NVIDIA have announced some changes for the NVIDIA GeForce NOW game streaming service, so here's what you need to know. The service does work on Linux desktop and Steam Deck, and NVIDIA even released a Steam Deck install script, although last I checked NVIDIA were artificially limiting streams to 1080p on all Linux systems.
Firstly for people on the Priority plan (the first paid plan after Free): they're renaming it to Performance and giving it a bump up to 1440p from 1080p, with Ultrawide and support for saving graphics settings in certain games.
As for people on the Free plan NVIDIA say you will now "see they’re streaming from basic rigs, with varying specs that offer entry-level cloud gaming and are optimized for capacity".
Secondly, the big bit: they're going to cap subscribers to 100 hours of play time per month starting next year. They say this accounts for about "94% of their total members. 15 hours of unused playtime will automatically roll over to the next month, and you'll be able to buy 15 hours extra if you want ($2.99 Performance / $5.99 Ultimate).
Across a month with 30 days that would work out to a bit over 3 hours a day, every day.
If you're an existing active subscriber they will enable you to continue having unlimited playtime until January 2026, so you have until December 31st, 2024 to sign up and stay active to get that deal.
See more in their announcement.
Quoting: BlackBloodRumHonestly if you want to stream games just do it yourself with Sunshine or Steam Remote Play.Because not everyone has a full desktop PC capable of it, that's part of the whole point really.
Why pay someone else for something you can do yourself?
Quoting: Liam DaweQuoting: BlackBloodRumHonestly if you want to stream games just do it yourself with Sunshine or Steam Remote Play.Because not everyone has a full desktop PC capable of it, that's part of the whole point really.
Why pay someone else for something you can do yourself?
And, for my part, because I have an RX6600 on my host, my Steam Streaming is pretty garbage (lots of stuttering, input lags, slow downs and resolution artifacts with all of the mentionned solutions). GeForce Now is still the best solution, in my case.
My son is doing the same, on the same network, same cpu, but with a GTX 1660 Super and it's running much smoother.
It's not always a given that you'll have a good experience with Steam Link or Moonlight.
Last edited by Mohandevir on 7 November 2024 at 10:02 pm UTC
Quoting: BlackBloodRumWhy pay someone else for something you can do yourself?
Because I don't have a gaming PC that can play 4k or Ultrawide.
Steam Deck got me back into PC gaming and is my main device for that.
My Xbox Series X was my main device before Deck.
I can use Nvidia app built into my 4k TV to play games on the big screen in higher quality than my Deck can manage.
The biggest issue was that the experience wasn't all that streamlined in the end, there was a waiting to prepare environment and whatnot...
Quoting: BlackBloodRumWhy pay someone else for something you can do yourself?
To answer "why?", for me.
1) Doesn't require me to have a beefy GPU (hello sweet, sweet silence. Also, since this allows me to get away with NUCs I can have my computer VESA-mounted to the monitor, hello very clean desktop)
2) Works pretty great on a chromecast (gen4) (handy for a quick "grab the living rooom controller and sit in the sofa"-gaming, however, headset mics do not work on the chromecast, or at least didn't six months ago)
3) Works on pretty much any device with a browser (great when visiting friend)
4) DRM is now located on someone else's machines (drastically lowers security concerns)
4b) Some companies are willing to work with cloud providers but not with Linux (Fortnite being an example here).
5) Installs/Game sizes. There is something to be said for having a fresh game up and running in the time it takes you to grab snacks, not to mention not having to care about free space on disk.
6) Cost. Cloud Gaming costs about 120-150$ / year, an RTX
And yes, it works perfectly fine on a ca 2017 iGPU (NUC7i5), or at least did as of last night.
Same also holds true for boosteroid (I've used both quite a bit, I mainly prefer GeForce NOW, but boosteroid is my fallback when GeForce NOW isn't viable (RDR2 for example, or I guess post-Jan-2026 gaming))
* = Edits: seems "friendly" search swapped it for a 4070, *sighs*
Last edited by aluminumgriffin on 8 November 2024 at 9:31 am UTC
Quoting: TheRiddickI think Steam Deck 2 is going to upset a lot of these streaming services because it will be hopefully fast enough and good enough while also being a pretty decent price that most people can just use it, being portable solves the other reason these streaming services offer.
For my part, just a docking station where I can slap my own gpu on it and connect it to a Steam Deck 2 would end the debate.
Last edited by Mohandevir on 8 November 2024 at 12:44 pm UTC
Quoting: MohandevirI'm still on my founders subscription (30$CAN/6months) and not planning to move from that. Let's see what's in it for me, but 100 hours per month is more than enough, considering it's only a backup plan for my Steam Deck.I missed out on the Founders subscription back when it first started because I didn't play PC games that much at the time but I do have a subscription for Performance (fka Priority) now. I think the new changes makes sense because not everyone uses up the 6 hours provided by the Performance subscription and you can jump in and out for a couple of hours of game without going over 100 hours total for the month. What would disappoint me is if they ever cut the number of hours on your subscription like going from 6 (8 on Ultimate) to 3 (4 for Ultimate) hours.
Edit: It seems I get the performance plan for the price of my founders sub... So, for a little less than half the yearly bill of a regular sub. Nice!
Quoting: BlackBloodRumHonestly if you want to stream games just do it yourself with Sunshine or Steam Remote Play.For someone like myself that doesn't own a very powerful PC or want to build one from scratch, this is a convenient way for me to play some of my Steam games on a bunch of devices without doing the setup myself. I use it on my Steam Deck and Mac with great results.
Why pay someone else for something you can do yourself?
Quoting: MohandevirThis would be awesome if Steam Deck 2 provided a way to use eGPUs because that would give those AAA games some more juice to play at great framerates and graphics.Quoting: TheRiddickI think Steam Deck 2 is going to upset a lot of these streaming services because it will be hopefully fast enough and good enough while also being a pretty decent price that most people can just use it, being portable solves the other reason these streaming services offer.
For my part, just a docking station where I can slap my own gpu on it and connect it to a Steam Deck 2 would end the debate.
Last edited by ToddL on 8 November 2024 at 2:11 pm UTC
See more from me