Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Only a few months after Steam first hit 36 million, the record has been broken again this year with Steam remaining the champion for PC gamers.

According to SteamDB, yesterday saw 37,266,324 concurrent users online with 12,534,703 actually in-game. Looking back through the history that makes it the 4th time this year that the record has been broken. We saw Steam hit 34, 35 and then 36 million all in a single month back in March so it took a bit longer this time.

Around the time Steam hit the new record the top games were:

  • Black Myth: Wukong
  • Counter-Strike 2
  • Dota 2
  • PUBG
  • Banana

It's pretty clear that Black Myth: Wukong is really pushing the numbers there, itself hitting a peak concurrent player count of 2,068,291 in the last 24 hours and an all-time peak of 2,415,714 only 4 days ago. So it's doing really well, and has managed to become the second most-played game on Steam of all time just under PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS as per SteamDB.

Five years ago, Randy Pitchford of Gearbox predicted in a post on X/Twitter, that Steam "may look like a dying store":

From a track record point of view, my expectation is that Epic’s investment in technology will outpace Valve’s substantially. When we look back at Steam in five or ten years, it may look like a dying store and other, competitive stores, will be the place to be. The competitive store that happens to be the leader in 10 years may not be Epic’s store, but it probably won’t be Valve’s and Epic’s moves right now are opening the door and paving the way for a vibrant competitive economy.

I think it's pretty safe to say that's not going to happen.

Worth noting Pitchford did follow that post up recently when poked about Borderlands 4 coming to Steam:

Yeah, Steam is the leading store for PC games and Epic is not pressing their advantage (which is a shame). I’m a Steam customer, but sure wish they had more and better competition that was more favorable to artists, designers, and creators than to the retailer. I will continue to support competitors to Steam and also support Steam.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc, Steam
8 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
7 comments

MacTavish Aug 26
Although I like Epic, Valve are the only ones to care about gaming on Linux, so for me the choice is pretty obvious
Phlebiac Aug 27
Quoting: MacTavishAlthough I like Epic

May I ask what you like? It seems an unpopular opinion, but I'm open to your thoughts.
Adutchman Aug 27
I agree with the last tweet. If you look at Steam from a UX/UI standpoint, it's pretty bad because the core UI has not evolved significantly in years. And there's also the percentage question of course. If Epic would've put money into improving the actual store and Linjx support, they might have won me over. Shame really.
Brokatt Aug 27
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: AdutchmanI agree with the last tweet. If you look at Steam from a UX/UI standpoint, it's pretty bad because the core UI has not evolved significantly in years. And there's also the percentage question of course. If Epic would've put money into improving the actual store and Linjx support, they might have won me over. Shame really.

There is also ten times more features to fit in Steam compared to EGS. That's mainly the problem for competitors to Steam as I see it. How are they going to catch up? It's like an MMO trying to catch up to World of Warcraft. It's really, really hard and especially with Epics pace of innovation. It took EGS over three years to introduce the shopping cart; a revolutionary idea in 1995. Linux-support is pretty much at the bottom of the priority list xD No strike that it's not even on the list.


Last edited by Brokatt on 27 August 2024 at 6:56 am UTC
ToddL Aug 27
Awesome record for Steam and they continue to increase as time goes on because there's always more new games to come that'll push those numbers up.

As for Randy last X/Twitter post, if there were Steam competitors during its infancy, then they would've had some good competition. However, these competitors that we have today came in after Steam had already established themselves as the de facto place to buy your PC games digitally. At the end, competition is still great as long as Valve isn't killing/buying them off one by one.


Last edited by ToddL on 27 August 2024 at 2:12 pm UTC
Quoting: AdutchmanI agree with the last tweet. If you look at Steam from a UX/UI standpoint, it's pretty bad because the core UI has not evolved significantly in years.
Is there something inherently good about changing the core UI?
There are some things I'd like to see . . . for instance, it's basically a lot like a browser but it doesn't have tabs.
pete910 Aug 27
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: Phlebiac
Quoting: MacTavishAlthough I like Epic

May I ask what you like? It seems an unpopular opinion, but I'm open to your thoughts.

Because of how broken it is and what's lacking + the fact no linux native makes people appreciate Steam a whole lot more!
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register


Or login with...
Sign in with Steam Sign in with Google
Social logins require cookies to stay logged in.