Great news for game developers and everyone involved in the industry that isn't at the top of the chain, as the Communications Workers of America (CWA) in partnership with the American Federation of Musicians (AFM) have announced an industry-wide video game union.
Called the UVW-CWA (United Videogame Workers-CWA), their aim is to help protect workers rights, which is sorely needed, given the absolute masses of layoffs over the last few years, which still shows no real sign of stopping.
“The creation of this union was not done in isolation; it’s a cumulative effort by the thousands of video game workers who have been fighting for years to redefine what it means to stand together and reclaim power in one of the largest and highest-grossing industries on the globe,” said Tom Smith, CWA’s Senior Director of Organizing. “These workers are taking a bold stand, joining together to build power for the workers behind the games we all know and love.”
“Our mission is to take back our lives, our labor, and our passion from those who treat us like replaceable cogs; to empower our fellow workers; to link up arms with the laid off, with the freelancer, with the disillusioned contractor, with the disenfranchised and the marginalized, with the workers laboring invisibly to keep this industry afloat,” reads UVW-CWA’s mission statement. “We are going to create a game industry that works for us, one that nourishes its talent and invests in its future, rather than constantly seeking short-term profits. We are the ones that make the games, so we must be the ones that set the terms of how we work.”
See more in their news post. You can also follow the UVW-CWA website and their Bluesky account.
Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Some you may have missed, popular articles from the last month:
You can also find comments for this article on social media: Mastodon
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
Ehvis 14 hours ago
We are going to create a game industry that works for us, one that nourishes its talent and invests in its future, rather than constantly seeking short-term profits.
That's not really the goal of most investors in the current game industry. They want the steepest upward line and don't care about the corpses it leaves in their wake. I wonder if this might actually lead to even more departures from the US. I'd be nice if the industry could be satisfied with more sensible growth strategies, but I'm not too hopeful.
8 Likes
Szkodnix 13 hours ago
Worker unions are definitely needed. I am glad that they decided to finally create one.
9 Likes
Mountain Man 13 hours ago
To be honest, I've seen unions cause more problems than they solve. They tend to cost companies more while doing little if anything to improve the quality of work, and it becomes much harder to fire unproductive employees. The biggest gimmick of unions is that they promise to stop the little guy from getting screwed by fat cat CEOs, but that's only because they're getting screwed by fat cat union bosses instead.
6 Likes
Sakuretsu 13 hours ago
Finally an union for that industry.
9 Likes
Eike 13 hours ago
To be honest, I've seen unions cause more problems than they solve. They tend to cost companies more
Where does this money go?
8 Likes
Mountain Man 13 hours ago
"Where does this money go?"
In theory, to the workers. In actuality, to the union bosses who take a generous cut in the form of compulsory union dues and other fees.
In theory, to the workers. In actuality, to the union bosses who take a generous cut in the form of compulsory union dues and other fees.
4 Likes
Where does this money go?I'm assuming he's referring to how it costs the company more to negotiate fairly. In my opinion, the point of the union is not to make workers more productive nor improve quality of work but rather to give the workers a boost in a very unfair relationship. It's amazing how the fat cats have managed to convince a subset of workers that having a collective voice to challenge the company is bad. Worker's rights have a lot to thank unions for.
14 Likes
TightRope 12 hours ago
Corporations are consolidating and taking employee options away. How do they change jobs, when there are so few other employers to work for? It is good to see employees consolidate to get a better contract.
7 Likes
Kimyrielle 11 hours ago
To be honest, I've seen unions cause more problems than they solve.
While that's not entirely without merit, keep in mind that unions wouldn't be needed if not close to 100% of all companies wouldn't treat their employees like crap.
5 Likes
Mountain Man 10 hours ago
...keep in mind that unions wouldn't be needed if not close to 100% of all companies wouldn't treat their employees like crap.Most companies don't treat their employees like crap. That would be counterproductive. I can honestly say that throughout my career, I've worked for around half-a-dozen employers, only one of which treated me like crap, so I did the sensible thing and left. Not surprisingly, the company ceased operation less than a year later.
So in my experience, if you're competent and reliable, you'll be well compensated for your work without having to make a union boss rich.
----------
The average union in the US nets their employees an additional 10-20% in wages while taking about 1.5-2% in wages for fees every year. I'd say that's a pretty good return for employees.It depends. Some unions charge more than others, and there are often additional fees on top of the annual dues. Many unions also have a significant upfront cost just to join.
That's not even accounting for the benefits that aren't wage related.
Personally, I've never worked for a union, but I have worked with unions, and in every case, they have made the working experience worse. The union members have, without fail, been entitled and lazy (because they're protected by the union from being fired, they have no incentive to work hard); they'll routinely send four people to do a job that only requires one; if you tell them a job needs to be completed in four hours, they'll take four hours to do it in order to avoid being given more work; if their lunch break is one hour, they'll demand an additional 15 minutes before and 15 minutes after so they have time to wash their hands, get their lunchboxes from their lockers, etc., meaning their lunch hour is really 90 minutes; and so on.
In short, my experience is that unions are bad for business.
2 Likes
Salvatos 10 hours ago
In Mountain Man's defence, where I live, we have solid worker protections at the government level and unions are large companies operated like protection rackets leeching money off of workers and using it to lobby the government for private interests, all while making it nearly impossible to fire bad actors who suck up to the union even if they make every other employee miserable and push them to resign (a friend of mine has been going through exactly that repeatedly).
In many third world countries like the US, the situation is quite different (either with regards to standard worker rights or how unions work) and they are definitely still needed, so hopefully this particular one will do some good.
In many third world countries like the US, the situation is quite different (either with regards to standard worker rights or how unions work) and they are definitely still needed, so hopefully this particular one will do some good.
1 Likes
What about the mass immigration of "qualified" coders coming from India and other places that lower wages and push natives out of the labour market. Curiously we never hear a word about that from Unions.Well, if these immigrants from India are in the union, they have to get paid the same, so the incentive to import them disappears and the negative impacts of their presence in dragging down wages goes away. So unions don't really have to talk about that situation because the presence of unions kind of automatically eliminates it as a problem.
4 Likes
Kimyrielle 10 hours ago
Most companies don't treat their employees like crap.
I am fairly confident that you think that because most of us are conditioned to accept being treated like crap by employers to be "normal", so we just won't expect anything better.
That would be counterproductive.
Not really. Paying workers the lowest possible wages while making them work the longest possible hours, under the worst conditions permitted by law is profitable, because the owners get to keep more of your productivity. If somebody quits, they just hire the next person to exploit while they can.
Last edited by Kimyrielle on 20 Mar 2025 at 5:20 pm UTC
6 Likes
TheSHEEEP 8 hours ago
Even though I am extremely sceptical of unions and have to agree with Mountain Man here on most points, I did always find it curious how the games industry never really had one, especially considering all the big corporations it houses by now and how rather, uhm... "progressive", a large portion of the workforce is.
Well, maybe something good will come from it.
Or maybe this will only serve as an excuse for execs to increase prices for games without any of that additional money landing in devs' pockets.
Or something in between.
So the real choice for the company becomes "expensive unionized workforce" vs "cheap labor".
The only real question is if enough cheap labor is available to companies to avoid having to go for unionized workers.
Oddly enough, the US current stance of "US first (and only)" might actually play somewhat into unions' hands.
But overall, my expectation is that this will go well for the higher educated, difficult-to-replace workers and really, really poorly for everyone lower on the ladder.
Last edited by TheSHEEEP on 20 Mar 2025 at 7:17 pm UTC
Well, maybe something good will come from it.
Or maybe this will only serve as an excuse for execs to increase prices for games without any of that additional money landing in devs' pockets.
Or something in between.
Well, if these immigrants from India are in the union, they have to get paid the same, so the incentive to import them disappears and the negative impacts of their presence in dragging down wages goes away. So unions don't really have to talk about that situation because the presence of unions kind of automatically eliminates it as a problem.You somehow assume cheap labor automatically lands in a union. It doesn't unless some law required it to - and I think we can all agree such a law would never pass, especially not in the US.
So the real choice for the company becomes "expensive unionized workforce" vs "cheap labor".
The only real question is if enough cheap labor is available to companies to avoid having to go for unionized workers.
Oddly enough, the US current stance of "US first (and only)" might actually play somewhat into unions' hands.
But overall, my expectation is that this will go well for the higher educated, difficult-to-replace workers and really, really poorly for everyone lower on the ladder.
Last edited by TheSHEEEP on 20 Mar 2025 at 7:17 pm UTC
0 Likes
@TheSHEEEP: Yes, assuming low union density and general anti-union rules, just a few unionized workers cannot create the effect I described. But with high union density, particularly if it's high enough to wield the amount of power unions have historically managed in northern Europe, it does. The political power matters because you end up with things like sectoral bargaining, meaning even non-union workers get the deal the unions negotiate.
I don't think it's a valid anti-union argument to say low levels of unionization will not create all the virtuous effects you get from high levels of unionization.
Even so, if Firm X becomes a union shop, the argument is valid within that firm: You employ someone at that firm, they get to join the union whether they're from India or Turkmenistan or Antarctica.
Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 20 Mar 2025 at 7:34 pm UTC
I don't think it's a valid anti-union argument to say low levels of unionization will not create all the virtuous effects you get from high levels of unionization.
Even so, if Firm X becomes a union shop, the argument is valid within that firm: You employ someone at that firm, they get to join the union whether they're from India or Turkmenistan or Antarctica.
Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 20 Mar 2025 at 7:34 pm UTC
1 Likes
Linux_Rocks 6 hours ago
It's great to see the class divide here in the comments.
While class collaborationism by union leadership and any issues with union bosses or idiots is stupid and annoying. Organized labor is much better than not, and I sure as hell don't feel bad for any privileged middle class anti-labor pissants who've had "bad experiences" dealing with union workers. Really kinda playing a false blame game there too.
Most companies treat their workers like shit and it's bullshit to say otherwise. It's only when you get into more privileged jobs do they tend to not treat their workers as bad. The shit that many working class people have to deal with is far different than the privileged middle class engineering or bourgeois businessperson fantasyland. I've worked for engineering and testing companies, and I've worked shitty retail and industrial jobs as well. Been on both sides of that fence at different times in my life.
If you're working class and argue against organized labor, then you're a class traitor and just as bad as the middle and ruling classes. (Just like how Uncle Toms are just as bad as stupid rednecks.) As far as I'm concerned "the capitalists will sell us the rope we use to hang them" and I truly hope for the worst for enemies of the working class. Whether they be bourgeois and imperialist politicians, anti-labor pissants, bigots, and/or class traitors to the working class. Fuck xenophobia and bigotry! Solidarity with all of the immigrants! Workers of the world, unite!
While class collaborationism by union leadership and any issues with union bosses or idiots is stupid and annoying. Organized labor is much better than not, and I sure as hell don't feel bad for any privileged middle class anti-labor pissants who've had "bad experiences" dealing with union workers. Really kinda playing a false blame game there too.
Most companies treat their workers like shit and it's bullshit to say otherwise. It's only when you get into more privileged jobs do they tend to not treat their workers as bad. The shit that many working class people have to deal with is far different than the privileged middle class engineering or bourgeois businessperson fantasyland. I've worked for engineering and testing companies, and I've worked shitty retail and industrial jobs as well. Been on both sides of that fence at different times in my life.
If you're working class and argue against organized labor, then you're a class traitor and just as bad as the middle and ruling classes. (Just like how Uncle Toms are just as bad as stupid rednecks.) As far as I'm concerned "the capitalists will sell us the rope we use to hang them" and I truly hope for the worst for enemies of the working class. Whether they be bourgeois and imperialist politicians, anti-labor pissants, bigots, and/or class traitors to the working class. Fuck xenophobia and bigotry! Solidarity with all of the immigrants! Workers of the world, unite!
2 Likes
Patreon
PayPal
How to set, change and reset your SteamOS / Steam Deck desktop sudo password
How to set up Decky Loader on Steam Deck / SteamOS for easy plugins
See more from me