Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

While most people will be using a normal package for Steam on Linux or the Flatpak, Canonical continue pushing their own Snap packages and one that's needed a lot of work is Steam. Giving an overview on some of the work done Canonical's Ashton N wrote a post on the official Discourse Forum to go over some of it.

Since Snap packages aren't like normal packages, like Flatpak they run in a more contained environment which places various limits on what they can do. The idea is to keep your main filesystem safe and untouched but that comes with many problems that need special solutions.

For the Steam Snap, Canonical had to ensure things like Proton would work properly and they say they've "made huge strides in improving the Snap's compatibility in this respect" including allowing external drive mounts, improved NVIDIA driver support, network compatibility, /usr files, and /lib/libexec files. If you have games on other drives this is now supported across /mnt, /media, /run/media, /opt, /src or /home so pretty much anywhere you set up a Steam Library should now work!

The popular MangoHUD is now bundled directly with the Steam Snap too, so you can easily use mangohud %command% as a launch option on games to get it. GameMode from Feral Interactive has also been bundled too so you can use gamemoderun %command% just like above which required changes to GameMode itself which has been merged into the project.

Lots more work was done like a significant improvement to controller support, debugging tools and various smaller issues being solved.

Eventually it should work just like the normal Steam package, but have everything it needs in one Snap package that would run across various versions of Ubuntu (and other distros) while having better security for the host system.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc, Steam, Ubuntu
12 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
10 comments

hardpenguin Nov 1, 2023
QuoteCanonical continue pushing their own Snap packages
Brokatt Nov 1, 2023
View PC info
  • Supporter
Looks great but I would like an update on mesa-git that was said to be bundled before I switch to the snap. Is it there? Is it working?
dziadulewicz Nov 1, 2023
Steam snap has always worked great for me and i prefer it in confinement means over the flatpak version.

This improvement makes it even better (from Ubuntu forum):

"Many gamers store their games on external drives, so it was an important issue to us to get external libraries up to par with the Steam deb. Now, any game libraries located in /mnt, /media/, or /run/media, /opt, /src, or /home can be used in the Steam Snap with no issues."

Great!
CatKiller Nov 1, 2023
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: BrokattLooks great but I would like an update on mesa-git that was said to be bundled before I switch to the snap. Is it there? Is it working?

QuoteIf you're using the edge channel of Steam, the Snap relies on the gaming-graphics-core22 Snap for graphics packages (see snap connections steam). You may switch gaming-graphics-core22 to a different channel to use different versions of mesa and other graphics libraries.

Currently, the channels are oibaf-latest (bleeding edge), kisak-fresh (new, but stable), and kisak-turtle (most stable). Switch between them with the following:

snap refresh gaming-graphics-core22 --channel <channel>
https://github.com/canonical/steam-snap/wiki/FAQ#how-do-i-use-a-different-mesagraphics-version
ElectricPrism Nov 1, 2023
Imagine (being Canonical and) having Valve in the bag, (which could have greatly strengthened their position) only to destroy their functional relationship when they dropped 32-bit libraries, and then later to trying to backup and try to win some points by bundling their store inside your cancer package system that nobody wants to uses outside your walled/gated garden.

This is peak Irony. Mount Ironicus. It's actually so bad, it's so good -- somebody should write a comedy book about Canonical, except instead of jokes it's just the history of the things that they have done the last decade. It would be a comedy gold thriller hands down.
motang Nov 2, 2023
Need to try this out again. I wasn't too happy when I tried a couple of months ago with the way streaming worked via Steam Link, but looks like things might have changed.
Adutchman Nov 2, 2023
That's interesting. If only there were another packaging systen that also isolated packages that was actively backed by Valve and literally everyone besides Canonical /s.
Brokatt Nov 2, 2023
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: ElectricPrismImagine (being Canonical and) having Valve in the bag, (which could have greatly strengthened their position) only to destroy their functional relationship when they dropped 32-bit libraries, and then later to trying to backup and try to win some points by bundling their store inside your cancer package system that nobody wants to uses outside your walled/gated garden.

This is peak Irony. Mount Ironicus. It's actually so bad, it's so good -- somebody should write a comedy book about Canonical, except instead of jokes it's just the history of the things that they have done the last decade. It would be a comedy gold thriller hands down.

That's a very skewed view but you are entitled to it. While I agree that Canonical could have handled the situation MUCH better, the fact is Ubuntu is still the recommended OS by Steam 4 years later and Ubuntu is still among the most popular distros for Steam users.

I do find it hilarious that you talk about snaps as "cancer package system that nobody wants to use". Like you actually think package systems is something most users care about. I dare you to find a normal Windows user that is trying Linux out and tell them about the differences between snap, flatpak, appimage, deb, etc. without them falling asleep. I cannot stress how little I care about package systems. I cared nothing for package systems when I used Windows nor Mac, and that has not changed when I switched to Linux. Snap, Flatpak, Appimage, deb - I don't care what I use as long as it works and I have minimal issues. I do realize this is a very unpopular opinion in the community but I firmly believe to be in the majority on this one.

I do apologize in advance for any offense I may have caused.
twinsonian Nov 2, 2023
I don't think it matters which line you fall on, like or dislike snaps -- ultimately this is good news as a whole. Improvements to these solutions is always welcome and a good thing for those that use them and snap and flatpak competing with eachother is just a win for the rest of the community. Competition breeds quality and innovation.
I probably won't use snaps for the foreseeable future because they don't support symlinks. Using a setup where your home directory passwd entry is a symlink shouldn't be a controversial configuration but it's not supported by snaps and breaks them. You can use bind mounts as a workaround but that's not as elegant as a symlink and flatpak has no problem with symlinks.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register


Or login with...
Sign in with Steam Sign in with Google
Social logins require cookies to stay logged in.