Actually it's apparently more than 23% for radeonsi. This is pretty exciting, I can't wait until it's merged into the master branch. I won't bother to test the patch just yet since they're still reviewing code + discussing some implementation details apparently.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@Beamboom
Like I've said, it's fair enough to want to wait. I often do the same for games that are clearly released in a poor state or where they announce big expansions right away. I get it. It's just annoying to see people be dismissive in general about games just because there's DLC out or planned. Whether or not something is to be recommended or fun shouldn't depend on what's on the horizon! ;)

Ultimately, I'll admit it's a pet peeve of mine. As a gamer I think we complain too much about silly things sometimes. I'd rather we focus our animosity on developers who don't deliver on ports or are terrible at communication.

All that said, in this case, in particular, I'm not sure this is stuff that should have been included in the base game. It feels like an afterthought and doesn't really mesh well with the main theme of the game. And content-wise, it's all small potatoes compared to the beefy EW expansion. But that's my opinion as someone who has been playing the game on and off since launch. Since there's no more announced content AFAIK, you should be able to get your 'complete' experience now. It's my personal hope that they'll announce a proper expansion pack at some point though. Seems like an obvious choice given the game's success.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@Swiftpaaw
You continue to miss the point entirely: there is no necessarily complete experience and that's the case with most video games these days as developers will continue to add stuff until it is no longer profitable to do so. Waiting is your prerogative but implying that something is half-baked or incomplete without actually experiencing things is disingenuous. Your so-called "complete experience" is not necessarily radically different nor does it necessarily follow a master plan by the developer in terms of vision and design.

Quoting: BeamboomI assume the features in EW was designed and implemented all along the development process of the main game, with the intention of being included in a DLC, but developed along the way and could - if they so chose - have been included on release day.

It could very well be that some or all of the ideas in EW were discussed during the original development process. Any project with a target date and limited budget will often see ideas scrapped because they can't be implemented at all or don't work well; sometimes we see hints of this in the form of unused assets and remnants in code. But your certainty that it was cut or that it was wholly conceived beforehand because of DLC purposes is a far bolder claim than mine. I can't defend Firaxis or any other developer on the basis of mere speculation of their intent but my post set out to address two things that were being complained about generally: 1) The nature of expanded content, paid or free, in modern games and 2) Whether or not XCOM 1 & 2 felt like coherent, fun experiences without any extra content.

I can definitely see where you're coming from but I hope that you can also see how and why others would disagree when you simplify a game to some arbitrary standard of completeness. It's why I asked the questions later on in my earlier post about when a game is complete. It's my belief when you're talking whether or not a game is good you should judge it by how it is at the moment, not at how it might be a year or two later and with the benefit of hindsight. By general opinion of people who have played the game, XCOM 2 is not just a working game but it's a complete game that's mighty fun to play.

It may sound academic but it's not really. Liam hated the previous DLC and didn't feel it added anything good to the game (and I felt the preceding anarchy's children was useless as well) but you can't fault the original game for that. Criticism of any product must be in its due context at its current time. Which is why game reviews are seldom updated after they're initially published.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Oh, neat. I'm a sucker for a good tactics RPG. The art looks a bit same-y but I'm willing to overlook it if the gameplay is good. I'll definitely keep my out for this when it comes out.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: BeamboomIt's a working game without, but did you play Xcom (1) before and after the Enemy Within DLC?

No, it's still a complete game. Calling it otherwise assumes that content was ripped away which has no substantiation in reality at all. This is why the portrait analogy is terrible. And saying that it was meant to be played with all the post launch content distorts the development process.

I played both XCOM 1 & 2 at launch and at no point did I think there was anything missing from the experience that made it unfulfilling. Yes EW added interesting toys to play with but both the mechanics and the story of the base game were more than sufficient to create a strong following for the game before that. I played dozen of hours enjoying the original experience without ever feeling that I *needed* what was to come later in the expansion (and obviously didn't know about). That developers improve upon their game with time and availability of additional resources should not be taken as an indication that they're selling a game piecemeal but rather that continuing success allows them to strike out in new and different directions.

Any game that has had more content added for free or via paid dlc months or years after launch falls into the same category. Terraria is a very different game today than it was at launch and a whole slew of new content exists for it that I don't think even the biggest fan would have imagined possible. Is it complete now? Was it complete a year or two earlier? If so, when did it become complete? With the PDS games of the last few years you can ask the same question: at which point does the extra development time made possible by the success of the game stop qualifying as part of the 'complete' experience and when does it start counting as extra? Surely players of CK2 at launch had no expectations that India would one day be added in an expansion or that there would be a start date with Charlemagne.

Ultimately if you feel something is not worth your money, you're always free not to buy it. It's just that the claim that something is missing or otherwise removed and creates an otherwise incomplete experience without having evidence of intent is spurious reasoning at best. Especially when the basis of those observations comes from hindsight rather than from criticisms at the moment. If you're unhappy with a game when it launches, it's fair to criticize it for not living up to your expectations. But to criticize the original product for things that were added later and no one expected really expected them to be there in the first place? That's just outright illogical and unfair. While it has a lot in common with its predecessor visually and mechanically, XCOM 2 is very different in terms of presentation, classes and with a lot of its core gameplay and so you can't assume a 1:1 translation of content.

Here's a tortured analogy of my own to cap off my point: if you go to a cafe and have a slice of delicious pie, you'll probably be all good and happy. If the next time you're around they offer you the same pie with a scoop of an equally delicious ice cream on top for extra money it doesn't make the basic pie any less tasty or not worthwhile :P

With all that said: there's plenty of room for debate as to when something is just a cashgrab or not. And plenty of developers abuse their customers and provide subpar experiences without all the extra bells and whistles. But that's a whole different can of worms to open and the assumption here is that the basic product is great by itself.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: blukpunI wrote that exactly because of what i felt reading those articles and watching shiny new video from them about DirectX 12 and Vulkan. I have this card for two years and still can't make proprietary driver work with Gnome. And it seems like it will never work. Looking at the amd drivers statistics here only proves my feelings about them. Just like 'GamingOnLinux' don't believe in crowdfunding projects (if i'm correct), i just can't believe in amd anymore.

That's unfortunate, but the proprietary catalyst drivers are pretty much abandoned. AMD is directly contributing to the kernel and Mesa with its new driver strategy. Though their main focus is AMDGPU PRO and new cards, there's a common codebase with Mesa and as a result Mesa has improved quite a lot for AMD users. If you need help figuring out how to get things working right, I suggest you pop into our IRC or post in the forums.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: blukpunThis is the best example of positive and audience friendly advertisement.

Thank you for posting about that game, it's linux release and all that during the game sale!

This post made me registered here and i'm looking forward to submit my part of the statistics.

By the way i have amd r9-280x and it's first and the last amd product i'll ever buy. Just do not believe they will ever be able to treat their linux customers correctly.

Welcome to our little community :)

I don't want to hijack the comments for this article but AMD on Linux these days isn't so bad. The old proprietary (catalyst) drivers are trash but if you have a recent Mesa version, things are overall smooth. Performance lacks in places but is getting better pretty quickly. I say that as a fellow AMD user. You may also want to see the recent articles which are pretty encouraging in terms of support from them. We're not quite there yet but I'm cautiously optimistic. Hopefully we'll have more benchmarks in the future.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: chui2chIf any one could give me some advice on how this runs on AMD FX processors. I was thinking about picking this game up, but under the requirements AMD processors are not listed. I just want to make sure I wont regret purchasing this.

Works fine on my FX-8350. I think it's more GPU dependent.

Quoting: liamdawe

Quoting: BTREPretty weak list, Liam :P

There's plenty more obviously as pointed out there's thousands, these are just the choice picks I am using for now not to tip the balance too much in my own favour. It's also aimed at creating discussion as usual :)

Excuses! :D

But yeah, I also use the days wounded one. All the mods I use are for streamlining, showing more information in places, or just cosmetic stuff - I haven't actually tried any gameplay mods yet. Maybe after I beat the game on Legend.

Edit - forgot they renamed 'Impossible' difficulty to 'Legend'

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Pretty weak list, Liam :P

Here's mine:
Lifetime stats
Lets you know how well have performed over the course of the game time.

international voices pack
More voices including Russian and Polish for that immersion.

evac all
Gets all units in the evac area out with a single click.

show me the skills
Lets you know what soldiers have which skills when deploying without having to go into the bio.

blackmarket usage
Lets you know if the items you're selling still have any other use.

new countries
Who doesn't want Czech and Peruvian recruits?

stop wasting my time
Skips over obligatory cutscenes and dialog in missions. As well as weapon pauses and speeds up movement animations.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Yep, won't be backing this unless Linux is integrated into the main campaign instead of a stretch goal. Been burned too much by devs who treat Linux users as low priority. I know it's arguable that it's justifiable given our market share but, with so many other games I could throw my money at, they've got to do better. If they want my support, they have to be more firm about supporting us.

View this comment - View article - View full comments