Confused on Steam Play and Proton? Be sure to check out our guide.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Pocketpair, developers of Palworld, have put up a statement on the new lawsuit that has been filed against them from Nintendo and The Pokemon Company.

Here's the statement in full:

Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed against our company for patent infringement.

We have received notice of this lawsuit and will begin the appropriate legal proceedings and investigations into the claims of patent infringement.

At this moment, we are unaware of the specific patents we are accused of infringing upon, and we have not been notified of such details.

Pocketpair is a small indie game company based in Tokyo. Our goal as a company has always been to create fun games. We will continue to pursue this goal because we know that our games bring joy to millions of gamers around the world. Palworld was a surprise success this year, both for gamers and for us. We were blown away by the amazing response to the game and have been working hard to make it even better for our fans. We will continue improving Palworld and strive to create a game that our fans can be proud of.

It is truly unfortunate that we will be forced to allocate significant time to matters unrelated to game development due to this lawsuit. However, we will do our utmost for our fans, and to ensure that indie game developers are not hindered or discouraged from pursuing their creative ideas.

We apologize to our fans and supporters for any worry or discomfort that this news has caused.

As always, thank you for your continued support of Palworld and Pocketpair.


When it comes to what patent infringement Nintendo / Pokemon could be going after Pocketpair for, well, Nintendo actually have quite a number of patents that are for some very specific game mechanics. Which could be really problematic not just for Pocketpair, but all game developers looking to do anything similar.

Take for example this patent (approved in Japan, pending in the USA), that covers the feature of capturing creatures by throwing an object and sending out a character (like a Pokemon) to engage in combat.

Remember, this is not about copyright infringement, so they're not specifically going after any of the creature designs, but it's about the patents.

This is going to be a legal fight to remember. One perhaps for the history books.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc, Nintendo | Apps: Palworld
16 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
27 comments
Page: «2/3»
  Go to:

whizse Sep 20
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: tmtvlAnyway, my expectation is that Nintendo isn't going to take it all the way to court, they're probably aiming at an out-of-court settlement and if that doesn't happen they'll probably back off.
That sadly seems likely and is of course the classic strategy of patent trolls.
Seegras Sep 20
Of course, being a mechanic of a computer games makes this a) a pure software patent and thus not patentable in Europe and b) mathematics and this not patentable in Europe and the rest of the world. The Japan patent was granted illegally.

The patent mentioned above is the classic case of a "Moby Dick Support Device" https://seegras.discordia.ch/Blog/the-moby-dick-support-device/

On an unrelated note, "game mechanics" and -rules are explicitly not copyrightable.
melkemind Sep 20
View PC info
  • Supporter
Capturing a creature by throwing out an object wasn't invented by Pokemon. Humans have been doing that for thousands of years.
Patents have gotten kind of twisted since the old days. I mean, originally one of the conditions was, you show a working model. By those rules, show us a working pokeball or pound sand.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around why an entirely fictional idea should be a patentable kind of thing.
tohur Sep 20
Lets not Ignore the fact that the game Pokemon is inspired by and copied many of the OG Pokemon from and EVEN had a Ball throwing mechanic to catch the monsters existed many years before Pokemon.. If anyone should be suing anyone here should be Square Enix suing Nintendo because Square Enix owns the rights to said game. Japan should be ashamed for giving Nintendo a patent on something they did NOT originally come up with and the sus thing is this patent was granted to Nintendo after it was known Palworld was under development as trailers and such were already out


Last edited by tohur on 21 September 2024 at 5:19 am UTC
tohur Sep 21
Well Nintendo should fail this law suit.. has come to light today the patents they are suing Palworld over were filed in May 2024 and granted LAST month... there is NO way that can stand.


Last edited by tohur on 21 September 2024 at 5:20 am UTC
tpau Sep 21
There are many fans of Nintendo games that keep their favourite franchises alive and instead of hiring them and patting them on the shoulder for a job well done, Nintendo strikes them with a DCMA TakeDown request.
It is sad to see.
TheRiddick Sep 21
Quoting: tohurthere is NO way that can stand.

Perhaps their strategy is simply to bankrupt them in legal fees. Not to win.
Quoting: TheRiddick
Quoting: tohurthere is NO way that can stand.

Perhaps their strategy is simply to bankrupt them in legal fees. Not to win.
Wouldn't be the first time.
Or, to use the fact that a full trial would bankrupt the opponent with legal fees, to force concessions in a settlement.
Quoting: tohurWell Nintendo should fail this law suit.. has come to light today the patents they are suing Palworld over were filed in May 2024 and granted LAST month... there is NO way that can stand.
So . . . even the filing, after Palworld came out. Actually, I would figure the Palworld folks should be able to even avoid a huge expensive trial if that's all Nintendo have got . . . I mean, not an expert, but surely a motion to dismiss would have a pretty good chance.


Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 21 September 2024 at 8:30 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register


Or login with...
Sign in with Steam Sign in with Google
Social logins require cookies to stay logged in.