Check out our Monthly Survey Page to see what our users are running.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Pocketpair respond to the Nintendo and Pokemon Company lawsuit for Palworld

By -
Last updated: 8 Nov 2024 at 11:25 am UTC

Pocketpair, developers of Palworld, have put up a statement on the new lawsuit that has been filed against them from Nintendo and The Pokemon Company.

Here's the statement in full:

Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed against our company for patent infringement.

We have received notice of this lawsuit and will begin the appropriate legal proceedings and investigations into the claims of patent infringement.

At this moment, we are unaware of the specific patents we are accused of infringing upon, and we have not been notified of such details.

Pocketpair is a small indie game company based in Tokyo. Our goal as a company has always been to create fun games. We will continue to pursue this goal because we know that our games bring joy to millions of gamers around the world. Palworld was a surprise success this year, both for gamers and for us. We were blown away by the amazing response to the game and have been working hard to make it even better for our fans. We will continue improving Palworld and strive to create a game that our fans can be proud of.

It is truly unfortunate that we will be forced to allocate significant time to matters unrelated to game development due to this lawsuit. However, we will do our utmost for our fans, and to ensure that indie game developers are not hindered or discouraged from pursuing their creative ideas.

We apologize to our fans and supporters for any worry or discomfort that this news has caused.

As always, thank you for your continued support of Palworld and Pocketpair.


When it comes to what patent infringement Nintendo / Pokemon could be going after Pocketpair for, well, Nintendo actually have quite a number of patents that are for some very specific game mechanics. Which could be really problematic not just for Pocketpair, but all game developers looking to do anything similar.

Take for example this patent (approved in Japan, pending in the USA), that covers the feature of capturing creatures by throwing an object and sending out a character (like a Pokemon) to engage in combat.

Remember, this is not about copyright infringement, so they're not specifically going after any of the creature designs, but it's about the patents.

This is going to be a legal fight to remember. One perhaps for the history books.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc, Nintendo | Apps: Palworld
16 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
27 comments Subscribe
Page: 1/2»
  Go to:

Pengling 20 Sep 2024
Take for example this patent (approved in Japan, pending in the USA), that covers the feature of capturing creatures by throwing an object and sending out a character (like a Pokemon) to engage in combat.
I'm surprised this was approved, considering that there's prior-art - the 1994 SNES RPG Robotrek featured robots who were kept in capsules and sent out into battle, for example.

Also, at this point in time, almost 30 years after Pokemon debuted (if they'd patented this back then, it would've expired by now - I'm not sure why they left it so long!), the creatures-in-capsules concept could fairly be considered to be scènes à faire, much like happened with fighting-game tropes in the outcome of Capcom U.S.A. Inc. v. Data East Corp..
Turkeysteaks 20 Sep 2024
View PC info
  • Supporter
Don't have many feelings for palworld itself, but this sets a bad precedent.

It should not be legal to patent things like that for software. All of software is iterative, and some of the absolute best products have come from expanding or twisting an idea that was previously made. They're not even that specific - I can think of some games very unlike pokemon that also have those mechanics.

Next Nintendo will be patenting the mechanic to jump in a two dimensional world...
DrNick 20 Sep 2024
It's too bad Akira Toriyama isn't around to see this.
jams3223 20 Sep 2024
Support the petition against patenting game mechanics.
https://chng.it/b4TQYrcmj2
a0kami 20 Sep 2024
nintendo just went #1 patent troll 🤦
drdindu2 20 Sep 2024
patenting the pokeball mechanic is as stupid as apple patenting rounded corners.
tmtvl 20 Sep 2024
I'm surprised this was approved, considering that there's prior-art - the 1994 SNES RPG Robotrek featured robots who were kept in capsules and sent out into battle, for example.

Well, the people who work at the patent office can't know everything, so especially when a large important entity like Nintendo comes along I can well imagine they just do a cursory glance at the application, briefly consider if they know anything that would be an issue with it, and just give the okay.

Anyway, my expectation is that Nintendo isn't going to take it all the way to court, they're probably aiming at an out-of-court settlement and if that doesn't happen they'll probably back off.
mrdeathjr 20 Sep 2024
vs nintenshit

!link

whizse 20 Sep 2024
View PC info
  • Supporter
I'm surprised this was approved, considering that there's prior-art - the 1994 SNES RPG Robotrek featured robots who were kept in capsules and sent out into battle, for example.
Not a lawyer, but as far as I know, the only prior art searches done by the patent office before approval is by looking at current/pending/prior patents.
whizse 20 Sep 2024
View PC info
  • Supporter
Anyway, my expectation is that Nintendo isn't going to take it all the way to court, they're probably aiming at an out-of-court settlement and if that doesn't happen they'll probably back off.
That sadly seems likely and is of course the classic strategy of patent trolls.
Seegras 20 Sep 2024
Of course, being a mechanic of a computer games makes this a) a pure software patent and thus not patentable in Europe and b) mathematics and this not patentable in Europe and the rest of the world. The Japan patent was granted illegally.

The patent mentioned above is the classic case of a "Moby Dick Support Device" https://seegras.discordia.ch/Blog/the-moby-dick-support-device/

On an unrelated note, "game mechanics" and -rules are explicitly not copyrightable.
melkemind 20 Sep 2024
View PC info
  • Supporter
Capturing a creature by throwing out an object wasn't invented by Pokemon. Humans have been doing that for thousands of years.
Purple Library Guy 20 Sep 2024
Patents have gotten kind of twisted since the old days. I mean, originally one of the conditions was, you show a working model. By those rules, show us a working pokeball or pound sand.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around why an entirely fictional idea should be a patentable kind of thing.
tohur 20 Sep 2024
Lets not Ignore the fact that the game Pokemon is inspired by and copied many of the OG Pokemon from and EVEN had a Ball throwing mechanic to catch the monsters existed many years before Pokemon.. If anyone should be suing anyone here should be Square Enix suing Nintendo because Square Enix owns the rights to said game. Japan should be ashamed for giving Nintendo a patent on something they did NOT originally come up with and the sus thing is this patent was granted to Nintendo after it was known Palworld was under development as trailers and such were already out


Last edited by tohur on 21 Sep 2024 at 5:19 am UTC
tohur 21 Sep 2024
Well Nintendo should fail this law suit.. has come to light today the patents they are suing Palworld over were filed in May 2024 and granted LAST month... there is NO way that can stand.


Last edited by tohur on 21 Sep 2024 at 5:20 am UTC
tpau 21 Sep 2024
There are many fans of Nintendo games that keep their favourite franchises alive and instead of hiring them and patting them on the shoulder for a job well done, Nintendo strikes them with a DCMA TakeDown request.
It is sad to see.
TheRiddick 21 Sep 2024
there is NO way that can stand.

Perhaps their strategy is simply to bankrupt them in legal fees. Not to win.
Purple Library Guy 21 Sep 2024
there is NO way that can stand.

Perhaps their strategy is simply to bankrupt them in legal fees. Not to win.
Wouldn't be the first time.
Or, to use the fact that a full trial would bankrupt the opponent with legal fees, to force concessions in a settlement.
Purple Library Guy 21 Sep 2024
Well Nintendo should fail this law suit.. has come to light today the patents they are suing Palworld over were filed in May 2024 and granted LAST month... there is NO way that can stand.
So . . . even the filing, after Palworld came out. Actually, I would figure the Palworld folks should be able to even avoid a huge expensive trial if that's all Nintendo have got . . . I mean, not an expert, but surely a motion to dismiss would have a pretty good chance.


Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 21 Sep 2024 at 8:30 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register