After years of technical debt, Discord has announced a big change is coming to their username system to make it easier to find the people you want to connect with.
Currently, you have your username followed by a bunch of numbers. It's not an ideal system, as they said themselves, "our current usernames can often be too complicated or obscure for people to remember and share easily". So they're changing it to be a bit more like Twitter and other platforms where you have @username instead. You'll still be able to change your display name to whatever you want though.
This is a good time to tell you to join the GamingOnLinux Discord right?
When the change comes in, your username will need to be unique and they said it will roll-out over the coming weeks. You'll get an in-app notification when your time comes to do the change-over. It will take several months for them to get through everyone, so you might be in for a bit of a wait on it.
It will be interesting to see how this system is received. It can easily end up with the same problems other places have, with people impersonating others by nabbing their tag used on another platform. Discord will need to be careful on this, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see them eventually roll out their own verification system too due to this.
What are your thoughts?
Cleaner usernames will be good, however, although there will likely be some people not getting the name they want. This change won't please everyone, for sure.
I just hope 'in app notification' will also work if you only access it via browser?
Display wise, they can do what Battle.net does and only display the first portion of your username until you hover your mouse to reveal the appended numbers. In addition, they can copy what Steam does and allow people to assign nicknames to their friends list.
I don't really use Discord these days (will probably check out the GOL channel soon), but I do deal with large corporate changes. In my experience, people like to have timing of migration in their own control. You need to create a reason for them to want to prioritize it, but avoid hard deadlines if you can.
If Discord cannot support the existing name format and a new format at the time same, then they failed the engineering challenge. Where did all those experts go during Covid? Amazon? The talent pool is turning into a vacuum. I digress.
tags will be taken, all server rooms permissions will need to be (manually) re-applied and you are not going to know who is who for quite some time...
Last edited by Kimyrielle on 5 May 2023 at 4:52 pm UTC
Am I the only one actually liking the #1234 system?
Nope, I much prefer it, not to mention how this is going to cause a lot of username squatting and selling. There's a big pushback against this change on places like the Fediverse and Tumblr (1) (2).
Plus, they seem to be working on a (rancid) re-design of the mobile app.
All while still making it against ToS to fix the issue yourself, by making your own client or modifying the proprietary client.
I hope Revolt gains some traction when it's more developed, open and optional self-hosting, while being more approachable than XMPP and Matrix for the less tech-savvy
The results of this could be . . . discordant.If a certain Cupertino company got involved we could have quite an Apple of Discord on our hands!
I'm only in Discord for some games, which i like.
I'm sorry, but this is just silly
I could understand if they expanded the Nitro benefit to being able to have the "@name" handle without needing to use #1234, but still enabling the "@name#1234" system for new users and plebs. It makes economic sense. But changing the whole system? What's the point? The current system works.
I'd rather see a less casual spin of Discord. Make it paid, or whatever, I like Discord's backend, I just want something that is actually more oriented towards work and non-casual interaction, like Skype or whatever.
I much prefer the current system, having the numeric ID is so much nicer than just sticking numbers into your name. I'm not looking forward to this change at all, and it's not something they're likely to back out of now. Discord had been good for so long... how much longer before it is worth looking for an alternative instead?Hmmm . . . wonder if they're big enough to reach the stage Cory Doctorow calls "enshittification"?
The results of this could be . . . discordant.If a certain Cupertino company got involved we could have quite an Apple of Discord on our hands!
Pure gold. Hail Eris.
Well, i don't use ICQ anymore (I deleted my account years ago) but i still know my number as it would be my telephone...I haven't heard anyone mention ICQ in ages. I had a few good friends from my UT99 days on there that I lost contact with because I forgot my login details and couldn't retrieve them.
I'm only in Discord for some games, which i like.
Well, i don't use ICQ anymore (I deleted my account years ago) but i still know my number as it would be my telephone...I haven't heard anyone mention ICQ in ages. I had a few good friends from my UT99 days on there that I lost contact with because I forgot my login details and couldn't retrieve them.
I'm only in Discord for some games, which i like.
Amazingly, it's still going, being bought by mail.ru in 2010 after AOL's buyout a few years prior. Sadly, mail.ru (now known as VK) is Russian owned and made headlines by cooperating with Russian authorities to grant access to conversations - something not possible with end-to-end encrypted services like Signal, or Whatsapp. Even Telegram, which isn't end-to-end encrypted, refuses (mostly) to grant access to authorities. So I wouldn't be chasing those credentials any time soon!
See more from me