Latest Comments

Quoting: bubexelIt have direct mode for VR? Anyone knows?...

The drivers 381.09 had already Direct Mode support for SteamVR.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: DarkMavrikWell from what I noticed of the 200+ Linux games I have the only ones I noticed broke after updating was feral interactive games. SO figured this was an issue with their ports, if not my mistake.

I thought it was more to do with how Steam integrates these games in its system.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: EhvisI'm just waiting for someone to provide an interesting take on Spice Clove. No idea how to match that to Shogun 2.

You wanted Cloves? Cloves you get, the Spice Cloves comes from Indonesia, add that to Samurai & you get Tekken Tag Tournament 2, I know tenuous at best but the link is there. ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: spiffyk

Quoting: GuestBut where are our ****ing performance optimizations for specific games?

You mean where are the workarounds introduced to make up for a game abusing the API? To hell with that.

It's more complicated than that in reality :) Your example is one thing that can happen in certain cases :( however you can also easily get the same effect for a number of other reasons.

The most likely on Linux is if a game is using newer implemented features that are not optimised fully in the drivers. Every new game can have the potential to use an API in a completely legal way but also hit an unexpected inefficiency in the drivers for certain specific hardware as real life usage rarely matches benchmark sample code. Life Is Strange on the NV10x0 series for example had a massive performance boost due to the game uncovering a use case that wasn't covered for that hardware when the game launched.

That means the end user might get a driver update that looks like performance optimisations for specific games when it's actually optimising the drivers and this impacts a popular game that uses that area of the drivers or API. Usually the issue in the driver might even have been highlighted by that game.

The Open Source Mesa drivers are littered with examples of this in the past 2 years. You can pick almost any game shipped within the last couple of years and benchmark the speed with 2 year old drivers and again now and you'll likely see huge boosts none of which are workarounds due to API abuse. As more games came to Linux and more Mesa developers had real life examples it allows them to optimised the drivers more as well as the more reported new features.

The second reason is linked to various API, hardware and game engine design choices. When optimising and designing a game you can have multiple ways of doing things that *should* all run fast but sometimes due to how drivers might work or how the underlying silicon of a specific card designed means they won't run as fast as expected.

This means you can end up with two (or more) different ways of optimising the same call in a graphics driver depending on how it's used and neither usage is wrong. If different games use these different philosophies then to get the best performance in the drivers then the driver might need to analyse how the API is being used and then use the optimal path for that use case. Given the large differences between GPU ranges and the larger difference between vendors you can end up with these compromises. A "game ready" driver in most cases is just a driver that is pre-loaded with information on the best decisions to make if it hits one of these use cases. Usually the driver tries to be smart and do this at run time but that is not always possible.

That is not to say drivers haven't had some very specific game changes that should be avoided but I thought a little more detail might be interesting to readers as the common "abusing the API" meme isn't really telling the entire story or the reasons why things like game specific drivers can exist and how the line between optimisation and game specific drivers can easily get blurred when you have extremely complex systems and sometimes ambiguous API definitions.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

My fan out of control, after 10 mins of demo

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I do not think, it is ARK fault. I did not see any video, where someone had similar issues, but I see them a lot. And ARK is not only game with such glitches. I have similar issue with Master of Orion, where main character has no face and developers said this driver fault.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

ARK has issues for years and they also occur with AMD drivers, so I don't think this is a problem you can expect driver developers to fix.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

According to this, it's more dead than alive : http://steamcommunity.com/app/305840/discussions/3/1319962683446794261/?tscn=1493721851

View this comment - View article - View full comments

TY Colombo for those explanations. ^^

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So only I have such problems in ARK with nvidia drivers? I did not test latest driver version, but previous versions had this glitches in ARK. At least I have. Caves for me is unplayable at all. Whenever there is some smoke or fog, I see images, like below.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Great bundle, but Party Hard is not working on my ubuntu 16.04 LTS :( It stuck on load screen :(

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: slaapliedjeAny time I've seen the 'game optimizations' they are just settings that nVidia thinks are the optimum. I thought all the settings within Ghost Recon: Wildlands were the same, but I swear it performs worse after I clicked the 'optimize' button in the Geforce Experience application.

This isn't the same thing as what we're referring to, although it's easy to get that confused since "optimize" can cover such a broad range of things. What we're referring to are compiled in, driver level, optimizations that the user can't change and they do make games perform quite a bit better. The "optimize" button in the GeForce Exp app simply changes game settings that are available to the end user and have nothing really to do with the driver at all.

And as a side note: I also agree, the "optimize" button for the GF Exp app has almost always given me poor performance settings as well, that I would need to dial back a bit to make games run properly :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I maybe should take my fingers out of my butt and install the new Nvidia drivers.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Any time I've seen the 'game optimizations' they are just settings that nVidia thinks are the optimum. I thought all the settings within Ghost Recon: Wildlands were the same, but I swear it performs worse after I clicked the 'optimize' button in the Geforce Experience application.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Comandante ÑoñardoYes. In Windows, the Nvidia driver has a huge list of games and You can configure the driver settings for each individual games...
In Linux, to configure the driver settings for each game is not that easy.

It's not? Maybe not quite as easy, but there are Application Profiles in the NVIDIA X Server Settings that you can set up based on multiple triggers, process name being one of them.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Picked up the whole bundle at $15 looks like some good games, finally over 200 Linux games in my steam library, Bundle star has a great 1$ bundle loaded with Linux flavor

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Shogun 2, please, I am beggin here.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: spiffyk

Quoting: GuestBut where are our ****ing performance optimizations for specific games?

You mean where are the workarounds introduced to make up for a game abusing the API? To hell with that.

Actually, that's quite state of the art. Game developers and driver developers working around special use cases where the available API implementation just sucks.

With each driver release, even on Windows, NVidia introduced optimizations for certain games. That should not be necessary. Seems it is .. at least currently.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I did want to get Shadow Warrior 2 so if it is that then I will likely buy it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: liamdawe

Quoting: GuestWhat?

It should not be up to driver developers to optimize for each game.

Very true, I know that.
[But they did it for specific games in Windows/DX12 anyway](http://uk.download.nvidia.com/Windows/382.05/382.05-win10-win8-win7-desktop-release-notes.pdf), so I was just having a rant.

Yes. In Windows, the Nvidia driver has a huge list of games and You can configure the driver settings for each individual games...
In Linux, to configure the driver settings for each game is not that easy.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestVery true, I know that.
[But they did it for specific games in Windows/DX12 anyway](http://uk.download.nvidia.com/Windows/382.05/382.05-win10-win8-win7-desktop-release-notes.pdf), so I was just having a rant.

If they decided to do per-game optimizations for Linux I wouldn't stop them and would happily receive them :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Well from what I noticed of the 200+ Linux games I have the only ones I noticed broke after updating was feral interactive games. SO figured this was an issue with their ports, if not my mistake.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The Final Station, ClusterTruck and Punch Club won me over this bundle really quickly!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Stop teasing start releasing :D ... nah, I've a so huge backlog of games that I hope they take a year or so to release.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestBut where are our ****ing performance optimizations for specific games?

I understand where you're coming from, but I would personally prefer Nvidia focus on keeping up and improving the overall driver quality than find workarounds for individual titles. I think Linux will need a much larger market share before Nvidia will care to allocate resources for doing these types of optimizations.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: DarkMavrikDo we have any idea when Feral will fix this?

How is this Feral/Aspyr's fault?

Yeah, I think this is an ABI problem with SSL, right?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's got potential, but it definitely needs a lot of work, especially the controls, which feel super... floaty and unresponsive.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestWhat?

It should not be up to driver developers to optimize for each game.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Not yet on negativo17's repos. (Fedora)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

To anyone still on the 375* series, On Linux Mint 18 I installed the newly released 375.66 driver using the --no-drm option (Gigabyte GTX 1060) with the mainline 4.11 kernel. Installation went successful and any game I've tried works fine so far and the system is also very stable.

View this comment - View article - View full comments