Check out our Monthly Survey Page to see what our users are running.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

As if things couldn't get any worse, now EA are looking at ways of putting adverts in video games to squeeze every possible penny from you.

We have mass layoffs with CEOs taking no responsibility, AI being shoved in our faces everywhere possible to eventually replace everyone and now real-world adverts inside our video games too? When will this AAA enshittification of gaming end? Never, obviously. CEOs and their shareholders will never stop chasing every possible extra penny. Growth for growths sake and it simply must continue. Consume consumers!

Writing in their latest Earnings Call, Andrew Wilson - Electronic Arts Inc. - Chairman & CEO said:

"To answer your question on advertising broadly, again, I think it's still early on that front. And we have looked over the course of our history to be very thoughtful about advertising in the context of our play experiences. But again, as we think about the many, many billions of hours spent, both playing, creating, watching and connecting and where much of that engagement happens to be on the bounds of a traditional game experience, our expectation is that advertising has an opportunity to be a meaningful driver of growth for us."

Wilson continues:

"We'll be very thoughtful as we move into that, but we have teams internally in the company right now looking at how do we do very thoughtful implementations inside of our game experiences. But more importantly, as we start to build community and harness the power of community beyond the bounds of our games, how do we think about advertising as a growth driver in those types of experiences?"

This only makes me think of that scene in Ready Player One, where they talk about selling up to 80% of your vision for adverts.

Pictured - Ready Player One, Warner Bros. Pictures

Also mentioned in the report is that Apex Legends continues to do well as it "grew 29 points over the last fiscal year" and as for Battlefield? A new one is on the way that "is going to be another tremendous live service". That's…certainly a way to describe an upcoming game.

For Linux and Steam Deck fans, EA are not exactly doing great. Their continued push for their home-grown EA anticheat has been causing problems because it's not supported at all. At least for now Apex Legends is safe with EAC which was just updated.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
11 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
47 comments
Page: 1/3»
  Go to:

dpanter May 13
EA desperate to surpass Ubisoft as the worst gaming company in history because why wouldn't you want to be number 1 on any list. Got a long way to go still but the gap is narrowing. Yay us.
grigi May 13
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
They may be "thoughtful" at first, but for sure isn't when it becomes accepted.

I've recently been playing Cyberpunk, and what struck me is how they shove adverts everywhere (it's part of the game world, so it's on purpose). It also upsets the in-game npc's sometimes.
Interesting that if you go to the wealthiest suburb alone, there are significantly less adds there,
Also very little ads if you go to dead towns/pacifica.

Like they know that you don't annoy the political powerful, and it's not worth it to sell to an audience that is either too poor or rebellious to buy.

It's a very sad commentary as to where we are going with the ensh***ification of things.
Belaptir May 13
Can't wait to keep avoiding this company as a whole!
based May 13
Isn't this old news? Or wrong company
Ehvis May 13
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
It's very simple to me. Ads are not compatible with paying. But in this case it's EA, so nothing is lost in the first place.
3lfk1ng May 13
Super Simple Solution:

Open Steam.
Select the Store.
Search for Electronic Arts.
Click on the "Gear" icon
Select "Ignore this Publisher"
Liam Dawe May 13
Isn't this old news? Or wrong company
No, it's very clearly their 2024 report. They did briefly try something in the past, but they're once again looking at it and as quoted, have people working on it.
IvoLimmen May 13
You forgot a very relevant part of the Ready Player One reference: selling up to 80% of your vision for adverts before seizures set in
Nagezahn May 13
Super Simple Solution:

Open Steam.
Select the Store.
Search for Electronic Arts.
Click on the "Gear" icon
Select "Ignore this Publisher"

Thanks, didn't know it was possible to ignore a whole publisher.
pb May 13
I don't like the idea itself, but to be the devil's advocate: it *can* be done right. Like Lucozade in Superfrog (the original release) or even whole sponsored games such as Cool Spot (7up), Zool (Chupa Chups) and Global Gladiators (McDonald's). So basically, product placement in games. I don't think people would necessarily mind that. Maaaaybe well-blended-in billboards (although SCS wanted to do that in Euro/American Truck Sims and there was a lot of backlash). But commercial breaks? No way. It shall not pass.


Last edited by pb on 13 May 2024 at 11:16 am UTC
pb May 13
I've recently been playing Cyberpunk, and what struck me is how they shove adverts everywhere (it's part of the game world, so it's on purpose). It also upsets the in-game npc's sometimes.
Interesting that if you go to the wealthiest suburb alone, there are significantly less adds there,
Also very little ads if you go to dead towns/pacifica.

TBH Cyberpunk was one of the first games that came to my mind. I wonder how people would react if some of these ads/billboards were actually advertising real-life products. Of course keeping within the mood, not Skittles or Always. There are many Cyberpunk-franchised products in the shops (I've seen energy drinks for example), maybe they could be advertised in-game too and blend well? (Sorry for giving them ideas :D but I'm genuinely curious).


Last edited by pb on 13 May 2024 at 11:29 am UTC
based May 13
They did briefly try something in the past

That has to be it, didn't Ubisoft and/or 2k look into this as well?
Liam Dawe May 13
They did briefly try something in the past

That has to be it, didn't Ubisoft and/or 2k look into this as well?
Many pubs have tried to do so yes.
robvv May 13
The Zool series from the early 1990s was sponsored by Chupa Chups. The branding was made very obvious when you purchased the game, so it wasn't intrusive or irritating. What EA are suggesting is not on, however.
robvv May 13
Many pubs have tried to do so yes.

"Before you down this pint of ale, here's a word from our sponsor!"
LoudTechie May 13
I've recently been playing Cyberpunk, and what struck me is how they shove adverts everywhere (it's part of the game world, so it's on purpose). It also upsets the in-game npc's sometimes.
Interesting that if you go to the wealthiest suburb alone, there are significantly less adds there,
Also very little ads if you go to dead towns/pacifica.

TBH Cyberpunk was one of the first games that came to my mind. I wonder how people would react if some of these ads/billboards were actually advertising real-life products. Of course keeping within the mood, not Skittles or Always. There are many Cyberpunk-franchised products in the shops (I've seen energy drinks for example), maybe they could be advertised in-game too and blend well? (Sorry for giving them ideas :D bu I'm genuinely curious).


Ooh, how would you do that with performance metrics and would it stand up in advert distinquishability regulation.
Making the billboard clickable is probably the preferred option, but hard.
The distinquishability problem could probably be fixed with a warning at the start of the game.
Talon1024 May 13
The Seven Deadly Sinners of the Game Industry

Greed: EA
Wrath: Nintendo
Sloth: Bethesda
Pride/Hubris: Rockstar Games
Lust: Epic Games
Gluttony: Microsoft
Envy: ???


Last edited by Talon1024 on 13 May 2024 at 11:29 am UTC
Pengling May 13
There is a really simple solution to this: Do not buy it. Do not. DO NOT.

Support smaller games and indie titles that respect your time and money, instead - you can get a lot more of them for the price that EA asks for a single release.

Sincerely: Someone whose favourite series would be in a better spot if people did the above.

I don't like the idea itself, but to be the devil's advocate: it *can* be done right. Like Lucozade in Superfrog (the original release) or even whole sponsored games such as Cool Spot (7up), Zool (Chupa Chups) and Global Gladiators (McDonald's). So basically, product placement in games. I don't think people would necessarily mind that. Maaaaybe well-blended-in billboards (although SCS wanted to do that in Euro/American Truck Sims and there was a lot of backlash). But commercial breaks? No way. It shall not pass.
The Zool series from the early 1990s was sponsored by Chupa Chups. The branding was made very obvious when you purchased the game, so it wasn't intrusive or irritating. What EA are suggesting is not on, however.
I just played McDonald's Treasure Land Adventure (Mega Drive, via RetroDECK) this past weekend, and it's another example from this old-style pool of "advergames" - it was up-front about the product-placement, it respected the fact that the license is well-liked, and it was a good and complete game. I highly recommend it if you're after a short-but-sweet 16-bit platformer that you might've missed back in the day.

However, we all know from EA's previous experiments with in-game advertising, and from their track-record in general over the last 15 to 20 years, that this isn't what they're aiming for - look up that old boxing-game of theirs where they literally flashed full-screen ads in your face during gameplay, that'll be more like it. Presumably also with an option to pay EVEN MORE to stop the ads from locking up your character during gameplay.
elmapul May 13
honestly i dont think this is so bad depending on how its done.
its a completely different thing to interrupt the gameplay of an game to show an ad, and use the ingame scenario to put ads on, lets say, billboards.

the second case would just feel natural, i mean there are tons of ads on futebol billboards, and in some cities like newyork.

if they replaced one of the forms of monetization, like less dlcs, cheaper prices on the main game, or stuff like that and put ads to compensate that wouldnt be that bad.

comment sponsored by raid shadow legends.


Spoiler, click me
but no, they are greedy so they will put ads on top of everything else.
Ehvis May 13
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
The Seven Deadly Sinners of the Game Industry

Greed: EA
Wrath: Nintendo
Sloth: Bethesda
Pride/Hubris: Rockstar Games
Lust: Epic Games
Gluttony: Microsoft
Envy: ???

Warner Bros Games would be envy I'd say. In particular their envy towards live service.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register