edited by Nocifer on 24 March 2021 at 12:42 pm UTC
See more from me