While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations: 
PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- Valve released the Best of Steam - 2024 showing off the highest earners and most played games
- Firaxis reveal Sid Meier's Civilization VII system requirements for Linux
- Windows compatibility layer Wine 10.0 third Release Candidate out now
- Direct3D to Vulkan translation layer DXVK v2.5.2 brings fixes for Alpha Protocol, The Sims 2, Borderlands 2 and more
- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year from GamingOnLinux
- > See more over 30 days here
http://seekingalpha.com/article/896471-activision-blizzard-how-a-change-to-starcraft-2-could-increase-revenues
It's horrible to see how little they care about actually satisfying gamers... It's seems it's all about getting the most out of the people already having the game instead of trying to get new customers... He doesn't even ask why Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 had less buyers than expected.
I know it's not surprising, but it's the first time I've seen such an article.
[I used to play starcraft a lot in the past and was quite excited about starcraft 2 coming out, but I'm part of those who never bought the game for several reasons (DRM, no GNU/Linux support, etc). The only reason I'm still more or less interested in news about the game is because of the story.]
I don't see how SC2 has the worst business model at all, it's a commercial game, it's meant to be built and sold which is exactly what they are doing, you can guarantee most players will buy the expansions as well further increasing revenue for them.
If SC2 came out with subscription fee's a lot of people would drop it in favour of the other masses of RTS games out there.
I really hate that this is how some people view games - as a cash cow rather than an actual game.