Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

You have to hand it to the people in suits at the top, they all sure do love AI, and the latest to be bullish about it is Take-Two's CEO Strauss Zelnick. In an interview with GamesIndustry, Zelnick was asked a few general questions but AI bit was saved for last.

It's important to understand that Take-Two are a big name considering they own the likes of Rockstar Games, Zynga and 2K.

GamesIndustry asked: "Another hot topic at the moment, and you've mentioned it in the past, is AI's role in the industry. What role does it play in Take-Two's strategy going forward and are there any guardrails you think the industry needs to be considering in terms of AI?"

Zelnick replied: "Artificial intelligence is an oxymoron, there's no such thing. Machine learning, machines don't learn. Those are convenient ways to explain to human beings what looks like magic. The bottom line is that these are digital tools and we've used digital tools forever. I have no doubt that what is considered AI today will help make our business more efficient and help us do better work, but it won't reduce employment.

To the contrary, the history of digital technology is that technology increases employment, increases productivity, increases GDP and I think that's what's going to happen with AI. I think the video game business will probably be on the leading, if not bleeding, edge of using AI.

But in terms of the guardrails, if you mean, you know, not infringing on other people's intellectual property by, you know, poaching their LLMs, yeah, we're not going to do that. Moreover, if we did, we couldn't protect that, we wouldn't be able to protect our own IP. So of course, we're mindful of what technology we use to make sure that it respects others' intellectual property and allows us to protect our own. Apart from that, I really can't think of any new guardrails that need to be implemented."

Like it or not, this appears to be where the industry is going. So much so that since January 2024, Valve now require AI disclosures from developers on Steam. The GDC 2025 survey gives us some interesting insight though, noting that 52% of developers survey noted they're working for companies that have implemented generative AI

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: AI, Misc
4 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
You can also find comments for this article on social media: Mastodon
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
13 comments Subscribe

gradyvuckovic 5 hours ago
In economics, productivity is a measure of how much output is produced with a given set of inputs.

Soooo.... we're going to increase productivity.... while also employing more people?....

That's pretty much the definition of reduced productivity. Unless he thinks we're also going to somehow sell even more games and products. Sounds like the kind of nonsense you feed investors. "Yes we're going to hire more people, and we're going to make more games, faster, and sell more of them, and have even higher profit, and there's going to be a pony, and a rainbow, and everyone's pets are going to come back to life!" Sure Zelnick.

Press X to Doubt

Artificial intelligence is an oxymoron

No. It isn't. I don't know when it happened, but somewhere along the line, people started pronouncing "Artificial" to sound like "Actual" I guess and got confused. But the word Artificial does mean "fake". The whole concept of this term "ARTIFICIAL Intelligence" is that the intelligence isn't real. We use the word Artificial Intelligence in the same way we use the term "Fake Grass". Fake grass is not an oxymoron. It's grass that is fake! Artificial intelligence is not an oxymoron, it's intelligence that is fake!

"Artificial Hearts" are not hearts. "Artificial Lakes" are not lakes. "Artificial Flowers" are not flowers. This isn't an oxymoron.

You would think someone from the games industry, which has been using the term artificial intelligence going back to the 80s and 90s to describe game character behaviour, would realise that!


Last edited by gradyvuckovic on 7 Feb 2025 at 11:30 am UTC
chr 5 hours ago
Being on the wayside of an effective altruism group that engages with these topics a lot, and having very basic debating training, and having read a book or two about philosophy in relation to AI - what a load of demagoguery 🤮
elmapul 4 hours ago
" and we've used digital tools forever. "
the bullshit starts here... or a bit latter, but this part is already missleading
elmapul 4 hours ago
Soooo.... we're going to increase productivity.... while also employing more people?....

that is possible if by increasing productivity you sell more and as an result you can hire more, the issue is that you selling more means someone else is selling less, you are just moving the marketshare from one company to another.
so you lose thousands of jobs in one side and get a few new ones on the other...
but, with less competition you also have less reasons to hire a ton of people...

so , no.
SirBubbles 4 hours ago
So to me this seems like a case of "We have shareholders to appease. Shareholders LOVE AI! Please give us money!"
More like an investor q&a than anything else. With some kind of reptile like person.
Talon1024 4 hours ago
Meanwhile, IBM claims they are already "replacing as many workers with AI as possible".

Because, of course, who needs puny humans when you can have an AI do the work for you for free? Never mind the fact that these puny humans also have basic needs to pay for. This is what pisses me off about this AI gold rush.
Xpander 4 hours ago
Everything is fake now. Companies are valued on hype. Internet is dead with full of Bots and AI. AI is more valuable than Creativity. Fake AI frames make our GPUs "faster".
Eike 3 hours ago
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
From a software developers perspective, AI actually is a mere tool. It does help from time to time, it does lead astray from time to time. Of course, this might change, but I don't see my job endangered by what they have to offer at the moment. Additionally, they will have to charge sooner or later, when all the trillions or whatever of monies pumped into it have been spent.

Let's see.
amatai 3 hours ago
  • Supporter
But in terms of the guardrails, if you mean, you know, not infringing on other people's intellectual property by
Not infringing on other people's intellectual property ?
, you know, poaching their LLMs
Nevermind.

Joke aside, I do actually agree that AI is just a digital tool albeit not very reliable nor efficient in its last iteration. It has its use.


Last edited by amatai on 7 Feb 2025 at 12:41 pm UTC
devland 3 hours ago
tl;dr: Pls don't eat the rich when they fire you. They fire you because you suck not because an AI or cheaper work force will take your place. /$


Last edited by devland on 7 Feb 2025 at 12:52 pm UTC
scaine 3 hours ago
View PC info
  • Contributing Editor
  • Mega Supporter
There's a huge, enormous, gulf-like difference between "using AI tools to increase our employees productivity" and "using AI tools to replace creative individuals".

The first is inevitable. Railing against AI at this point is useless, because AI is already entrenched in so many products (thanks hype-machine!) that there's no getting away from it. That ship has sailed. No putting it back in the box. Investment, shareholder pressure and a general public who are happy to take shortcuts on their writing skills have "enabled" it. It's here. We need to deal with it.

The second is within our control as consumers. If GTA6 (or any other game) launches and they've used a single line of AI bullshit to replace a voice artist (because they're on strike... because... AI) then it's up to us to yeet that shite right into the sea, where it belongs. Along with AI "art".


Last edited by scaine on 7 Feb 2025 at 1:07 pm UTC
tarmo888 2 hours ago
I think he is spot on. Generative AI is not going to prompt itself. Well, it actually already does, but the initial prompt comes from a person anyways, recursive prompts just try to get better results for the initial prompt. Games aren't going to be more simple, they will grow in complexity, so there will be more developers who will be prompting the generative AI.

And the copyright issue will be solved too, each company will have their own trained AI silos, trained with their own copyrighted material. Right now is just confusing transition time.
minidou 2 hours ago
He's right
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register



Buy Games
Buy games with our affiliate / partner links: