Unity has announced that President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors - John Riccitiello, is leaving "effective immediately". This follows on from the ridiculous pricing changes Unity tried recently, with the press release making no mention of it at all.
Riccitiello is no stranger to controversy who said some developers were "some of the biggest fucking idiots" in an interview with Pocket Gamer. Riccitiello was also EA CEO when they first launched loot boxes in FIFA 09, and even went as far as suggesting gamers would pay to reload their weapons in games like Battlefield. No doubt many will be happy to see Riccitiello leave. From the press release:
“It’s been a privilege to lead Unity for nearly a decade and serve our employees, customers, developers and partners, all of whom have been instrumental to the Company’s growth,” Mr. Riccitiello said. “I look forward to supporting Unity through this transition and following the Company’s future success.”
Perhaps under new leadership, Unity can begin to fix up their image.
James M. Whitehurst has been appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the Board while the search process begins to find a new permanent CEO. Whitehurst was previously CEO at Red Hat and later President at IBM. Statement from the press release:
“I am honored to join Unity as Interim CEO and President at this important time in its evolution,” Mr. Whitehurst said. “With the Company’s experienced leadership and passionate employees, I am confident that Unity is well-positioned to continue enhancing its platform, strengthening its community of customers, developers and partners, and focusing on its growth and profitability goals. I look forward to working closely with the Board and our talented global team to execute on our strategy, and I anticipate a seamless transition.”
Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
The comments on this article are closed.
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
That's fair.I agree with everything else you said, but economics is political. That's why large corporations, purely "economic" entities, spend so much money lobbying/bribing/etc politicians. Politics is about people having different interests and deciding whose interests will be served how hard--and economics is a really big factor in whose interests get served.It has gotten very tiring for all the comments to be about politics here, so I'm glad to see this comment that does not make me feel defensive for the place I was born.First of all, I think this is economics, not politics.
1 Likes, Who?
Mountain Man Oct 16, 2023
The problem is not capitalism, it's human nature.
1 Likes, Who?
The problem is not capitalism, it's human nature.Meh. It's like the nature/nurture debate--the two both operate. Human nature exists, kinda, but societies are not all the same and how human nature is expressed is different depending on the social environment. Even within the broad system of capitalism, the broad umbrella of "the West", and the narrow confines of the present day, Finns seem to act quite different from Americans in how they approach economic life, despite both being human and presumably heir to the same "human nature".
Really, IMO invoking human nature is a bit of a dodge. It means nobody has to be responsible for anything and nobody ever has to try, because if anything is shitty, well, that's just inevitable because human nature. That's not how trade unionists won the weekend.
Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 16 October 2023 at 3:28 am UTC
1 Likes, Who?
I'd say the problem here is specifically how a corporation is incentivized to behave in a typical capitalist economy. It would be naive to blame each ghoul of a corporate CEO individually while ignoring the underlying reasons for their ghoulish actions.
I'm not much of a revolutionary. The solution isn't likely to be that we simply scrap the system and try something else. It would be more logical to honestly acknowledge these problems and take steps to remedy the worst of them using controls and methods that have been shown to work. Active (and adaptive) regulation and mixed ownership models come to mind as examples.
I'm not much of a revolutionary. The solution isn't likely to be that we simply scrap the system and try something else. It would be more logical to honestly acknowledge these problems and take steps to remedy the worst of them using controls and methods that have been shown to work. Active (and adaptive) regulation and mixed ownership models come to mind as examples.
1 Likes, Who?
Mountain Man Oct 17, 2023
The problem is not capitalism, it's human nature.Meh. It's like the nature/nurture debate--the two both operate. Human nature exists, kinda, but societies are not all the same and how human nature is expressed is different depending on the social environment. Even within the broad system of capitalism, the broad umbrella of "the West", and the narrow confines of the present day, Finns seem to act quite different from Americans in how they approach economic life, despite both being human and presumably heir to the same "human nature".
Really, IMO invoking human nature is a bit of a dodge. It means nobody has to be responsible for anything and nobody ever has to try, because if anything is shitty, well, that's just inevitable because human nature. That's not how trade unionists won the weekend.
It's not a dodge at all. It's simply pointing out the fact that every economic system is vulnerable to the same greed and deceit that people often mistake for the "evils of capitalism".
0 Likes
Yeah, but that isn't actually true. Different systems are vulnerable to different things. Not that greed goes away, exactly, but feudalism's problems generally involved destructive wars and dynastic squabbles--political ambitions of the warrior class that ran things. Merchants could be greedy . . . and nobles could take their stuff if they got uppity. Craftspeople could be greedy . . . but their guilds regulated them and their greed could only operate on a very small scale anyway. Sure, there was greed, but it wasn't a huge driver of behaviour or political events. The other big problem with feudalism was its decentralization made it hard to do big things, like create infrastructure or mount big national armed forces; also not related to greed.The problem is not capitalism, it's human nature.Meh. It's like the nature/nurture debate--the two both operate. Human nature exists, kinda, but societies are not all the same and how human nature is expressed is different depending on the social environment. Even within the broad system of capitalism, the broad umbrella of "the West", and the narrow confines of the present day, Finns seem to act quite different from Americans in how they approach economic life, despite both being human and presumably heir to the same "human nature".
Really, IMO invoking human nature is a bit of a dodge. It means nobody has to be responsible for anything and nobody ever has to try, because if anything is shitty, well, that's just inevitable because human nature. That's not how trade unionists won the weekend.
It's not a dodge at all. It's simply pointing out the fact that every economic system is vulnerable to the same greed and deceit that people often mistake for the "evils of capitalism".
Theocracies as far as I can tell tend to be all about dogma and schisms and sort of McCarthyist witch hunts and brutal enforcement of tradition. There's surely some greed happening, but what they're vulnerable to is conformity gone wild.
A lot of people imagine that other economic systems were just capitalism with different clothes on, but they weren't.
Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 17 October 2023 at 1:55 am UTC
1 Likes, Who?
OK, next time someone looks at me funny, I'm blaming capitalism. And when I do, I expect a grave nod from you in agreement, maybe a "dag nabbit" and knee slap to go with it.It feels like every reaction to something bad these days is blamed on capitalism.What do you want people to blame it on? Feudalism? Capitalism is what we have (until the revolution comes); it's like farmers blaming everything on the weather--of course they do, and of course it's true.
0 Likes
No, but it could stay focused on the topical subjects of Unity and the CEO. When the blame so quickly jumps to a giant systemic thing, it becomes a bit fruitless. The vision is too big to take any kind of action, so it is just complaining because it's fun to complain. Like when someone says, "Ah man, it's Monday!" OK, great. Please don't say that to me every week! That would be tiring. Make sense?It has gotten very tiring for all the comments to be about politics here, so I'm glad to see this comment that does not make me feel defensive for the place I was born.To be less sarcastic: What do you expect comments on an article like this to be about? Something completely unrelated?
0 Likes
No, but it could stay focused on the topical subjects of Unity and the CEO. When the blame so quickly jumps to a giant systemic thing, it becomes a bit fruitless. The vision is too big to take any kind of action, so it is just complaining because it's fun to complain. Like when someone says, "Ah man, it's Monday!" OK, great. Please don't say that to me every week! That would be tiring. Make sense?
How do you think such giant systemic things have changed in the past? Without talking? Or do you believe we're at the end of history, things are not going to change anymore?
There's also little things people can do around the corner: repair cafés, local currencies, cooperatives, ... These are not going to end capitalism of course, but they're making people a bit less dependent.
Last edited by Eike on 21 October 2023 at 4:20 pm UTC
1 Likes, Who?
Cute. Specious, but cute.OK, next time someone looks at me funny, I'm blaming capitalism. And when I do, I expect a grave nod from you in agreement, maybe a "dag nabbit" and knee slap to go with it.It feels like every reaction to something bad these days is blamed on capitalism.What do you want people to blame it on? Feudalism? Capitalism is what we have (until the revolution comes
Of course, if the someone looks at you funny because you look like you might be gay or trans, then they probably did it because of a social media network funded by the remaining Koch brother and various similar people, who funded the network in hopes of gaining shock troops for fascism who would help them avoid constraints on their ability to keep heating the planet for profit . . . so, yes, still capitalism, I nod gravely.
2 Likes, Who?
Patreon
PayPal
See more from me