Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

Ubuntu 25.04 'Plucky Puffin' is out now

By - [updated]
Last updated: 18 Apr 2025 at 3:28 pm UTC

Update 18/04/25 16:28 BST: upgrades have been halted due to a major bug.


Canonical has today released Ubuntu 25.04, codenamed "Plucky Puffin", their latest feature upgrade release to one of the most popular Linux distributions. This also includes updates for all the other editions like Kubuntu. It will be supported for 9 months until January 2026 as this is not a long term support release.

This release has been dedicated to Steve Langasek, who sadly passed away January 1st. As said in the release announcement:

Subscribers to the ubuntu-{devel-}announce mailing list and long term participants in the Ubuntu community will have come across Steve Langasek’s work. Steve, known in the community as vorlon, was a long-term member of the Release team (along with being a member of Archive Admin, Techboard, SRU team, and so on) and a colleague to many of us at Canonical. As a member of the Release team, Steve was responsible for devising many of the processes, policies, and tools which we use today, and teaching his fellow members the ropes. Steve passed away on 1st January 2025 after being unwell for quite some time. The Ubuntu Release Team dedicates 25.04 “Plucky Puffin” to our colleague and friend, Steve Langasek. He is missed and will live in our hearts forever. Thank you for everything, Steve.

I've been running Kubuntu 25.04, since I prefer KDE Plasma, since the Beta release and it has been really smooth. Overall very happy with it as my main choice for my desktop workstation and gaming PC.


Pictured - Ubuntu 25.04

There's a lot of upgrades in this one including Linux kernel 6.14, which includes the new NTSYNC driver for Wine / Proton. Although don't get too excited about it increasing Windows game performance. There's also the new ARM64 Desktop Image, GNOME 48 and lots of assorted software upgrades. For gamers on NVIDIA GPU laptops, you'll be hopefully pleased with NVIDIA Dynamic Boost being enabled by default which should give a bit more performance. Plus there's also support for newer Intel GPUs along with Mesa 25.0.

Installation and upgrades should be easier too. The installer added the option to replace an existing Ubuntu install, and there's better support for dual booting with Windows with BitLocker.

See the release notes announcement for more.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
9 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
You can also find comments for this article on social media: Mastodon
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
32 comments Subscribe
Page: 1/2»
  Go to:

Fester_Mudd a day ago
Very good performance!

Nvidia dynamic boost is now default and a fresh kernel. Snaps work great now
dziadulewicz a day ago
@Fester_Mudd

Steam's Snap now actually even outperforms the deb one: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/steam-deb-vs-steam-snap-performance-comparison/56811
Kimyrielle a day ago
I ditched Ubuntu for Mint a while back. Yes, because of Snap. If I wanted a proprietary, vendor-controlled app store, I'd have bought a Mac. Going back from KDE Plasma to Cinnamon felt like a step backwards at first, but Cinnamon is decent enough these days. I will take almost any UI not called Gnome 3. :D
Linuxer a day ago
kimyrielle

Snap store is open source
dziadulewicz a day ago
Users can also create and distribute their own snaps outside of the Snap Store if they so want, and the Snap client can be configured to use a different server.

There is a lot of misinformation spread by Canonical haters. Hard to understand why they waste their energy and just use what they want and prefer ..
Kimyrielle a day ago
Snap store is open source

Unless something dramatically changed last time I checked, the Snap Store is NOT open source.

A quick glance at the Wiki page seems to confirm that nothing has changed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snap_(software)

Mind pointing me to a source saying otherwise?
Highball a day ago
https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft?tab=GPL-3.0-1-ov-file


Looks like the store is covered there.
scaine a day ago
  • Contributing Editor
  • Mega Supporter
@Kimyrielle

Unless something dramatically changed last time I checked, the Snap Store is NOT open source.

A quick glance at the Wiki page seems to confirm that nothing has changed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snap_(software)
What bit are you looking at? Snap Store is only mentioned once in that Wikipedia entry, and I can't see any mention of its licence there.

But should we even care? We use the AUR and trust it. We use Flathub and trust it. But we mustn't use the Snap Store because... why? Proprietary? So is Steam, but here we are on GOL. Hell, GitHub is closed source, which led to Canonical creating Launchpad, which is open source.

And even if the Snap Store IS still proprietary, you can just not use it. Get your Snaps elsewhere. Self-host them. Like you can do with Flathub, but which no-one actually does, because FlatHub is convenient.
Tuxee a day ago
@Scaine

Couldn't agree more with you. When it comes to Snap about half of the Linux world is into running its own backend store. You forgot to mention that we trust the deb packages published by the very same company which apparently runs a completely untrustworthy proprietary Snap store...
Fester_Mudd a day ago
@Kimyrielle

It says also clearly on https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft.io (Snap Store and where the source code is):

"The content of this project is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license, and the underlying code used to format and display that content is licensed under the LGPLv3"

The thing is actually very clear. That Wikipedia article does not help on this, only confuses.
dziadulewicz a day ago
Surprisingly many also here seem very confused or totally ignorant about Snaps and facts related to them!

Every byte of software you run on your computer (gnome-software and gnome-software-plugin-snap) is completely open source, as well as snapd, AppArmor and everything else having anything to do with running a snap on your computer.

The only thing that isn't open source is the backend server that hosts the online repository and updates, which is also completely optional.

So what's the problem here. As noted earlier; why do you Canonical bashers then run for example Steam? You're not making any sense as far as i can tell
tuubi a day ago
  • Supporter Plus
What bit are you looking at? Snap Store is only mentioned once in that Wikipedia entry, and I can't see any mention of its licence there.
You don't see the license information in the box under the logo? To me it says "GNU GPLv3 (Client & Runtime), proprietary (Backend)[2]".

Technically you could implement your own backend. Maybe there's even an official way to do this as you seem to imply, I wouldn't know or care to find out. But that doesn't change the fact that Canonical's own implementation is proprietary. Or the fact that "host your own" is a disingenuous thing to suggest when it's way more practical to simply use something else.

Whether or not you trust Canonical is up to you, obviously.



It says also clearly on https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft.io (Snap Store and where the source code is):
That repository hosts the code for the snapcraft.io website and doesn't include the snap store backend. This doesn't contradict the license information on Wikipedia.
sudoer a day ago
Kubuntu has been in constant decline since at least 23.04, (basically it's been like that since the main maintainer left and did KDE Neon with more people leaving constantly I assume) I wouldn't recommend it. Just look at all the upgrade problems emerging with 25.04 and all the mispackaging issues and misconfigurations since 24.04. Personally I couldn't enable video hardware acceleration with Chromium only in 25.04 beta but I could basically everywhere else, OpenMandriva, Fedora, Elementary and what not. If you want KDE from the so-called "mainstream" distros, Fedora KDE edition is most probably the better and more professional choice.


Last edited by sudoer on 18 Apr 2025 at 10:56 am UTC
dziadulewicz a day ago
@Tuubi

So the server back end is proprietary, as most websites server that people visit are.
Snap Store, snapd, AppArmor and everything else you run (in means of snaps) are completely open source.
knro a day ago
  • Supporter
I've been using Ubuntu exclusively for 15 years and just this year I decided to try Arch (Endeavor OS) and very happy with the transition. I was hesitant all these years to switch as I didn't want to disturb my workflows but so far haven't really had any issues and very glad I'm on the bleeding edge.

I got a new X870 motherboard and when I was reading that I needed to compile kernel modules to get things working with Ubuntu, I decided to get Arch and everything worked perfectly out of the box!
dziadulewicz a day ago
@knro

Many on GOL too have done that same but eventually for some obvious reason returned to Ubuntu I recall also LiamD was on Endeavour, then Fedora and now on Ubuntu (Kubuntu).
tuubi a day ago
  • Supporter Plus
@dziadulewicz

So the server back end is proprietary, as most websites server that people visit are.
Snap Store, snapd, AppArmor and everything else you run (in means of snaps) are completely open source.

No, that literally doesn't make Snap Store completely open source.

I'm not going to follow this conversation any further as I have no pony in this race. I simply prefer free and open source tech, and don't like it when people (and corporations) try to convince me that there's no difference.
Eike 24 hours ago
  • Supporter Plus
@dziadulewicz

So the server back end is proprietary, as most websites server that people visit are.
Snap Store, snapd, AppArmor and everything else you run (in means of snaps) are completely open source.


No, that literally doesn't make Snap Store completely open source.

They said "everything else you run", so there's no contradiction between what you both are saying.


Last edited by Eike on 18 Apr 2025 at 12:00 pm UTC
tuubi 24 hours ago
  • Supporter Plus
They said "everything else you run", so there's no contradiction between what you both are saying.
You're right, he probably only means the Snap Store client. Which doesn't do anything useful without the proprietary backend.
sonic2kk 22 hours ago
I didn't know Steve Langasek, and even though it was a while ago, it's still sad to hear of a loss like this. Rest in Peace.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register