Stadia continues the slow downward spiral

It's quite bittersweet.

Egoistically, I do take great glee in watching Google's stuff crash and burn. I despise Google, I've been anti-Stadia from the get-go; it all just seems absurd. Especially Stadia Pro, buy games individually AND pay monthly? Sure you do that on Xbox and PlayStation as well, but this time you don't have any right to even download your game files and keep them locally, no guarantee that the service will stay online and let you play your purchased games. You aren't entitled to them at all, good gosh!

Now I'm not really a fan of streaming services anyways, and when I do stream games to a device (such as my Nintendo Switch with Ubuntu), I use my own computer as a host so I can (mostly) be in complete control.

But if, as you say, Stadia really is a good way for people on low-cost devices to enjoy a hassle-free spit of video games, that is truly a shame. I certainly hope someone can come up with a more elegant solution that'll enable this kind of entry point to playing games, and that isn't as unstable as the other services you mentioned.


Last edited by ridge on 5 February 2022 at 12:42 pm UTC

Stadia has the best tech, but bad marketing and not-so-good business model. I just hope that they have an exit plan that does not leave customers in the lurch.

Yeah. I predicted this when it launched that 2 years down the road it will be pretty much in maintenance mode.
Terrible Launch, awful business model, restricted to some countries only, not enough games and so on i guess.

Especially Stadia Pro, buy games individually AND pay monthly?

buy games individually OR pay monthly

You can buy individual games and never pay monthly.
You can pay monthly (Stadia Pro) and get access to free games (and bigger discounts) and never pay for games individually.
If you buy individual games, you will have access to them regardless if you choose (or abandon) Stadia Pro or not.
The Stadia Pro free games library size depends on how older subscriber you are, I'm a bit late, so I have only 130 or so.
Edit: there are also some free games that you can play without paying anything.

My problem with Stadia is that seems to be stagnating and some later games are having (at launch at least) some performance issues. Games usually run excellent on Stadia, but a couple of these screwups can totally ruin the perception. Control for example even now runs like crap, and is a big title that people will go for. It looks like their hardware hasn't been updated in a while, and what was good HW few years ago is now already obsolete.
They're not doing much also in terms of expanding the service (and its quality) to other countries. GFN somehow managed to open new centers in East-Europe, dramatically decreasing the latency. Google did not, and this is mind boggling considering who they are.


Last edited by dubigrasu on 5 February 2022 at 3:25 pm UTC

They're not doing much also in terms of expanding the service (and its quality) to other countries. GFN somehow managed to open new centers in East-Europe, dramatically decreasing the latency. Google did not, and this is mind boggling considering who they are.

so, it seems its better to be a big fish in a small pound, than on a larger one.

google killed orkut because it only had 67 millions of users, they got envious of facebook and end up with nothing instead.
they killed many projects as if they were nothing, then people remember and didnt gave stadia a chance.
i`m not saying that was the only factor of course.

the issue is, if stadia was an product of an smaller company maybe they would value more whetever profit it made, but they didnt.

microsoft purchasing activision/blizzard/king didnt seem to help.
if it was google, then people would stop saying things like "google isnt taking it serious" "google gonna kill stadia", but google didnt had the balls, i wont say they should even if they could, microsoft first purchase with Rare was an disaster, and while amazon were dumping hundreds of millions on flop games, google strategy was smarther:
make some low budget games to gain know how in the market, then grow then slowly over time, but that didnt worked, because people saw their games as cheap and that coming from an big company didnt send an good signal.

google should have said something like:
"big games take time to do, we are doing this <show an promissing AAA quality game> meanwhile we gonna make smaller games to have more exclusive content on the platform while people wait for the big relases"
instead they let people think the product didnt had any ambitions, and killed stadia devlopment division.


they also should give some assurance that you could access your games elsewhere in case they discontinue the service, and if one game currently was only possible with the cloud, because it had some exclusive tech that was only possible on stronger hardware, give some assurance that they would make it avaliable to download as soon as the desktop hardware catch up with the requirments.

nope, they let people think their plan was to sell you the right to own nothing, sell you an game they fully control and can shut down it at any moment.

I tried it (in the free month), but the quality was terrible, although it may be the specificity of my internet or dedicated data centers for my country (Poland).

buy games individually OR pay monthly

buy games individually OR pay monthly or just play the free games.

I got a few games from Stadia via of their rewards program. The rest of the games I play on there are free. No pro or payment card needed.

I tried it (in the free month), but the quality was terrible, although it may be the specificity of my internet or dedicated data centers for my country (Poland).

That's surprising considering that they did opened last year a center in Warsaw. I had high hopes in it because it is closer geographically to me, but somehow the connection to/from it is worse than the connection to the distant Frankfurt center, which I still use.

buy games individually OR pay monthly

buy games individually OR pay monthly or just play the free games.

I got a few games from Stadia via of their rewards program. The rest of the games I play on there are free. No pro or payment card needed.

Oh yeah, forgot about that one :) Not sure how many they are, I think is at least Destiny 2, which can be a real time sink-hole.

I just hope they will permit Stadia controllers to be paired via Bluetooth, when they decide to axe the service.

Unfortunately, I feel that Stadia just fell into the "vicious circle" that it had to avoid at all costs; Google are pushing users to leave the service, with that kind of news... Users then begin to clearly see the Google graveyard pointing the tip of it's nose and just that brings it nearer to make it a reality.

As for the games... I have most of them on Steam and always bought games at huge discount, so no big deal. It was fun while it lasted.


Last edited by Mohandevir on 5 February 2022 at 9:09 pm UTC

And this is why I refuse to jump on the streaming bandwagon. I like stuff that I can actually own, either on physical media, or as a file that I can store locally and do with as I please. With streaming, it's far too easy for your content to suddenly become inaccessible without warning.

Cloud gaming makes as much sense as working full time in the metaverse with a headset on your face all day. It doesn't. Never has.

If you can afford a fast and stable internet connection then you can afford a console or medium end PC.

they also should give some assurance that you could access your games elsewhere in case they discontinue the service,

I'm not sure how would they go about this, they're not the usual desktop games that we can use. From people that had access to them we know that they can be (somewhat) easily modified to run on consumer hardware, but even so, that implies some extra serious work for the whole library, from a company that might not be able to bleed extrafunds at that point.
Or, maybe they just have rights to the Windows version of the respective games and make those available for download? IDK.

I just hope they will permit Stadia controllers to be paired via Bluetooth, when they decide to axe the service.

That was my hope, too, when I bought one of their controllers at that insanely cheap price near the end of last year.

I own one game on Stadia (that I got for free) and tried it free for a month. The experience is smoother than that of GFN, but because GFN incorporates my existing libraries of games (and I got in when the service price was only $25/6 months), it was a no-brainer which service for me to choose.

Cloud gaming makes as much sense as working full time in the metaverse with a headset on your face all day. It doesn't. Never has.

If you can afford a fast and stable internet connection then you can afford a console or medium end PC.

Your logic doesn't track. The minimum Stadia requirements are 10 Mbps. There are people who can afford that who definitely can't afford a gaming PC and maybe not even a console.

Cloud gaming also offers the ability to play on mobile devices, so even people who have a PC or console but are travelling would be able to to play.

Despite all the disadvantages, we need giants like Google to support Linux and games.

My problem with Stadia is that seems to be stagnating and some later games are having (at launch at least) some performance issues. Games usually run excellent on Stadia, but a couple of these screwups can totally ruin the perception. Control for example even now runs like crap, and is a big title that people will go for. It looks like their hardware hasn't been updated in a while, and what was good HW few years ago is now already obsolete. They're not doing much also in terms of expanding the service (and its quality) to other countries. GFN somehow managed to open new centers in East-Europe, dramatically decreasing the latency. Google did not, and this is mind boggling considering who they are.

But this opens up another question when you have centralized hardware repositories what happens in another pandemic with unreliable shipping, component / mineral shortages spiraling hardware costs for those actual companies when you are still running Vega hardware and 10 million new people want to play Dying Light 2 at 4k 60fps !? And You can't even get the right workers into the data centers to swap the hardware.

Or another potential serious situation where people have limited (but just enough to buy groceries or look at email / log into steam to keep the 90 timer going ) internet access like a cyber pandemic or even power grid issue which again might limit power to just a few hours a day.. still workable and you can live with managed expectations.. but gaming is going to completely impossible in the future with any of the above.

Does anyone remember Onlive ? That was what i thought cloud gaming was going to be, even back then there was this cool wall of animated games that were captures of live action and you click on a tile and were almost immediately transported into a game .. these days with NVME's hitting 6000MBPS it's not so impressive when your own PC is loading faster than Googles data center loading your games (that you still have access to in any of the above situations)

with faster internet comes faster downloading .. its a weird race that only makes sense to most people if games keep getting bigger but even though some titles are, many of the best titles now are actually indie games that are under 20gb sometimes much less. ohh and mobile hardware is closer to delivering PC like visuals every year as far as the screen size is concerned and those games are not nearly as big as mega AAA titles.

Yea cloud streaming probably is the future at some point but im fairly glad that for now it's not.

they also should give some assurance that you could access your games elsewhere in case they discontinue the service,

I'm not sure how would they go about this, they're not the usual desktop games that we can use. From people that had access to them we know that they can be (somewhat) easily modified to run on consumer hardware, but even so, that implies some extra serious work for the whole library, from a company that might not be able to bleed extrafunds at that point.
Or, maybe they just have rights to the Windows version of the respective games and make those available for download? IDK.

at least for multiplatform games that are already avaliable for windows, it should be feasible

Especially Stadia Pro, buy games individually AND pay monthly?

buy games individually OR pay monthly

I don't think you really buy games on stadia, closest to really buying a game these days is GOG with their offline installer