63 Days is a new action strategy game coming from developer Destructive Creations who previously made War Mongrels and Ancestors Legacy. 63 Days is about brotherhood and the fight to regain independence against overwhelming odds in the 1944 occupied Warsaw, Poland.
They announced the game earlier this month, and over email they mentioned to me "We're working hard to optimize the game for Steamdeck. That means we're improving things like text scaling, controller support, and overall performance." which is great to see!
It’s an isometric real-time tactics game that follows in the footsteps of Destructive Creations' previous release, War Mongrels, building upon its gameplay mechanics. Ready for those of you looking to scratch that tactical itch playing a proven formula with quality graphics, fresh gameplay elements, and music produced by the legendary Adam Skorupa.
![YouTube Thumbnail](https://www.gamingonlinux.com/cache/youtube_thumbs/bd845cc779ff3eea10d9d07da48bd89b.jpg)
Direct Link
You can follow it on Steam. It's planned to release later this year. Looks good!
Quoting: LanzI have brought out the arm chair philosophers.Says a guy drive-by citing Socrates, Plato, Hegel, Gnosticism and on and on. Whatever.
Quoting: LanzMarx is talking about seizing the means of production of man via seizing the means of production of culture. Culture makes man and man makes culture, and the snake eats its own tail. Marxism is in fact just the most currently relevant gnostic religion. It's a theosophy, not a philosophy. To understand this, read Socrates and Plato, then the Torah (particularly Genesis with its warning against gnosis), then the Corpus Hermeticum, then Hegel, then Marx, and then keep going to Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse, Angela Davis, Gale Rubin, and Kimberle Crenshaw. Starting with Plato in contrast to Socrates position of forms of knowledge, everything afterward except Genesis is gnostic.Wow, that's all amazingly pretentious. And incredibly wrong. To squash all that stuff together like that takes a stubborn refusal to grapple with the specifics of what any of them are actually talking about.
Quoting: Purple Library GuyQuoting: LanzI have brought out the arm chair philosophers.Says a guy drive-by citing Socrates, Plato, Hegel, Gnosticism and on and on. Whatever.
Quoting: LanzMarx is talking about seizing the means of production of man via seizing the means of production of culture. Culture makes man and man makes culture, and the snake eats its own tail. Marxism is in fact just the most currently relevant gnostic religion. It's a theosophy, not a philosophy. To understand this, read Socrates and Plato, then the Torah (particularly Genesis with its warning against gnosis), then the Corpus Hermeticum, then Hegel, then Marx, and then keep going to Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse, Angela Davis, Gale Rubin, and Kimberle Crenshaw. Starting with Plato in contrast to Socrates position of forms of knowledge, everything afterward except Genesis is gnostic.Wow, that's all amazingly pretentious. And incredibly wrong. To squash all that stuff together like that takes a stubborn refusal to grapple with the specifics of what any of them are actually talking about.
I can already tell that you're dug in on the issue and there's no point in trying to change your mind. You're being deliberately obtuse and trying to confuse the lineage, likely because you know what I've said is true, but you believe in the ideology nonetheless. Ideology is nothing more than secular religion. It's time for you to be agnostic. I don't have any interest in debating someone who does not want to understand.
See more from me