Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Valve have another Steam store update incoming, with seemingly proper built-in support for a Season Pass along with new guidance for developers.

Initially spotted by SteamDB developer Pavel Djundik on Bluesky pointing out a new Steamworks page for Season Passes. Valve note on this page that Season Pass store pages will be listing all of the DLC included, along with their release dates. If developers aren't ready to clearly tell you when each DLC will be released then developers "shouldn't offer a Season Pass on Steam".

Valve said they will only offer Season Passes to developers "in a few rare cases with partners with which we have a well-established relationship and that have a proven track record on Steam".

The new guidelines include:

When a Season Pass is made available for purchase on Steam, it must include the following information:

  • A complete list of all DLC included in the Pass. (i.e. listing each of the four DLCs included in a Pass).
  • A basic description of the content that’s included in each DLC. For example, the first content release might be “The Glitterlands Expansion – New area to explore, two new weapons, and new enemies.” It’s not required for the DLC to have a final name at the launch of the Season Pass. The information about the content in the DLC doesn’t need to be detailed (simply “new weapons” or “two new weapons” is acceptable, they don’t have to list the exact weapons).
  • Expected release date for each DLC. Quarter and Year (i.e. January to March 2025) or Season/Year is acceptable. Of course, a date that’s more precise is also fine (i.e. June, 2025 or June 1st, 2025).


A Season Pass must include at least one released DLC when it is made available for purchase*
*with the exception of Season Passes included in a Pre-Purchase of a deluxe edition.

If developers need to delay an included DLC they get a one-time release date delay by up to three months. If they need longer, they need to contact Valve directly. However, if a DLC in a Season Pass is cancelled, gamers will be "offered a refund for the value of unreleased DLC".

Not a big surprise to see, since it's a much-used feature by plenty of bigger developers. Just like with Advanced Access being a thing, Valve continue moving with what developers are doing. By making it an actual dedicated feature, Valve can ensure some quality-control there for gamers by holding developers to account on repeated delays and cancellations.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc, Steam, Valve
18 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
11 comments

pb Nov 21
The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.
CalebQ42 Nov 21
The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.

What isn't enforceable? The only things they're enforcing is release date and promised content, both of which are very easily enforceable.
pb Nov 21
The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.

What isn't enforceable? The only things they're enforcing is release date and promised content, both of which are very easily enforceable.

If you say so. We'll see.
Salvatos Nov 21
Damn, nice. Valve continuing to uphold their customers-first approach against all odds :)
eldaking Nov 21
Well it is good, if season passes are a thing then having proper mechanisms is good - more transparent, easier to manage, more organized. I'm not particularly invested in the idea of season passes (I rarely buy things on release much less in advance), though I'm not strongly against it either.

The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.

That is presumably why they are only doing it with selected partners with a proven track record. This is likely going to work more as a friendly agreement than a set of hard rules.
The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.

That is presumably why they are only doing it with selected partners with a proven track record. This is likely going to work more as a friendly agreement than a set of hard rules.
I think you parsed that bit wrong. As far as I can tell, what they're saying is they'll relax some requirements in terms of how specified the DLC are, only with selected partners with a proven track record. So if they know you well enough to be pretty sure you'll deliver something decent with that season pass, maybe they'll let you get away with being a bit fluffy in how you describe it.

I think it's fairly enforceable. I suppose if a developer didn't want to abide by the requirements, they could do a season pass thing without using the new season pass feature, and maybe call it something else. But if Steam has a feature for setting up season's pass things, then it should be pretty easy to flag when someone uses it so it goes by someone's in tray to do a quick once-over.
Salvatos Nov 22
The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.

That is presumably why they are only doing it with selected partners with a proven track record. This is likely going to work more as a friendly agreement than a set of hard rules.
I think you parsed that bit wrong. As far as I can tell, what they're saying is they'll relax some requirements in terms of how specified the DLC are, only with selected partners with a proven track record. So if they know you well enough to be pretty sure you'll deliver something decent with that season pass, maybe they'll let you get away with being a bit fluffy in how you describe it.
No, I'm with eldaking on this one:
If you aren't ready to clearly communicate about the content included in each DLC AND when each DLC will be ready for launch, you shouldn't offer a Season Pass on Steam.
and
(...) we will not offer a Season Pass except in a few rare cases with partners with which we have a well-established relationship and that have a proven track record on Steam.
sounds pretty cut and dry. There is nothing on the source Steam page that suggests different requirements for different partners.
The idea is good but some of it doesn't seem enforceable, I'm sure they will be adjusting these requirements.

That is presumably why they are only doing it with selected partners with a proven track record. This is likely going to work more as a friendly agreement than a set of hard rules.
I think you parsed that bit wrong. As far as I can tell, what they're saying is they'll relax some requirements in terms of how specified the DLC are, only with selected partners with a proven track record. So if they know you well enough to be pretty sure you'll deliver something decent with that season pass, maybe they'll let you get away with being a bit fluffy in how you describe it.
No, I'm with eldaking on this one:
If you aren't ready to clearly communicate about the content included in each DLC AND when each DLC will be ready for launch, you shouldn't offer a Season Pass on Steam.
and
(...) we will not offer a Season Pass except in a few rare cases with partners with which we have a well-established relationship and that have a proven track record on Steam.
sounds pretty cut and dry. There is nothing on the source Steam page that suggests different requirements for different partners.
Mm, maybe you're right. Sorry, eldaking.
Phlebiac Nov 22
A complete list of all DLC included in the Pass. (i.e. listing each of the four DLCs included in a Pass).

Seems like an odd thing to specify "four", unless that's a really common thing? Are there a lot of games that release quarterly updates these days, and sell those as "season passes"? Must be online multiplayer games, as I'm not familiar with that at all.

Edit: also meant to say: seems like some of this is meant to automate things (like refunds for canceled portions) and take some load off of Steam support.


Last edited by Phlebiac on 22 November 2024 at 5:17 am UTC
Klaas Nov 22
Seems like an odd thing to specify "four", unless that's a really common thing?
Looks like four seasons implies four DLCs in a season pass.
Salvatos Nov 22
A complete list of all DLC included in the Pass. (i.e. listing each of the four DLCs included in a Pass).

Seems like an odd thing to specify "four", unless that's a really common thing? Are there a lot of games that release quarterly updates these days, and sell those as "season passes"? Must be online multiplayer games, as I'm not familiar with that at all.
I assume they meant "e.g." rather than "i.e." I see them mixed up fairly often. They also used "i.e." to give date examples in the third bullet point, and I doubt they want every DLC to release on June 1st, 2025 ;)
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register