Like the idea of Total War games but find them complicated or want something similar that takes a bit less time? Roma Invicta is a new indie release that looks promising.
"In Roma Invicta you have the honor of conquering ancient Gaul with your Roman legions. The game combines action oriented real-time battles with turn-based strategy on the campaign map where you raise, supply and move your armies.
The game can best be described as a mixture of the old Amiga classic 'North and South' and the 'Total War' series."
The developer mentioned they've tried to keep it reasonably historically accurate, and battles will leave a lasting impression on the environment with fallen soldiers, arrows sticking around, craters from cannon fire and more.
Direct Link
Game Features:
- Experience a lovingly handcrafted scenery of ancient Gaul.
- Recruit your troops from legionnaires to scorpion artillery to Germanic cavalry.
- Fight in tactical and action-packed real-time battles with hundreds of individual soldiers.
- Slow down or pause the battle to always stay in control and give orders with no hurry.
- Hand over parts of your army to the AI to always keep control even in larger battles.
- Supply your troops and always pay attention to the changing of the seasons.
- You decide whether to bring peace to the Gallic villages or whether to plunder them and thus further ignite the resistance against you.
- Different starting conditions and difficulty levels ensure replay value.
Available to buy on Steam.
> conquering ancient Gaul with your Roman legions
> reasonably historically accurate
> craters from cannon fire
I think that's from the developer's website where they're comparing persistent effects to North & South not about Roma Invicta itself
Quoting: mircallaLooks interesting, but...
> conquering ancient Gaul with your Roman legions
> reasonably historically accurate
> craters from cannon fire
I think that's from the developer's website where they're comparing persistent effects to North & South not about Roma Invicta itself
But but but the gauls had astrix and obelix, and obelix would trash those Romans around leaving craters and such every ;)
Quoting: BumadarBut but but the gauls had astrix and obelix, and obelix would trash those Romans around leaving craters and such every ;)
Oh you're right, and I'm pretty sure I've seen Getafix's cauldron used as artillery...
Last edited by mircalla on 11 February 2022 at 3:48 pm UTC
Quoting: mircallaAlso menhirs. And I think the bard, although that might not have been on purpose.Quoting: BumadarBut but but the gauls had astrix and obelix, and obelix would trash those Romans around leaving craters and such every ;)
Oh you're right, and I'm pretty sure I've seen Getafix's cauldron used as artillery...
Quote> reasonably historically accurateDid I miss something here?
> craters from cannon fire
Quoting: ValckCannons were developed at the earliest in 11th or 12th century (CE) China before making their way over to Europe, by which time Roma was thoroughly victa.Quote> reasonably historically accurateDid I miss something here?
> craters from cannon fire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNBJmDFXIP4
Last edited by hardpenguin on 12 February 2022 at 7:56 pm UTC
Quoting: mircallaI guess I was taking the quote from your comment when I was thinking I was looking at the article.Quoting: ValckCannons were developed at the earliest in 11th or 12th century (CE) China before making their way over to Europe, by which time Roma was thoroughly victa.Quote> reasonably historically accurateDid I miss something here?
> craters from cannon fire
Basically, I was trying to say the same, ie. cannons being anachronistic in a game about the Roman Empire, except I didn't care enough to look up the publisher's site to see where that bit came from (which realistically, should be the journalist's job to spot, stop, and think twice *wink*)
In today's internet, you never know who might fall for Roman cannons as historical fact. Or is that "alternative truth"? :D
See more from me